Malex McJokeus wrote:
If two votes are not all that scary to you, then
Vote: Mirth.
Although it really is just one reasoned vote and TSQ's "we know each other so it is not a random vote," random vote.
Nah, I'm betting its because before this game is out TSQ and I will end up having given each other huge headaches (if 509 is any indication). And nope, not spooked by the second vote.
I actually feel that TSQ is doing a disservice to the voting on Mirth, so I am going to take a crack at it. If I may direct your attention to a comment that I made on page two but was answered on page three. In her answer, you will see that she agrees with me that she seems shady and then goes on harassing more of the Newbies.
It does bother me, however, that you're so quick to find "shadiness" in my provocation. Think what you will, but I do ask you to think.
First of all, agreeing that I should be suspicious of you does not make me any less suspicious of you.
Who said I want to make you less suspicious of me? Maybe I want you to use your head and decide on your own if you want to be suspicious of me?
Secondly you once again stated that having two votes on someone may not make the world end and maybe it will make them talk sense. I don't think you need to talk sense as most of the things you said are logical, but I would like a few answers.
One answer I am looking for is why immediately after that post your next post was to jump all over the first thing Nahraza says and change your vote to him (or her)?
I think you're trying to find my honest opinion on game theory in what I've said so far. That should become obvious once I'm done provoking all of you.
As to why I jumped on Nahraza, I want you to think about that for a second. I mean truly think what in Nahraza's post really bothered me. (And I will give you a hint: that is an honest vote that I will stick by until Nahraza stops whatever it is that made me suspicious, or someone does something worse. I'll also give you another hint. Nahraza's subsequent posts only made it worse.) I'm not going to give you a straight answer to this yet because I want to see if anyone can figure it out on their own.
I for one can not tell you why you did that. While we can agree that Nahraza did not enter the game as gracefully as everyone else that made a random vote on page 1, does that really warrant you deciding that he should be the man to die at the end of Day 1? I would like an answer from you, as well as Battousai, as he voted for Nahraza as well.
Woah, hold on, what? Can you please show me where I decided that Nahraza has to die at the end of day 1? We're on page 3. The fact that you're suggesting this makes me think you're in a hurry. Why are you in a hurry?
Overall I find that while your tactics are getting people to speak up, it is as if you are trying to bully people into a mob mentality using your IC status as Newbie would use their's.
Am I really? And what am I trying to get them to be a mob about? I have obviously been treating all newbie players here like soulless entities sharing a hive brain and incapable of independent thought, since you can clearly see from my posts so far how I make no effort to differentiate among them and ask them questions relating to their individual posts.
Furthermore, you attack everything that is said in the hopes that it will stick.
Is this logical, I ask you? Wouldn't it be so much easier for scum-Mirth to only find one or two players to harass and do it well instead of spreading herself thin and harassing everyone? And am I actually attacking or just asking? You find hostility in my posts, is it actually there or do you assume it is and read my posts as such? And what am I trying to stick where, exactly? I'd like to know. Really.
Why are you being so aggressive? It is coming across incredibly scummy in my opinion. It is still early on, we all have our suspicions of others, but I am most suspicious of you.
You are accusing me of something that you could be accused of of doing yourself (i.e. playing aggressively) why is it an aparrant scum tell for me but not for you?
To everyone else: I'd really like to hear you talk, pretty please with sugar on top? I don't bite. Much.
. But I was saying that because I'm new _here_ and lazy that I haven't been reading much games in here so I don't know what is the way of doing things here. I have played this kind of games before but where I have played the whole system is totally different. Thinking things over and over is not the best part of me x).
. *naurs* And now you know that I'm awake.
. And now you can talk about me, yea 