This is a lie!In post 869, Nachomamma8 wrote:because he claimed one-shot
I never once claimed 1 shot!
This is a lie!In post 869, Nachomamma8 wrote:because he claimed one-shot
All my posts indicated that I was a 3 shot!In post 876, Vedith wrote:This is a lie!In post 869, Nachomamma8 wrote:because he claimed one-shot
I never once claimed 1 shot!
I assume it's only the green roles.In post 879, MURDERCAT wrote:Vedith if you are town you will go through that list of normal roles and find a situation that would explain how you got a guilty on a town player. You will do this, if you are town, because if your next group of posts doesn't contain a situation that explains that I'm voting you and we will lose.
KTS or Nacho.In post 880, MURDERCAT wrote:KTS, I'll read up but it makes sense to me that there scum would come out hard bussing today. And it explains the hiplop kill. And I think you would be the target for a mislynch from Scum's perspective. Vedith who should we lynch today?
I get either Vanilla Townie results or "Not Vanilla Townie results.In post 884, Shadow_step wrote:How did Nacho get a Not vanilla result on KTS if KTS is VT?
Anyway the voting indicates, at least one scum between nacho and vedith, or both are scum and this is their crazy gambit.
Nah, I think the goons are considered to be vanilla too and you would get a vanilla result.In post 887, Nachomamma8 wrote:I get either Vanilla Townie results or "Not Vanilla Townie results.In post 884, Shadow_step wrote:How did Nacho get a Not vanilla result on KTS if KTS is VT?
Anyway the voting indicates, at least one scum between nacho and vedith, or both are scum and this is their crazy gambit.
This means that I get a VT result on a Vanilla Townie, and a not VT result on any Town Power Roles, Goons, or Scum Power Roles. Make sense?
Both are scum because Nacho being scum here makes complete sense. It's not Nacho hard gambiting, it's just a smart play. He's hard bussing going into LyLo to make me look like scum for the win. It also explains his lurky behavior and Hiplop's NK along with the fact that Nacho didn't counterclaim yesterday and let the Bella mislynch happen. It also explains why Vedith's target was scum.In post 884, Shadow_step wrote:How did Nacho get a Not vanilla result on KTS if KTS is VT?
Anyway the voting indicates, at least one scum between nacho and vedith, or both are scum and this is their crazy gambit.
AgreedIn post 883, MURDERCAT wrote:Cops don't get fake guilties in normals. If mod wanted fake guilties you'd be a gunsmith. We are lynching vedith today.
Me figuring out the game by saying you and Nacho are scum? That's not content? I've been doing shit recently, and I'm sure as hell contributing. I don't know what you're talking about. Oh wait, I forgot you were scum talking shit about my play.In post 882, Vedith wrote:KTS or Nacho.In post 880, MURDERCAT wrote:KTS, I'll read up but it makes sense to me that there scum would come out hard bussing today. And it explains the hiplop kill. And I think you would be the target for a mislynch from Scum's perspective. Vedith who should we lynch today?
I've already said that you and Shadow cannot be scum together.
I've had you as my town read long enough, and the fact you are actually pushing for a reason why, really tells me town.
KTS could easily be doing a diversion vote where he parks his vote on Nacho until someone else votes me, he's also not had the best game apart from hammering Dragon.
Nacho - Saying that there most likely are no more town roles but yet I'm a scum cop with a JOAT. "CC" at LyLo instead. Says it was too rushed to claim any results, but he was posting enough yesterday after my claim. Comes active in LyLo.
Uh, no it's not? That far into endgame is something scum will either use their targets for or use a random person. It doesn't matter because he's simply pushing a mislynch before he dies, so the targets aren't going to get examined as much as you might think. Your logic is stupid and completely disregards any sort of sense of WIFOM which seems to have a heavy play this game.In post 885, Shadow_step wrote:Actually, Vedith claimed to have a inno on Nacho which a dangerous thing to do if they are buddies. Hmm
Vedith/KTS
So here's what we have up to here.In post 823, Nachomamma8 wrote:Vote: Vedith
I'm a Neapolitan with Not Vanilla results on Vedith and KTS (KTS two nights ago, Vedith last night). I don't think that there is town power beyond me + Bella + Rasko.
Wanting to mislynch me since Day 1, apparently.In post 563, Nachomamma8 wrote:I don't see a reason to swap from KTS to Dragon.
This is where he starts planting the very first doubt. I found his initial play regarding Hypoclaiming town because I thought he was a VT pushing for that to make a kill. The fact that he could be a PR from the hypoclaiming was too obvious, so I thought he was VT. I was extremely confused when Nacho wasn't killed. Like, he was actually legit softclaiming PR through most of D1, but he's still alive? The fuck is that shit?In post 435, Nachomamma8 wrote:I haven't gotten into my scumreads yet because I haven't had time to form any; at a glance, I dislike KTS's general interactions with me. As fucked up as it is, I very sincerely appreciate the space that he's given me wrt lurking and wrt the plan but it seems like the amount of space that he's given me is unnatural, which is an interaction I'd expect from a scum-KTS who doesn't expect me to get lynched as town. I haven't really remembered anything that he's posted so far, expected him to find something to work with by now if he was town, but am unaware if lurking is AI for him or not.
In post 382, Nachomamma8 wrote:I don't understand why Shadow is tunneling Vedith.
I think Shadow Step's tunneling on All_In and Vedith looks weird; it looks like he picked their names out of a hat and pushed them. I think that the personal level between him and Vedith makes it seem less like it's coming from scum, but am not horrendously sold on that particular nuance.
Soft defending Nacho here.In post 468, Vedith wrote: Nacho I don't see as scum, I've only played a few games with him though so meta side I can't comment but it doesn't seem off, but I don't really see why others are voting him.
Pushing me just as Nacho was. Weird, right?Out of the 3 leading wagons, KTS would be the best (Dragon lynch seems forced). KTS is more fluff in game, a bit like Jester but looks a lot more fake and trying to hide it more.VOTE: KTS
In post 592, Vedith wrote:So what was this idea Nacho had to do today?
Soft defending Nacho again.
Soft defending Nacho by soft by pulling the WIFOM right for the NK.In post 660, Vedith wrote:Do you still think that HipLop was killed to frame Nacho (or highly possible)?
More pushing me and soft defending Nacho.In post 665, Vedith wrote:This wagon?
Why did you not think it had scum on when you originally voted?
Why not Murder or KTS instead of Nacho or Shadow?
lolIn post 684, Vedith wrote:If you hammer with 12 days left and so little content KTS I'll take that as a scum claim and tunnel the fuck out of you.
So as discussed yesterday, are we doing Nachos idea?
In post 882, Vedith wrote:KTS or Nacho.In post 880, MURDERCAT wrote:KTS, I'll read up but it makes sense to me that there scum would come out hard bussing today. And it explains the hiplop kill. And I think you would be the target for a mislynch from Scum's perspective. Vedith who should we lynch today?
I've already said that you and Shadow cannot be scum together.
I've had you as my town read long enough, and the fact you are actually pushing for a reason why, really tells me town.
KTS could easily be doing a diversion vote where he parks his vote on Nacho until someone else votes me, he's also not had the best game apart from hammering Dragon.
Nacho - Saying that there most likely are no more town roles but yet I'm a scum cop with a JOAT. "CC" at LyLo instead. Says it was too rushed to claim any results, but he was posting enough yesterday after my claim. Comes active in LyLo.
LmaoIn post 895, Vedith wrote:I still don't think that Nacho is scum.
He even said that Bella wasn't confirmed when I said I have a guilty.
Well look at it this way - If it was an error, then I highly doubt the confirm on Nacho would be an error also.In post 897, MURDERCAT wrote:Lmao