"NO!"
Well, alright then.
Yes, blatant OMGUS. That'll work.
Actually, anyone think we should do something more sophisticated than just scrambling to see who gets the item?Socrates wrote:Anyone who gets an item should immediately claim and then use it at the next available opportunity. I shall take a failure to claim as proof that scum got it. Assuming that the effect of the item is at all provable, using the item will get us a confirmed townie.
I actually know someone who's name is Joey K, but IKise wrote:Joey K?thatguy00 wrote:Does the name Joey mean anything to you?
This is the only problem:Socrates wrote:Actually, anyone think we should do something more sophisticated than just scrambling to see who gets the item?
If we all agree on one player to get the item (say, someone who is a big question mark to the town) then we get a useful tool for determining that persons alignment.
Say we give someone a gun and then tell them to shoot someone else. We can confirm a townie and get a bonus lynch from that, and if they can't, we have a likely scum on our hands. (yea yea, watch out for a role blocker, I know.)
Da Rules wrote:If you want to go for the item, typeGrab: ITEMNAME. 25% of the player-list can do this, and they will be eligible to receive the item. Those names will be randomized on random.org, and one of the people on the list will receive the item.
Da Rules wrote:25% of the player-list can do this[...]
Last to confirm.Amished wrote:Any particular reason, Dizzy?
If your plan were possible, it would make it too easy to confirm townies. Thus, either the set-up is broken (which would be an annoyance) or there will be safeguards to ensure that scum have a fighting chance, thus making your plan flawed in some way.Socrates wrote:Actually, anyone think we should do something more sophisticated than just scrambling to see who gets the item?Socrates wrote:Anyone who gets an item should immediately claim and then use it at the next available opportunity. I shall take a failure to claim as proof that scum got it. Assuming that the effect of the item is at all provable, using the item will get us a confirmed townie.
If we all agree on one player to get the item (say, someone who is a big question mark to the town) then we get a useful tool for determining that persons alignment.
Say we give someone a gun and then tell them to shoot someone else. We can confirm a townie and get a bonus lynch from that, and if they can't, we have a likely scum on our hands. (yea yea, watch out for a role blocker, I know.)
Incidentally, I expect a powerful scum team. Just putting that out there.
Not neccessarily. PRs can still go for and use items as far as I'm aware.DeathNote wrote:So people who go for items are not PRs? Is that good to know, or bad to know?
Dr.Cyanide wrote:Grab: SubMachineGun
Alright, don't anybody move! This, is a stickup!
Zombie Lords, show yer'selves.
I forgot about this for a second...DeathNote wrote:@Mod- Can you list a sample town PM?
How can you ponder this when we have seen nothing in the way of a flip? Refreshing from memory each boss has some kind of ability. Agreed it is up for debate but i'd be at loathe to say i think town is powerless considering that we would need some defence from them even minimally.Coz I get the feeling that items are there to give a powerless town some leverage.
are we certain that they ARE any town PRs in this zombie infested wasteland?
What about it?DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:I forgot about this for a second...DeathNote wrote:@Mod- Can you list a sample town PM?
unvote, vote DeathNote
Zombie Lords?Dr.Cyanide wrote:Grab: SubMachineGun
Alright, don't anybody move! This, is a stickup!
Zombie Lords, show yer'selves.
Sorry. I forgot to mention this sounded like rolefishing. Minus town points.Are we certain that they ARE any town PRs in this zombie infested wasteland?
Yeah if any of them had a halfway solid reason, I'd address it, but meh. At L-6, I'm not too concerned.Ifrinn wrote:4 Votes in what could be considered a single page? Not good. But nothing to get your knickers in a twist about AlmightyBob.
Don't scum have a sample PM anyway? Or does this mean the mod was going to post a sample PM but forgot?The AI Director wrote:5.ROLES:You are allowed to directly quote your role PM.I provided a sample role PM that the majority of the players have received, so you scum better not come crying to me about not having a safeclaim.If you wish to claim your ability, targets, or other information you may have gathered, that is allowed. If you have a question about your role, I prefer you PM me about it so I don't reveal much to influence the others' gameplay. I will allow you to ask me a question in thread, but I may feel the need to answer via PM rather than publicly. If I PM you any such information,do notdirectly quote or paraphrase my message. It was PM'd for a reason.