SMBM 1: IoBC GAME OVER! CONGRATULATIONS: TOWN AND KAMIKAZE!

CryMeARiver · Post Post #950 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:48 am

Baby Spice wrote:
Vote chkflip

Seems scummy anyway, had a big wagon on him D1, gone absent, and will save Lord Bowser some work and anguish.

DavidParker wrote:
grovel and beg for forgiveness for having voted him: Bowser, vote: chkflip

SharkFinn wrote:
Unvote

BURN CHKFLIP

Bunnylover wrote:
Vote ChkFlip

To help out the mod, and basically we would be doing a random lynch any ways.

You can all burn. Do I have any actual reason to claim or are you all just bwing because he was lurking?

DavidParker · Post Post #951 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:55 am

how about we go after a lurker who has been posting rather than flaking? who's next baby spice

GhostWriter · Post Post #952 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:14 am

CryMeARiver wrote:You can all burn. Do I have any actual reason to claim or are you all just bwing because he was lurking?

Pretty much.

Unvote: CMAR

CryMeARiver · Post Post #953 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:17 am

GhostWriter wrote:
CryMeARiver wrote:You can all burn. Do I have any actual reason to claim or are you all just bwing because he was lurking?
Pretty much.
Unvote: CMAR

Name claim or full claim? Clearly my replacee was full of scum.

CryMeARiver · Post Post #954 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:17 am

Question: How have so many died when it's only D3...?

GhostWriter · Post Post #955 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:23 am

No, I meant we were BWing due to lurking. Sorry, I should have specified.

CryMeARiver · Post Post #956 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:26 am

GhostWriter wrote:No, I meant we were BWing due to lurking. Sorry, I should have specified.

So don't claim? Also, my other question?

Nexus · Post Post #957 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:26 am

Mod kills and a Kamikaze on Day 1.

Nexus · Post Post #958 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:27 am

...It would be helpful if the Mod updated the front page with when and how people died, actually.

Done!

GhostWriter · Post Post #959 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:28 am

No, I don't think you need to claim. I think we already have it, actually. Well, the name claim, anyway. And Nexus has just answered about the deaths.

CryMeARiver · Post Post #960 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:31 am

GhostWriter wrote:No, I don't think you need to claim. I think we already have it, actually. Well, the name claim, anyway. And Nexus has just answered about the deaths.

If that's the case, I'll confirm - Princess Toadstool (Peach if you prefer ;D)

CryMeARiver · Post Post #961 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:50 am

Nexus wrote:Mod kills and a Kamikaze on Day 1.

Also, why modkilled?

Nexus · Post Post #962 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:09 pm

Because he couldn't find replacements.

I'm surprised you replaced in.

DavidParker · Post Post #963 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:12 pm

Nexus wrote:
I'm surprised you replaced in.

DavidParker · Post Post #964 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:12 pm

Fyi, we are nowhere, and are just in the mindless bandwagon stage/post useless drivel stage of the game.

CryMeARiver · Post Post #965 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:25 pm

DavidParker wrote:Fyi, we are nowhere, and are just in the mindless bandwagon stage/post useless drivel stage of the game.

I can tell haha

Questions:
Do we know the mason buddy?
What was the kamikaze's job? (something to do with all the deaths on N1?)
Any investigations or something of the such?

DavidParker · Post Post #966 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:30 pm

My understanding was that the kamikaze was a 3rd party role who's wincon basically just involved blowing up 3 people successfully (ie none gettin protected?)

CryMeARiver · Post Post #967 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:43 pm

DavidParker wrote:My understanding was that the kamikaze was a 3rd party role who's wincon basically just involved blowing up 3 people successfully (ie none gettin protected?)

Ah, we do have a protective role or two then.
Also, do we know the chef's mason buddy or have any investigations or tracks or watches or anything helpful?

DavidParker · Post Post #968 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:47 pm

Umm, there's been nothing to indicate yet that we have protective roles apart from the no kill last night which has other possible explanations however.

CryMeARiver · Post Post #969 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:49 pm

DavidParker wrote:Umm, there's been nothing to indicate yet that we have protective roles apart from the no kill last night which has other possible explanations however.

The kamikaze autowins if there aren't, no? The way you described it it seems that way...
OTHER
QUESTIONS?

jimfinn · Post Post #970 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:54 pm

FYI, Princess Toadstool is not the same as princess peach; Princess Toadstool = TOAD. You know, the little girl with the white head and red spots on it?

CryMeARiver · Post Post #971 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:55 pm

jimfinn wrote:FYI, Princess Toadstool is not the same as princess peach; Princess Toadstool = TOAD. You know, the little girl with the white head and red spots on it?

Thought it was

Princess Toadstool = the title of her reign

Peach = her actual name? Not the same person? Either way, it says Toadstool in my role PM

jimfinn · Post Post #972 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:59 pm

Nope; Peach is the one in the pink dress.

Both exist, and Peach may be another player's role, so I wanted it to be clarified.

Images

Peach
Toad

At least, that's my understanding.

GhostWriter · Post Post #973 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 1:06 pm

Princess Toadstool IS Princess Peach. The original name for the character was Princess Toadstool. This was later changed to Peach. Two different people. Toad is a dude.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Peach#Name

GhostWriter · Post Post #974 (ISO) » Wed Jan 26, 2011 1:07 pm

I meant "The original American name for the character".