Mostly Mountainous (Game over)

Seraphim · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:14 am

Unvote
Vote: Llamarble

Superior wagon FTW.

Parama · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:42 am

Antihero, did you just claim scum? Cool.

chesskid3 · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:43 am

icwutudidthar

Antihero · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:50 am

Parama wrote:Antihero, did you just claim scum? Cool.

No, you did.

Can anybody guess where?

Parama · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:59 am

Well... town can't really claim scum and still be telling the truth, and I'm not a fan of lying as town, so I probably didn't claim scum anywhere...

Antihero wrote:

I was looking forward to being town with Parama, again.

Guess not.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Parama

This does look a lot like a scum claim though, considering "town WITH Parama" implies that I'm town and you're not. Am I right? Either way you're saying we're not the same alignment, and I know my alignment thank you very much.

unvote, vote: Antihero

I wish all scum could be caught this easily.

Antihero · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:05 am

Yeah, pick up the aggressive act now that I called you out.

Reminds me of someone else I knew.

Parama · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:07 am

Seraphim · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:12 am

Come on folks, the scumminess coming off Llamarble reeks. This isn't terribly difficult.

If he's so concerned about Fate getting quicklynched, why is he still voting him? It feels faked. He's looking for town points he can stock up later.

bouncy.bouncy · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:38 am

7 to lynch

Fate (5) Reckamonic Parama Llamarble chesskid3 MehPlusRawr
vezokpiraka (1) Zachrulez
MehPlusRawr (1) vezokpiraka
Reckamonic (1) Guderian
Antihero (1) evilpacman18
chesskid3 (1) SnakePlissken
Parama (1) Antihero
evilpacman18 (1) Fate
Llamarble (1) Seraphim

Not voting (0)

Reckamonic · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:48 am

Fate, we can only CAPSLOCKALLIANCE with you every couple of posts since my darling isn't quite the fan of CAPSLOCK

-Reck

Are you sure evilpacman is scum? Cause we're kinda wanting to look in the pool of Parama/Llamarble/chesskid/MPR.

Llamarble · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:09 pm

Seraphim wrote:Come on folks, the scumminess coming off Llamarble reeks. This isn't terribly difficult.

If he's so concerned about Fate getting quicklynched, why is he still voting him? It feels faked. He's looking for town points he can stock up later.

I felt mentioning the L-2 situation was sufficient to defuse the risk of a quicklynch.
I don't have a better place for my vote yet, so I haven't moved it.

Seraphim · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:18 pm

How many games have you been in that have opened with a quicklynch within the first two pages of the game? How many of those games were due to ignorance on the part of the players?

evilpacman18 · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:11 pm

And still he refuses to unvote.

unvote, vote: Llamarble

chesskid3 · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:12 pm

^ opportunistic.

Unvote

Vote: evilpacman

Antihero · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:12 pm

Parama wrote:Well... town can't really claim scum and still be telling the truth, and I'm not a fan of lying as town, so I probably didn't claim scum anywhere...
Antihero wrote:

I was looking forward to being town with Parama, again.

Guess not.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Parama
This does look a lot like a scum claim though, considering "town WITH Parama" implies that I'm town and you're not. Am I right? Either way you're saying we're not the same alignment, and I know my alignment thank you very much.
unvote, vote: Antihero

I wish all scum could be caught this easily.

This acting fails.

More parama votes, please.

Antihero · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:12 pm

Seraphim wrote:How many games have you been in that have opened with a quicklynch within the first two pages of the game? How many of those games were due to ignorance on the part of the players?

This acting fails too.

Parama · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:14 pm

Parama · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:15 pm

Antihero I'm nomming you for funniest player/post after this game okay?

Antihero · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:16 pm

I'm not going to hear the old lecture about how much your town and scum metas match up again, am I?

P. Edit: Thanks

Parama · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:20 pm

I don't even know what you're accusing me of but it's pretty damn funny regardless

Guderian · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:24 pm

^ opportunistic.
Unvote
Vote: evilpacman

This seems way more opportunistic than that previous vote.

Vote: chesskid3

antihero, would you mind elaborating on why you have a scum read on parama.

Seraphim · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:08 pm

How many chainsaws does it take to lynch a scum?

...I'm not serious by the way, I just thought it was rather funny how many people just voted other people for voting other people and calling it "opportunistic". It's not a scumtell until after the lynch. How can we tell if it's opportunistic until we see some sort of lynch?

chesskid3 · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:10 pm

K quicklynch evilpacman gogogo

Seraphim · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:28 pm

Why? Llamarble is so much better.

chesskid3 · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:31 pm

what if I offer delicious magic?