Twin Peaks Mafia (Day 9)

[jadesmar]

Ok, so what do we have for roles so far?

Jalyn - innocent - according to Cooper
jesetrnl - Rosenfield
Ptolemaic - log lady

Am I missing any innocents confirmed or not?

for now:

vote: Accountant

[Corsato]

Just posting to say I'm here, replacing zzzBeauty.

[Werebear]

Um... any clue as to how he died? Are we down to one kill finally?

[jadesmar]

We are down to these people.

ambic
jadesmar
Jalyn - innocent - by jesternl
jesetrnl - innocent - by his role claim
mith
Ptolemaic - log lady
The Accountant
Werebear
zzzbeauty (replaced by Corsato) - not possesed by Bob according to Radwulf

At least one of us is still killing people.

[Corsato]

Guess we have to wait for JesterNL's results.

[ambic]

Is it time for role claims? I very seriously doubt we have any doctors left as we just lost the cop who was unprotected. I just really want a quick debate as to the importance of it.

Jesternl please spill everything you know tonight. If I assume right about doctors you are a very likely target.

and

FOS

Werebear for asking for clues about the death. Thats a common "Tell" of Werebear when he performed a kill. It isnt proof however. So I too will wait on Jesternl.

[Ptolemaic]

I believe that ambic is guilty based on his previous actions, and the various innocent people he has voted for (who have subsequently been killed).

My vote is with him

vote: ambic

[Werebear]

FoS Ambic

- We are down to the wire - we were given no information on how our night death happened. I ask for more information, and get voted. If Jesternl doesn't have information, you just earned my vote. And this isn't a mere OMGUS, your voting record isn't favorable - and I say this knowing you're going to recap my history, I don't care, I have nothing to hide.

[ambic]

I dont care so much either. Neither of our voting histories is very good, but suddenly out of no where Ptolemaic returns to the game and says my choices warrant a vote. This makes no sense to me, care to shed some light Ptolemaic. Has there been any proof of Ptolemaics much earlier claim of Log Lady?

[Werebear]

nothing like a diversionary tactic, eh, ambic? Unfortunately, I see your point in that too. Am holding off, waiting for the flood of conversation to pour in here. They're probably all stuck in line waiting to post.

[jadesmar]

** twiddles thumbs **

[Werebear]

*twiddles claws* I was hoping more people would talk, I hate posting directly after myself. So,

Vote: ambic

and wait for day to end, OR someone to start talking. Are the mafia are the ones keeping quiet, trying to get under the radar, while the loud ones kill each other off? should I change my vote to the quietest one?

[jadesmar]

Sure.. seeing as Ambic has not been cleared by anyone.

unvote: Accountant

vote: Ambic

[Werebear]

Question for you all - what do we do with a player who has posted ONCE in all of December, January and February - and that post was "I'm so confused"? Mith's last REAL post was Nov 23rd. NOVEMBER. He hasn't been replaced, so he must be active, but he's cruised along for 3 months posting NOTHING. 94 days and counting. *shakes head*

[jadesmar]

Wait, is that person me?

[jadesmar]

Oh, mith.

[Antrax]

mith was replaced by Vegetable a little prior to moving to England, and has now retaken his role back.
Antrax

[mith]

I did? Shame no one told me.

I'll try to read through the thread tomorrow.

[jeep]

You told me you'd be willing to play again when I mistakenly sent you the "c'mon folks" message. *shrug* I thought you volunteered.

-JEEP

[Werebear]

*watches the paint dry*

[jadesmar]

Wow, 33 hours later and my thumbs are getting sore.
How's that paint drying going?

** resumes thumb twiddling **

[Werebear]

We're all alone here. I'm tired of the paint.

*watches the grass grow*

[mith]

You told me you'd be willing to play again when I mistakenly sent you the "c'mon folks" message. *shrug* I thought you volunteered.

I told you I would *if* you couldn't find a replacement, and figured you'd email me if I was still playing. Sorry for the confusion.

*~reading thread~*

[mith]

Alright, I obviously haven't read the whole thread yet, but I am going to

vote: ambic

. I voted for him on day one, and only switched because someone else (Damelon, I think) started acting a bit more suspicious. And ambic isn't on the innocent list, I see. If I were going to be online longer, I would do what I did in Brucnhma 3 (i.e. Pick someone I find suspicious, and go through every single post they've made to see if that suspicion is very solid), but it's a lot of thread to wade through in such a short time.

[Antrax]

Semi-official vote tally (I still have nothing to attach the HD to, so I have no excel file):
ambic: 3 (Ptolemaic, jadesmar, mith)
5 to lynch. ~

marker

~
Antrax