PIRATES v. NINJAS! Game Over!


User avatar
Guardian
Guardian
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Guardian
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4703
Joined: March 28, 2007
Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.

Post Post #400 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:47 pm

Post by Guardian »

cicero wrote:I see Ultima being OMGUS and Flameaxe being obstructionist and swooping to someone's rescue again.
I agree with this -- UA's vote of cicero seemed like OMGUS without any real justification. UA isn't making much sense; I find it hard to take him seriously. Flameaxe is definitely not being helpful -- I
still
want TSQ to explain why we should accept this, however.

However, cicero:
-In Ork mafia, mass claim day 1 won the game -- so saying it is never a good idea day 1 is a stretch. However, I doubt it is the right play day 1 here.
-Every game, UA starts out with a self-vote. So finding him suspicious for that is not justifyable.
Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
User avatar
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Posts: 1239
Joined: March 22, 2007
Location: Texas

Post Post #401 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:48 pm

Post by UltimaAvalon »

I also still don't remotely understand the objection to what I had to say about mass-claim.
Regardless of the time of day or the circumstances surrounding it, massclaims are pro-town. Period.
The central point
Is the apex
which
good question
you seem to be
town
trying to derail
You shouldn't do that
is me
cicero
noting
small word
opportunistic
big word
bandwagoning without reason
Day 1
Followed by avoidance
What do you have to hide?
of
rhymes with dove
answering questions
questions end with question marks
AlyG: If he's not a joke account then what is he? He starts bandwagons on himself and insults other people.
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #402 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:49 pm

Post by cicero »

Cool. Thanks Guardian. Appreciate the insights.

None of that changes my initial notice that UA's been jumping from wagon to wagon with no explanation and avoiding questions about it. And I add OMGUS to that as well now. Is this also his usual playstyle?
User avatar
Flameaxe
Flameaxe
Comma Police
User avatar
User avatar
Flameaxe
Comma Police
Comma Police
Posts: 6642
Joined: July 9, 2007
Location: Denver

Post Post #403 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:50 pm

Post by Flameaxe »

UltimaAvalon wrote:
I also still don't remotely understand the objection to what I had to say about mass-claim.
Regardless of the time of day or the circumstances surrounding it, massclaims are pro-town. Period.
The central point
Is the apex
which
good question
you seem to be
town
trying to derail
You shouldn't do that
is me
cicero
noting
small word
opportunistic
big word
bandwagoning without reason
Day 1
Followed by avoidance
What do you have to hide?
of
rhymes with dove
answering questions
questions end with question marks
Epic Posting.
Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #404 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:55 pm

Post by cicero »

If I call childish and hostile posting childish and hostile do I get replaced?
User avatar
Flameaxe
Flameaxe
Comma Police
User avatar
User avatar
Flameaxe
Comma Police
Comma Police
Posts: 6642
Joined: July 9, 2007
Location: Denver

Post Post #405 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:56 pm

Post by Flameaxe »

No, you get replaced for taking the game too seriously.
Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #406 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:06 pm

Post by cicero »

Flameaxe wrote:No, you get replaced for taking the game too seriously.
Flame I'm not sitting here crying but you're being a pest. The only thing youve opened your mouth to do in this game is to poke me when I try to open new avenues of discussion. It's childish and hostile and brings an unnecessary shrillness to the game, so please stop.

Ultima, ignoring the cheeky form of your answer, I have to disagree. Mass-claiming is very often not pro-town. Are you now saying that your vote for Gorrad was based on your belief that believing a mass-claim could be anti-town is a scumtell or are you sticking with your "on day one I can bandwagon with impunity" position.

See the way I see it, those early bandwagons are good exactly for looking to see who hops on for bad reasons.
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
User avatar
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Posts: 1239
Joined: March 22, 2007
Location: Texas

Post Post #407 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:15 pm

Post by UltimaAvalon »

blah blah block #2: Both

Blah Blah Block #3: Or who takes early Day 1 seriously
AlyG: If he's not a joke account then what is he? He starts bandwagons on himself and insults other people.
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #408 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:18 pm

Post by cicero »

UltimaAvalon wrote:blah blah block #2: Both
Not a problem.
Blah Blah Block #3: Or who takes early Day 1 seriously
Townies.
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
User avatar
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Posts: 1239
Joined: March 22, 2007
Location: Texas

Post Post #409 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:23 pm

Post by UltimaAvalon »

cicero wrote:
UltimaAvalon wrote:
Blah Blah Block #3: Or who takes early Day 1 seriously
Townies.
Fail. If townies took the entire game seriously, then the random stage wouldn't exist at all ever.

In fact, it could be argued that it is, in fact, scum, who try and take the entire game seriously, as they over-analyze and nit-pick over the very minor of things, in hopes to find scummy behavoir where it, in fact, doesn't exist.
AlyG: If he's not a joke account then what is he? He starts bandwagons on himself and insults other people.
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #410 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:26 pm

Post by cicero »

UltimaAvalon wrote:
cicero wrote:
UltimaAvalon wrote:
Blah Blah Block #3: Or who takes early Day 1 seriously
Townies.
Fail. If townies took the entire game seriously, then the random stage wouldn't exist at all ever.

In fact, it could be argued that it is, in fact, scum, who try and take the entire game seriously, as they over-analyze and nit-pick over the very minor of things, in hopes to find scummy behavoir where it, in fact, doesn't exist.
Not at all. I take the random stage very seriously in every game. So does everyone else. The first accusation always comes out of it. So do you. It's why you have a self-vote tradition. You have a meta excuse for your choice. It's the same as random dice rolling.

Sorry, I hate day ones enough without letting someone's first three votes have "get out of jail free" cards attached to them. That just prolongs the day and lets scum get away with anything they like.
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
User avatar
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Posts: 1239
Joined: March 22, 2007
Location: Texas

Post Post #411 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by UltimaAvalon »

cicero wrote:
UltimaAvalon wrote:
cicero wrote:
UltimaAvalon wrote:Blah Blah Block #3: Or who takes early Day 1 seriously
Townies.
Fail. If townies took the entire game seriously, then the random stage wouldn't exist at all ever.

In fact, it could be argued that it is, in fact, scum, who try and take the entire game seriously, as they over-analyze and nit-pick over the very minor of things, in hopes to find scummy behavoir where it, in fact, doesn't exist.
Not at all. I take the random stage very seriously in every game.
So does everyone else.
The first accusation always comes out of it. So do you. It's why you have a self-vote tradition. You have a meta excuse for your choice. It's the same as random dice rolling.

Sorry, I hate day ones enough without letting someone's first three votes have "get out of jail free" cards attached to them. That just prolongs the day and lets scum get away with anything they like.
No
AlyG: If he's not a joke account then what is he? He starts bandwagons on himself and insults other people.
User avatar
Flameaxe
Flameaxe
Comma Police
User avatar
User avatar
Flameaxe
Comma Police
Comma Police
Posts: 6642
Joined: July 9, 2007
Location: Denver

Post Post #412 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:37 pm

Post by Flameaxe »

Flame I'm not sitting here crying but you're being a pest. The only thing youve opened your mouth to do in this game is to poke me when I try to open new avenues of discussion. It's childish and hostile and brings an unnecessary shrillness to the game, so please stop.
I'm sorry?

Also, did you miss my discussion with Guardian a few pages back? Yeah, way to completely lie. It's cool though.
Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #413 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:41 pm

Post by cicero »

Flameaxe wrote:
Flame I'm not sitting here crying but you're being a pest. The only thing youve opened your mouth to do in this game is to poke me when I try to open new avenues of discussion. It's childish and hostile and brings an unnecessary shrillness to the game, so please stop.
I'm sorry?

Also, did you miss my discussion with Guardian a few pages back? Yeah, way to completely lie. It's cool though.
That would mean the discussion that stemmed directly from you interjecting between me and TSQ and then Guardian asking you a direct question about your whereabouts and motivations. I didn't miss it. It just doesnt change the facts.
User avatar
Flameaxe
Flameaxe
Comma Police
User avatar
User avatar
Flameaxe
Comma Police
Comma Police
Posts: 6642
Joined: July 9, 2007
Location: Denver

Post Post #414 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:43 pm

Post by Flameaxe »

Well you mentioned me, did you NOT want me to interject? I believe I had every right.
Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #415 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:49 pm

Post by cicero »

Flameaxe wrote:Well you mentioned me, did you NOT want me to interject? I believe I had every right.
You did. I just wasnt lying when I said what I said.
User avatar
Flameaxe
Flameaxe
Comma Police
User avatar
User avatar
Flameaxe
Comma Police
Comma Police
Posts: 6642
Joined: July 9, 2007
Location: Denver

Post Post #416 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:53 pm

Post by Flameaxe »

cicero wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:Well you mentioned me, did you NOT want me to interject? I believe I had every right.
You did. I just wasnt lying when I said what I said.
Except you were.
Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #417 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:02 pm

Post by Gorrad »

UltimaAvalon wrote:
I also still don't remotely understand the objection to what I had to say about mass-claim.
Regardless of the time of day or the circumstances surrounding it, massclaims are pro-town. Period.
I very much disagree with this. I enjoy when the town has powerroles.

Also, while I must say Flameaxe is, as always, being very unhelpful, his posts make me laugh.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #418 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:06 pm

Post by cicero »

Gorrad wrote:
UltimaAvalon wrote:
I also still don't remotely understand the objection to what I had to say about mass-claim.
Regardless of the time of day or the circumstances surrounding it, massclaims are pro-town. Period.
I very much disagree with this. I enjoy when the town has powerroles.

Also, while I must say Flameaxe is, as always, being very unhelpful, his posts make me laugh.
heh.

Image
User avatar
Flameaxe
Flameaxe
Comma Police
User avatar
User avatar
Flameaxe
Comma Police
Comma Police
Posts: 6642
Joined: July 9, 2007
Location: Denver

Post Post #419 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:08 pm

Post by Flameaxe »

Gorrad wrote:
UltimaAvalon wrote:
I also still don't remotely understand the objection to what I had to say about mass-claim.
Regardless of the time of day or the circumstances surrounding it, massclaims are pro-town. Period.
I very much disagree with this. I enjoy when the town has powerroles.

Also, while I must say Flameaxe is, as always, being very unhelpful, his posts make me laugh.
A) STOP BEING BITTER THAT MASSCLAIM OWNED YOU IN 68. :D :D :D

B) You're welcome. :)

Cicero: But I'm hungry... :(

Notice how you got a frownie face? That could change you know.
Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #420 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:10 pm

Post by Gorrad »

Hey, we would have won that if you weren't Olidimarra's gift to Vigs, massclaim or not.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
Thestatusquo
Thestatusquo
He/Him
Shea

User avatar
User avatar
Thestatusquo
He/Him
Shea

Shea

Posts: 14381
Joined: July 27, 2006
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: Chicago!

Post Post #421 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:35 pm

Post by Thestatusquo »

UltimaAvalon wrote:
I also still don't remotely understand the objection to what I had to say about mass-claim.
Regardless of the time of day or the circumstances surrounding it, massclaims are pro-town. Period.
The central point
Is the apex
which
good question
you seem to be
town
trying to derail
You shouldn't do that
is me
cicero
noting
small word
opportunistic
big word
bandwagoning without reason
Day 1
Followed by avoidance
What do you have to hide?
of
rhymes with dove
answering questions
questions end with question marks
Probably actually the best post ever.

Also, I would argue that the point day one, as a pro town player is to get wagons and guage reactions. The way you do this is get pressure on other players and then see how they, and others, react to that pressure. I don't see anything I've done today that cant be explained under that framework of day 1 pro town behavior.

Also, sorry for my absence this weekend. I was at a debate tournament.
tout comprendre c'est tout pardonner
User avatar
Claus
Claus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Claus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1734
Joined: June 1, 2007
Location: Tsukuba

Post Post #422 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:39 pm

Post by Claus »

Mod, votecount?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVVmAG0RXmo
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #423 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:44 pm

Post by cicero »

Thestatusquo wrote:Also, I would argue that the point day one, as a pro town player is to get wagons and guage reactions. The way you do this is get pressure on other players and then see how they, and others, react to that pressure. I don't see anything I've done today that cant be explained under that framework of day 1 pro town behavior.
Again, this misses the point. I agree with this completely but if it's to have any meaning, you are looking for disingenuous play. Just jumping on any wagon that seems to have momentum is exactly the kind of tell one
looks for in those wagons.
User avatar
Thesp
Thesp
Supersaint
User avatar
User avatar
Thesp
Supersaint
Supersaint
Posts: 5781
Joined: November 4, 2004
Location: Round Rock, TX

Post Post #424 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:03 pm

Post by Thesp »

Kison wrote:
Thesp wrote:
Kison wrote:Guardian, please explain the Thok<->Thesp link. Don't you think it's a little bit early to be drawing those kinds of conclusions?
This is wrong for several reasons.
Yeah? And I am suppose to take your word for that?
I don't care whether you do or not - in fact, you probably shouldn't. You should rethink whatever assumptions you have about this, and why at least one person thinks you're very wrong. Perhaps its a simple disagreement, but one of us is likely wrong or deceptive. (I suspect it's the former.)
Guardian wrote:
Thesp wrote:
Guardian wrote:This made like 1000 alarm bells ring in my head. My first game on this site had Thesp scum. Thesp scum refused to respond to stuff, said he'd do it later, and when he encountered something inconvenient would just be like "oh I'm not gonna explain this" -- "why is not explaining stuff bad"?
Have I ever done this as town, or is the exclusive domain of ThespScum?
Not that I've seen. Show?
Any response to anything else?
Or are the rest true?
I can dig through old games later, I don't feel like it right now. Generally, I feel at the very least that there are valid reasons for town to hide things (as I'm sure you do as well), and sometimes there are times when it's better not to explain things (or at the least that such explanations are unhelpful). If I showed you town instances of this, would you think this argument to be poor, then? Also, what do you mean by "Any response to anything else? Or are the rest true?"
Guardian wrote:
Thesp wrote: I am beginning to get the suspicion that most of the scum are likely to be the people who haven't been part of the posting diarrhea, and are lurking.
Why do you think this?
I got the sneaking suspicion that the most vocal/central players were town, and that the scum didn't feel like getting in the limelight (and didn't need to).
Skruffs wrote:Thesp:
Why is looking at the roles of dead players "scummy", but directing power roles isn't?
Because scum are more likely to pay careful attention to the roles of those who are died - they're not surprised by
who's
dead, but by what they are. Also, scum are slightly less likely to vaguely direct power roles in my experience, though I know you certainly can't take my word at that.
Skruffs wrote:Based on you fossing me, and talking about the vig that is already dead, I am guessing that you are setting yourself up to claim that you hadn't looked at the day scene, and thus didn't know any of that..
1. Poisoning the well?
2. "the vig"? Why the defiite article?
Skruffs wrote:If we want to use confirmation posts as scumtells, why hasn't anyone brought up mbf's post where he said he would enjoy playing with mbl?
I don't know what it indicates - it might indicate something, but it's beyond my grasp.
Skruffs wrote:The only person here who's hunting skills I personally respect is Thesp, and he's playing horribly.
I appreciate the compliment, though I respectfully disagree with your assessment of my play in this game. ;)
Erg0 wrote:Finally had time for that reread, but it's actually something that happened after my last post that grabbed me.

Vote: Guardian

Apparently what was actually needed to convince him was a bunch of other people agreeing with me. Very sudden turn on the Iammars issue.
I like this post.
Guardian wrote:I feel very comfortable with a Thesp wagon, but as we draw closer I wonder about the wisdom of a Thesp lynch.
Are you saying you want me pressured, but not
really
pressured? :confused:
Thok wrote:Also, does anybody actually feel TSQ's reaction to my vote on him was a protown reaction? He fairly clearly tried to frame my vote in convoluted ways in an attempt to discredit it.
I've not been comfortable with the hostility he's presented in this game, but while I think it's unhelpful, I don't think it helps indicate his alignment. :(
Mgm wrote:The fault here is that he assumed Iammars was scum when the same line of reasoning can be applied with a different starting point. Let me demonstrate:
1. I am in a game called pirates v. ninjas
2. In the game pirates oppose ninjas
3. I'm pirate town.
4. There is a scum opposing the town.
5. Ninjas must be scum.

See? The same line of reasoning applies just fine with other assumptions.
We fixed that potential argument by asking Iammars if he was a pirate. He said he was not. Try again.

I'm still contemplating whether or not it would be worthwhile to force pirates and ninjas to claim, understanding the caveats there. I am going to defer that contemplation for the moment, I suppose it's too gambity now.

I'm seriously disliking Mgm. I still seriously like Gorrad.
UltimaAvalon wrote:Blah Blah Block #3: Or who takes early Day 1 seriously
I think there's a argument to be made that Day 1 is the most important day in the game.

Vote: Gorrad.
"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." -
Reiner Knizia

Ask me about my automatic votecounter, and how you can use it in
your
game!
Check out my 15 minutes of fame on Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”