Mystery Mafia 2- Game Over! But who won!?

MafiaSSK · Post Post #600 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:13 am

farside22 wrote:
elvis_knits wrote:
MafiaSSK wrote:
Landlord wrote:Drink up boys! It's party time!

DO NOT DRINK. If you want me to claim I will.
I'd rather you not claim unless we vote you for scumminess. I'd like to see you get more involved in the game and comment on things as a basis of judging scumminess.
I agree. Except for when Mafia started the game this has been the most chatty he has been.
Why not tell us your thoughts on who is scum or your thoughts on the case against Patrick.

My thoughts on the case agianst Patrick are that its completely and utterly right. But we can't lynch as its still Happy Hour.

The Fonz · Post Post #601 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:03 am

MafiaSSK wrote:
Landlord wrote:Hey now, no need to get excited! Relax and enjoy my wares!
But alas alcohol is poisonous to my soul and anyone who drinks it shall kill me.

BONUS.

MafiaSSK never really contributes. We basically have the opportunity to policy-lynch someone whose very existence makes the site worse, until such time as he either adopts a decent playstyle or quits. Let's do it.

Also, having re-read Patrick, his play seems to make a lot more sense than it did reading along. I no longer intend to vote him. The vengeful vig theory really has a lot of evidence behind it. Besides, think. If he's trying to argue that that kill wasn't him, even if it was, he can't do it again all game or it gives him away. I'm fine with that.

MafiaSSK · Post Post #602 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:05 am

The Fonz wrote:
MafiaSSK wrote:
Landlord wrote:Hey now, no need to get excited! Relax and enjoy my wares!
But alas alcohol is poisonous to my soul and anyone who drinks it shall kill me.
BONUS.

MafiaSSK never really contributes. We basically have the opportunity to policy-lynch someone whose very existence makes the site worse, until such time as he either adopts a decent playstyle or quits. Let's do it.

I've started to do better and I will actually contribute in this game.

The Fonz · Post Post #603 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:06 am

Promises, promises.

Buy pint of beer.

Just be glad yos2 isn't here.

elvis_knits · Post Post #604 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:33 am

The Fonz wrote:
MafiaSSK wrote:
Landlord wrote:Hey now, no need to get excited! Relax and enjoy my wares!
But alas alcohol is poisonous to my soul and anyone who drinks it shall kill me.
BONUS.

MafiaSSK never really contributes. We basically have the opportunity to policy-lynch someone whose very existence makes the site worse, until such time as he either adopts a decent playstyle or quits. Let's do it.

ROFL...

I remember when mafiassk self-hammered as town in Omod. Ah! The memories!

Also, having re-read Patrick, his play seems to make a lot more sense than it did reading along. I no longer intend to vote him. The vengeful vig theory really has a lot of evidence behind it. Besides, think. If he's trying to argue that that kill wasn't him, even if it was, he can't do it again all game or it gives him away. I'm fine with that.

I hate to say it but, I actually think Patrick may not be the way to go today. Tony Montana seems like a much better way to go for his behavior around the lord-hur lynch. Or lawrencelot. But I favor tony montana. And I wonder why he hasn't mentioned anything about my points against him.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #605 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:37 am

Also, having re-read Patrick, his play seems to make a lot more sense than it did reading along. I no longer intend to vote him. The vengeful vig theory really has a lot of evidence behind it. Besides, think. If he's trying to argue that that kill wasn't him, even if it was, he can't do it again all game or it gives him away. I'm fine with that.

Actually, this is a very salient point. I don't want Pat in lylo, for sure, or even able to cause lylo, but for now, we could definitely go for someone else. I kinda got tunneled on the current case...sorry :S.

Battle Mage · Post Post #606 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:03 pm

Bar Update

Litral - 5
MafiaSSK - 3
Patrick - 2
The Fonz - Pint of Beer
Elvis Knits - Glass of Wine
Farside22 - Shotgun
Lawrencelot - Bottle of Rum, 1
Forbiddanlight - Empty Glass, 1
TonyMontana - Pint of Beer

TonyMontana · Post Post #607 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:43 pm

Happy birthday, BM.

Also, there's enough coins left for a shotgun. I suggest we give it to Patrick.......NOT

The Fonz · Post Post #608 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:43 am

Give 'em to me.

I have a proven track record of shooting lurkers.

Lawrencelot · Post Post #609 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:09 am

Mod:

Happy Birthday!

fonzie wrote:Also, having re-read Patrick, his play seems to make a lot more sense than it did reading along. I no longer intend to vote him. The vengeful vig theory really has a lot of evidence behind it. Besides, think. If he's trying to argue that that kill wasn't him, even if it was, he can't do it again all game or it gives him away. I'm fine with that.

The question is, if he says that kill wasn't him and we don't lynch him, but it's done again, how do we know whether he was lying or not?

elvis_knits · Post Post #610 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:12 am

Patrick was hte only one alive when the first death happened... so if it happens again, it can only be him.

The rest of us are too new.

Patrick · Post Post #611 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:29 am

Well, if we're following the plan of having one of every item in the game, someone just needs to buy vodka shots. Litral seems to be in the best position. I'll just go with beer unless someone suggests any new plan. Hate the stuff though.

If we are lynching someone other than me, we have to decide by the 27th. My 3 main suspects haven't really changed.

elvis_knits wrote:He was the first (and maybe only) person not afraid of Litral or suspicious of the "quote a number for me please" thing.

If Tony is scum and knows litral is not on his buddy, he has good reason not to be afraid of litral.

I can see this, but at the same time I can see it cutting the other way too; if Tony is scum who knows Litral is not his buddy, he could very well be afraid of Litral's ability helping the town in some way, and might be hesitant to support it.

Mod

: Please prod Litral.

elvis_knits · Post Post #612 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:44 am

Patrick wrote:
elvis_knits wrote:He was the first (and maybe only) person not afraid of Litral or suspicious of the "quote a number for me please" thing.

If Tony is scum and knows litral is not on his buddy, he has good reason not to be afraid of litral.
I can see this, but at the same time I can see it cutting the other way too; if Tony is scum who knows Litral is not his buddy, he could very well be afraid of Litral's ability helping the town in some way, and might be hesitant to support it.

You're right. Still, for his position on the wagon, and his lack of a good/original reason, I think Tony was bussing lord_hur.

Landlord · Post Post #613 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:55 am

I'm insulted - everyone's so wary of my drink... it's made with love! Embrace it.

Plus, who needs mafiaSSK? He's a real buzzkill.

TonyMontana · Post Post #614 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:03 am

Pussies.
Is he still playing his game, cause if so:

Litral wrote:2

TonyMontana · Post Post #615 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:04 am

Oh, Landlord, I'll take another pint, if it's on the house -.-

Litral · Post Post #616 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:02 pm

Okay, I'm back. Will now read. Thanks Tony.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #617 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:16 pm

And I don't trust anything after the bomb. Moving along, what can I do with my empty glass besides beat people over the head with it?

Litral · Post Post #618 (ISO) » Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:31 pm

I read the case against Patrick. I don't think it's good enough for us to only consider him as a choice; then again, there isn't enough material on other people for me to vote anyone else yet. The reasons for those four voting for him do not impress me, though.

Thanks for the coins Lawrencelot. Not sure what to do with it though.... hmm...

I'll buy the vodka shots.

And thanks for the counting.

I have a thought. Who thinks there is a good reason for BM to introduce The Fonz and MafiaSSK, except "we want more people to play"?

There is the choice of letting Patrick go just because if he is scum and he kills again we will lynch him immediately, thus making him ineffective scum; this has the disadvantage of possibly being a timed bomb and the advantage of suppressing a kill if he has a partner. So I think we should only do this if there's a better candidate.

I'm going to see if there's anyone I want dead more than Patrick when I get back. I'll be voting if there's no one else. So far I think forbiddanlight is acting a bit weird.

farside22 · Post Post #619 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:29 am

Well I have something to threaten Mafia with if he doesn't start playing more.

Litral · Post Post #620 (ISO) » Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:46 pm

Killing someone because you think they won't contribute is pretty bad.

MafiaSSK · Post Post #621 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2008 1:21 am

farside22 wrote:Well I have something to threaten Mafia with if he doesn't start playing more.

What else can I say? I've said all I need to. No one's beliving me. Simple as that.

elvis_knits · Post Post #622 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2008 3:17 am

Nobody is believing you because you have made several posts now promising better, but not actually DOING better.

Provide some analysis or die.

farside22 · Post Post #623 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:49 am

Litral wrote:Killing someone because you think they won't contribute is pretty bad.

It was a joke. I personally don't like non contributers as anyone you slice it, it's anti town.

Patrick · Post Post #624 (ISO) » Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:05 am

Buy a pint of beer.

Bleagh.