Nobody else is voting.
9 alive, eh, 5 to lynch.
You're not the only investigative role. We have Tom (Ash), whose chance of finding scum is the same as yours (Or greater, since he knows who is more likely to be killed while you have to guess who will kill). Two investigative roles in one town seems too much, so I think one of them is scum (very probable, at this point, since almost half the remaining players are scum. in onew way or another).malthusis wrote:I agree that a mis-lynch is bad for us right now, and I'm fairly certain that Tina(Y) is scum from the fact that she blocked me last night, and only scum would block the closest thing we have to a cop here.Vote Tina
The point I'm making is that Tom has to be lucky enough or have enough facts to know who the mafia is killing to find any evidence, while I practically have a guilty if someone is killing (I may have some false innocents, but when you (aka. scum) is gone, that will be a lot easier). The rest of the case of yours is utter crap logic to get the case off of you (Obviously no one could have protected the nurse because the only person who could have protected her is herself, which is illegal, ditto for the herbalist). Even if I am scum (or Tom) we would be fairly useless to the mafia (and maybe even helpful to the town, because we would still help find the SK). I'm deadly confident that you're scum, and you've done little to prove otherwise.malthusis wrote:
I agree that a mis-lynch is bad for us right now, and I'm fairly certain that Tina(Y) is scum from the fact that she blocked me last night, and only scum would block the closest thing we have to a cop here. Vote Tina
You're not the only investigative role. We have Tom (Ash), whose chance of finding scum is the same as yours (Or greater, since he knows who is more likely to be killed while you have to guess who will kill). Two investigative roles in one town seems too much, so I think one of them is scum (very probable, at this point, since almost half the remaining players are scum. in onew way or another).
I'd be very careful with the investigative roles. A known investigative role used by scum is very dangerous to the town.
Think about this one too: Why did no one protect the doc nor the herbalist?
Not true. You're right that Jennifer couldn't have protected Amy from the scum kill. But Bruce could have defended her, Mary Rose could have too (admittedly with a risk of killing her), and I could have kidnapped her. So Tina's question is not craplogic.malthusis wrote:Obviously no one could have protected the nurse because the only person who could have protected her is herself, which is illegal, ditto for the herbalist).
Very not true. The mod specifically said the SK's kill is invisible to investigative roles and that the SK has their normal night action as well as their kill. That makes Richard the Stalker and Tom the Peeper both useless for catching the SK.malthusis wrote: Even if I am scum (or Tom) we would be fairly useless to the mafia (and maybe even helpful to the town, because we would still help find the SK).
Wouldn't the alignments have been distributed randomly amongst the roles? In which case there was 4/12 * 3/11 = 12/132 = 1/11 chance of them both being scum, 8/12 * 3/11 + 4/12 * 8/11 = ~5/11 chance of one of them being scum, and 8/12 * 8/11 = ~5/11 chance of neither of them being scum.Tina wrote:Two investigative roles in one town seems too much, so I think one of them is scum (very probable, at this point, since almost half the remaining players are scum. in one way or another).
I thought that the roles were fixed and only the player distribution was random. If you're right and the abilities are not connected to the roles, my logic isn't as good (While statistically still true, even if by a slim difference).imaginality wrote:Wouldn't the alignments have been distributed randomly amongst the roles? In which case there was 4/12 * 3/11 = 12/132 = 1/11 chance of them both being scum, 8/12 * 3/11 + 4/12 * 8/11 = ~5/11 chance of one of them being scum, and 8/12 * 8/11 = ~5/11 chance of neither of them being scum.Tina wrote:Two investigative roles in one town seems too much, so I think one of them is scum (very probable, at this point, since almost half the remaining players are scum. in one way or another).
So the chance of one or both of them being scum is only slightly higher than the chance of neither being scum.
But how whould he get facts? It's not like the doc or the investigative roles have a higher chance of being targeted. Right?malthusis wrote:The point I'm making is that Tom has to be lucky enough or have enough facts to know who the mafia is killing to find any evidence, while I practically have a guilty if someone is killing
As stated by imaginality - Not true.malthusis wrote:The rest of the case of yours is utter crap logic to get the case off of you (Obviously no one could have protected the nurse because the only person who could have protected her is herself, which is illegal, ditto for the herbalist).
1. You can't find the killer, and if you could, the mafia wants him dead too, so that's a null point.malthusis wrote:Even if I am scum (or Tom) we would be fairly useless to the mafia (and maybe even helpful to the town, because we would still help find the SK).
I have no real accusations to defend from, so proving my innocense is hard. I guess you were the right choice. While you weren't the killer this time, I at least outed you.malthusis wrote:I'm deadly confident that you're scum, and you've done little to prove otherwise.
Tina I keep reading your last post to see if I've missed something. Where did you out Richard?Y wrote:I have no real accusations to defend from, so proving my innocense is hard. I guess you were the right choice. While you weren't the killer this time, I at least outed you.malthusis wrote:I'm deadly confident that you're scum, and you've done little to prove otherwise.
It seems to me that Richard is already preparing the ground for "misplays" (i.e. "I may have some false innocents") and is trying to cover the posibilities of an investigative role to help the scum. It feels to me like he's already preparing himself to the time when he'll have to face dificult questions in the future.Tina I keep reading your last post to see if I've missed something. Where did you out Richard?
Your kidnapping was wasted; Mary and Rose chose not to target anyone.imaginality wrote:I didn't kidnap Richard (like he says, his is the best investigative role we've got going for us). I kidnapped Mary Rose - because I didn't want to risk us waking up with another townie dead if she went psycho in the night. Just as well really, three dead makes it tricky enough as it is.
Worst case I move a vote from townie to townie for basically no net benefit or loss (I guess it could possibly create more noise to cut through but I figured no one would target Kevin because of his role so this wouldn't be an issue). Best case I take the vote of an anti-town player and give it to a pro-town player dramatically weakening their strength during the day phase.armlx wrote:Just wondering, why did you target anyone?Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Claim: I targeted Kevin the Home Invader since I figured the Home Invader/Hider would have one of the better chances to be alive on D1, seemingly I was wrong.
I added mine to the list.imaginality wrote:Claimed actions and results:
Misty the Librarian -chose not to target anyone
John the Advertiser -targeted Kevin the Home Invader
Mary/Rose the Split Personality -chose not to target anyone
Tina the Stripper -targeted Richard the Stalker
Bruce the Martial Artist -targeted Charles the Kidnapper
Charles the Kidnapper -targeted Mary Rose the Split Personality
Richard the Stalker -targeted Bruce the Martial Artist; no result (claims roleblocked)
Tom the Peeper -targeted Bruce the Martial Artist; saw Richard visit Bruce
Vicki the Model -