Tigris wrote:One part of the interaction I find interesting is Cad's vote with ambiguous reasons.
Would that be Cam's vote
?
There are two "leads" right now, the IS/Antrax situation and the jadesmar/mathcam situation.
I don't really see that much in the arguments that IS and/or Antrax are using. Maybe IS did try to keep Antrax alive in other games in order to point at him later on. But this combined with the current situation could mean several things:
- IS is mafia and tries to frame Antrax again by leaving him alive and commenting on it.
- Antrax is mafia and tries to defend himself/frame IS because of his comment by suggesting #1.
- IS and Antrax are both mafia and are accusing each other to confuse the town.
- IS and Antrax are both townies and are accusing each other because that's what they always do.
I'm going for #4 here, so that leaves me with the jadesmar/mathcam situation.
Mathcam seems to have some sort of information on jadesmar. He told us that his vote wasn't entirely random. That hardly seems like a claim to me, it could be based on anything. If left alone, the baddies wouldn't know enough to figure this out and/or base their kill on it. For all they know, he's just a cowardly townie. But the interesting part always comes after that. For some reason, mafia tends to fish for roles. And that's exactly what happened here too. Here are the ones that stuck out to me:
mneme wrote:Mathcam has claimed something he did last night makes it likely that Jade is scum (ie, cop, psuedocop, role blocker, etc).
mneme wrote:BTW, Mathcam: based on the events of last night, the "I think there is some chance that Jade is scum, but I can't be certain" argument does point to some obvious hypotheses on what your role could be.
Yaw wrote:From what Cam's said, my current guess is that it would be best for jadesmar to let us in on what he was doing last night first, then see if that matches with what Cam knows
jadesmar wrote:Can someone explain to me why anyone on the side of the town, would provide the mafia with clues to his role and keep the role secret from the town?
If you provide the mafia with clues, you also provide the town with clues. If you keep your role secret from the town, you also keep the role secret from the mafia ... Or maybe he has a crap role that can only do good once
.
jadesmar wrote:My first theory was that mathcam was an insane or backward investigator, who somehow investigated me as scum but why would a cop provide clues in such an obtuse manner, in such a way that a doctor may miss the claim, because the mafia probably won't.
I don't understand this. The doctor may miss the claim but the mafia won't?
Yaw wrote:This is a good chance to confirm for yourself what your role can do (I'm sensing some subtext that you're getting ambiguous results to some extent) as well as help us out in scum-catching, so we shouldn't be squandering it.
Jaguar wrote:As for the whole Mathcam thing, I'm not sure why he would hint at his role like this. If you don't know if you are insane, paranoid or normale, why wouldn't you wait a couple of nights?
An assumption that mathcam is a cop. Yet there was nothing that pointed that way.
rite wrote:Mathcam, just because I'm concerned that you may have some kind of role that depends on things being asked to you, and I believe the cat is pretty close to being out of the bag already:
Are you some kind of cop?
The most direct one so far!
Yaw wrote:Cam's hedging made me think he had a gunsmith-style role, which is why I approached the situation the way I did.
Frankly, that would have been my first choice too.
mathcam wrote:I'm trying very hard not to mislead the town, so let me come out and say that I'm neither a cop nor a gunsmith (nor, for that matter, a goober).
This is the result of asking about his role on and on.
Yaw wrote:It's nice of you to confirm that I'm right about what you aren't, but it isn't especially helpful. I'm not asking for a full claim. But is there any way you could at least throw me a bone?
I agree it's a little suspicious that mathcam "claimed" that soon, since there was no need for it at the time. But now that he did, I think we should make use of it. I don't see why following someone day one who's vote isn't "entirely random" is worse than bandwagoning a random player. Also, I think "claiming" like this on the first day when being mafia will do more harm than good. Why take the risk of getting yourself lynched after the town finds out that they lynched an innocent? Just to get this other person lynched? There's no way for the mafia to know who has which role now and sacrificing yourself for a random player makes no sense. I think that of all the games I was in, I've never seen mafia claim a role on day one when they weren't forced to. I have seen pro-town players do this. Also, I think jadesmar's non-claim is suspicious. When being bandwagoned, claiming "I'm not a cop" is something everyone else would have assumed for themselves.
jadesmar wrote:I don't understand what kind of role mathcam may have if night events lead him to believe that this is a good vote.
This quote makes me believe mathcam more. I think there was something odd going on last night, and if there was, you should at least know why there could be confusion if you're not mafia.
I'm keeping my vote on jadesmar.
Flying Dutchman wrote:CoolBot wrote:I find it hard to believe
both
of them have super secret roles that can't be mentioned.
Are you asking for claims on day 1!?
I don't get this. A lot of people seemed to be "asking" for a claim, so why is Coolbot's comment suspicious enough for FD to mention and the other, way more obvious comments (like rite's) not?
FOS: Flying Dutchman
"OH MY GOD, Cadmium! I can make rye bread! You must be innocent, I'll do whatever you tell me!" exclaims Mackay excitedly. - Jeep, Mini Game 9