Mafia 90-Lolwat? Mafia, Game Over, Mafia Win

[MafiaSSK]

why isn´t there a bandwagon on mafiassk yet

Because I'm putting in input this game.

actually all you´re doing is iioa and stifling activity

I haven't just been iioa thank you very much.

[MafiaSSK]

That's really not true; especally in a large game like this, a small early bandwagon is unlikely to go to a lynch, it gives the town something to talk about, and gets the game going. Frankly, the chances of a random early speedlynch without the guy even getting a chance to claim in a game like this are close enough to zero so as to not even be worth worrying about.

So you think Bandwagonning in a game like this is okay?

Dude. There are times when bandwagoning is perfectly acceptable. Granted, wagoning for the sake of wagoning is scummy, but if everybody went off on their own tangents and never came to a consensus, the game would make no progress.

Unvote: roflcopter
Serious vote: MafiaSSK

I thought this wagoning for the sake of wagoning...

[Yosarian2]

confirm vote:Lowell

Come on, guys, this is where the good wagon is.

...

I mean, seriously, MafiaSSK is posting at the moment. Let's go after the other habitual lurker now, wagon him until he starts posting.

[StrangerCoug]

That's really not true; especally in a large game like this, a small early bandwagon is unlikely to go to a lynch, it gives the town something to talk about, and gets the game going. Frankly, the chances of a random early speedlynch without the guy even getting a chance to claim in a game like this are close enough to zero so as to not even be worth worrying about.

So you think Bandwagonning in a game like this is okay?

Dude. There are times when bandwagoning is perfectly acceptable. Granted, wagoning for the sake of wagoning is scummy, but if everybody went off on their own tangents and never came to a consensus, the game would make no progress.

Unvote: roflcopter
Serious vote: MafiaSSK

I thought this wagoning for the sake of wagoning...

I am not wagoning for the sake of wagoning; I am attacking your views on wagoning.

[Yosarian2]

I am not wagoning for the sake of wagoning; I am attacking your views on wagoning.

I agree that his views on wagoning are wrong. Do you think it's a scummy mistake for him to make?

[alvinz95]

i <3 alvinz

You claimed lover how dare you...

Calling wagoning scummy is too basic, therefore you must be scum for it.

[Penguins of the Serengeti]

confirm vote:Lowell

Have you lost your mind?

[alvinz95]

confirm vote:Lowell

Have you lost your mind?

No'me

[StrangerCoug]

I am not wagoning for the sake of wagoning; I am attacking your views on wagoning.

I agree that his views on wagoning are wrong. Do you think it's a scummy mistake for him to make?

It's anti-discussion, so yes.

[Litral]

I think anti-discussion is only a scummy mistake if it's intentional.

[Yosarian2]

confirm vote:Lowell

Have you lost your mind?

I don't think so. Why, have you found one?

[StrangerCoug]

I think anti-discussion is only a scummy mistake if it's intentional.

Mistakes are rarely intentionally made.

[Litral]

I was focusing on the "scummy" part. Saying something that is not correct is not scummy if it's not intentionally incorrect.

[GnKoichi]

That's really not true; especally in a large game like this, a small early bandwagon is unlikely to go to a lynch, it gives the town something to talk about, and gets the game going. Frankly, the chances of a random early speedlynch without the guy even getting a chance to claim in a game like this are close enough to zero so as to not even be worth worrying about.

So you think Bandwagonning in a game like this is okay?

Dude. There are times when bandwagoning is perfectly acceptable. Granted, wagoning for the sake of wagoning is scummy, but if everybody went off on their own tangents and never came to a consensus, the game would make no progress.

Unvote: roflcopter
Serious vote: MafiaSSK

I thought this wagoning for the sake of wagoning...

I am not wagoning for the sake of wagoning; I am attacking your views on wagoning.

Vote: Strangercoug

for misunderstanding MafiaSSK's statement in a way that I don't think is even possible.

[MafiaSSK]

That's really not true; especally in a large game like this, a small early bandwagon is unlikely to go to a lynch, it gives the town something to talk about, and gets the game going. Frankly, the chances of a random early speedlynch without the guy even getting a chance to claim in a game like this are close enough to zero so as to not even be worth worrying about.

So you think Bandwagonning in a game like this is okay?

Dude. There are times when bandwagoning is perfectly acceptable. Granted, wagoning for the sake of wagoning is scummy, but if everybody went off on their own tangents and never came to a consensus, the game would make no progress.

Unvote: roflcopter
Serious vote: MafiaSSK

I thought this wagoning for the sake of wagoning...

I am not wagoning for the sake of wagoning; I am attacking your views on wagoning.

Vote: Strangercoug

for misunderstanding MafiaSSK's statement in a way that I don't think is even possible.

From my understanding of SC's meta, this isn't how he plays as scum.

[Vino]

That's really not true; especally in a large game like this, a small early bandwagon is unlikely to go to a lynch, it gives the town something to talk about, and gets the game going. Frankly, the chances of a random early speedlynch without the guy even getting a chance to claim in a game like this are close enough to zero so as to not even be worth worrying about.

So you think Bandwagonning in a game like this is okay?

Dude. There are times when bandwagoning is perfectly acceptable. Granted, wagoning for the sake of wagoning is scummy, but if everybody went off on their own tangents and never came to a consensus, the game would make no progress.

Unvote: roflcopter
Serious vote: MafiaSSK

I thought this wagoning for the sake of wagoning...

I am not wagoning for the sake of wagoning; I am attacking your views on wagoning.

Vote: Strangercoug

for misunderstanding MafiaSSK's statement in a way that I don't think is even possible.

From my understanding of SC's meta, this isn't how he plays as scum.

I don't have anything of substance to add to this discussion because I think the whole bandwagon deal was frivolous and inconclusive of scum behavior. I just wanted to make a big quote hole.

[roflcopter]

that quote wall thing. stop it.

fos: gnkoichi

[Lowell]

Back. Catching up.

[tyhess]

I think anti-discussion is only a scummy mistake if it's intentional.

I was focusing on the "scummy" part. Saying something that is not correct is not scummy if it's not intentionally incorrect.

how can you tell if it's intentional?

[GnKoichi]

Rofl, are you FoSing me for the quote wall? If so, why me and not the two people after me? If not, why FoS me without giving a reason?

[roflcopter]

Rofl, are you FoSing me for the quote wall? If so, why me and not the two people after me? If not, why FoS me without giving a reason?

not for the quote wall, that would be infantile. and i'd like to see if anyone else sees what i see before giving reasons.

[roflcopter]

crywolf, stop lurking

[Lowell]

vote rofl

. voting rofl early in games is the new black.

But really, the attacks on mafiasssk are no good. His thinking bandwagoning is bad isn't a problem for anyone but himself. rofl should know better.

[StrangerCoug]

Vote: Strangercoug

for misunderstanding MafiaSSK's statement in a way that I don't think is even possible.

Misunderstanding a statement ≠ scummy. MafiaSSK said that bandwagoning is bad in that it will run somebody up to being lynched. Well,

DUH!

Somebody, preferably scum, has to swing! If I'm unaware of just plain wagoning and bandwagoning being distinct, then by all means bring that up and straighten that out for me, but misunderstandings are not valid reasons for a vote, whether or not I'm guilty of one.

Rofl, are you FoSing me for the quote wall? If so, why me and not the two people after me? If not, why FoS me without giving a reason?

not for the quote wall, that would be infantile. and i'd like to see if anyone else sees what i see before giving reasons.

Let me guess—I just talked about it in this post?

[Empking's Alt]

Unvote

Vote: SC

The "misuderstanding" looks like it was done on purpose.