Micro 1000: Names on the List v1.01 [game over!]

[Datisi]

vote count 1.02

with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-03-28 03:30:00).

execution

mozamis [3]:

bugspray, The Bulge, Mad Hatters Tea Party

Ythan [1]:

mozamis

Not_Mafia [1]:

Not_Mafia

Toby Flenderson [1]:

Michael Scott

not voting [3]:

Ythan, Dunnstral, DkKoba

game state

parity:

~ mafia members alive: three (3)
~

doom counter

: zero (0)
~ town will be endgamed once they are brought down to

three (3)

members.

previously published lists:

~ none

mod notes

~ 24 hour posting period will be resetting at 3:30am CET.
~ everyone has confirmed!
~ general reminder to be respectful

[The Bulge]

wanna talk about that tonal scumread of yours at all? @koba

[Dunnstral]

Good day to you all! I see we are off to a flying start.

The geriatric ruleset is not a ruleset I am familiar without, and one I believe I should not fall foul of regardless. I am familiar with the Not_Mafia ruleset, however, and that E-2 should be considered NM-1

While I would be more than happy to invite The White Rabbit to the party, I do believe that you are running late. VOTE: mozamis

Gut scumread on this

VOTE: Mad Hatters Tea Party

[The Bulge]

thanks for explaining, nm.

moz please answer my questions.

[bugspray]

good call! Why the "they" pronoun btw

Dkkoba, much like myself, is nonbinary.

[Not_Mafia]

Look mum, it's day 1 and I'm already using my reserves already

[Not_Mafia]

What a sight to behold, I'm the most active player

[Not_Mafia]

You love to see it lads, you love to see it

[Not_Mafia]

You all need to step up your activity and contributions

[Not_Mafia]

@mod

Are the 20 reserves posts per game day or across the whole game?

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

do you dislike the wagon or just hatter's vote?

I townread mozamis but Hatter's vote is the only one that strikes me as scummy

So you do care to elaborate, just not to myself. The Hatter will remember this.

[Michael Scott]

Bad vote

Would you care to elaborate?

do you dislike the wagon or just hatter's vote?

I townread mozamis but Hatter's vote is the only one that strikes me as scummy

So you do care to elaborate, just not to myself. The Hatter will remember this.

Interesting that you're familiar with N_M, yet two out of your three posts are simply asking him if he "cares to elaborate", do you have any other thoughts on the game so far?

-Jimothy

[Michael Scott]

Lmao so the best way to get N_M to post is by imposing a geriatric ruleset upon him

Reverse psychology ftw


-Jimothy

[The Bulge]

hey jimmo, any reads so far?

[Michael Scott]

Moz Koba Bugs Bulge town, varying degrees of confidence
N_M Tea Party scum, varying degrees of confidence

Explanations later

-James

[DkKoba]

i got busy with [redacted] and wasnt able to burn my first irl day posts.

unlucky.

[DkKoba]

dunnstral was my tonal scumread btw - VOTE: Dunnstral

[mozamis]

@ DKK - What about Dunnstral's (p.24) noting that it took half an hour for Bugspray to add to his reads? That seemed like a town "effort post" to me.
Not Mafia's flurry of posts gives me town vibes.

@Bulge - scum often post with fear/paranoia, I know I do anyway. DKK seems kinda relaxed. It's only a tentaive read mind.
By contrast, Hatter seems to me nervous and contrived.

Town now Moz, Dunn, DKK, Not Mafia.
3 scum in Ythan, Hatter, Bugspray, Michael and Bulge. And that's vaguely in order of scummiest to towniest.
I guess that means if I was calling scum team now I would go for:
Ythan, Hatter and Bugspray.

[Datisi]

@mod

Are the 20 reserves posts per game day or across the whole game?

across the whole game.

[Not_Mafia]

Fuck

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

Bad vote

Would you care to elaborate?

do you dislike the wagon or just hatter's vote?

I townread mozamis but Hatter's vote is the only one that strikes me as scummy

So you do care to elaborate, just not to myself. The Hatter will remember this.

Interesting that you're familiar with N_M, yet two out of your three posts are simply asking him if he "cares to elaborate", do you have any other thoughts on the game so far?

-Jimothy

I fear your mathematical skills are skewed. I have made 1 post asking for explanation, not two, and N_M will elaborate and enlighten on occasion if their read is significant enough to warrant it. As it stands, it was not.
My thoughts on the game so far are few, the post restriction mechanic is an interesting one that appears to have evoked several differing playstyles and I am eager to see where this will turn the game. The negative reads upon me amuse me, but do not concern me. That Mozamies considers me nervous is far from the truth, as I am nothing less than indifferent at this time. The he considers me contrived, is quite the accurate estimation given the language, structure and tone of the posts I create. Anyone who has entered into a game with myself prior to this will affirm this is NAI, and simply my standard methodology.

I do wish to challenge anyone whom believes they are capable of mimicking my verbosity and lingual tomfoolery - without sounding contrived - to certainly attempt so.

[Mad Hatters Tea Party]

Fuck

If you'll excuse the low brow humour, "nice."

[Not_Mafia]

Another day another 10 shitposts to my name

[Michael Scott]

I resent that accusation, Mr Flenderson; it is not my mathematical skills that are in question, but rather my reading comprehension skills or my ability to pay attention. However, you must have realized that the attack, at its core, remains the same: whether it was two questions asking Not_Mafia on his willingness to elaborate, or just one question and a statement that he does so seemingly dependent upon his own read significance. The problem, as it stands, is that you spent two-thirds of your then posting making commentary upon Not_Mafia, a slot that is classically known for the lack of elaborative, responsive posting. That you demonstrated knowledge of him upon entering the game implies that you must also know that attempting to engage with Not_Mafia would likely lead nowhere, and thus, two-thirds of your then ISO relating to such engagement betrayed, to me, an intention to appear as though you were producing meaningful content without actually doing so. Your perhaps overly defensive reaction to the reads of mine and Mozamis', combined with a challenge to mimick your posting style that some may find difficult to read through and parse given the general decline of attention spans on this website over the past few years, and further stubbornness to provide reads of any sort, do not inspire confidence in me about your slot. However, if you are able to maintain your gimmick of contrivance which I personally enjoy reading, I would be inclined away from placing a vote on you. Sometimes I'll start a sentence, and I don't even know where it's going. I just hope I find it along the way. Like an improv conversation. An improversation.


-Jimothy

[Not_Mafia]

tl;dr