Fishythefish wrote:What does putting a vote on someone because they have several votes on them achieve?
lol
Pretty sure I've already covered this one, but once again: putting a vote on someone when they already have several votes on them pushes them toward a lynch.
Brandi wrote:Also InHim I'm not sure but what are your reasons for pursuing a bandwagon on fishyyy?
Honestly, it was because he had the largest wagon at the time. There you go, although I think I've already said that.
veerus wrote:he's deflecting without really defending his actions
Please tell me how I've deflected anything. I've not tried to hide anything that I've done. The post of mine you quoted was pretty blatant in my intent to wagon Fishy. Also, your wording just makes your case shakier. "... not really defending" - well, am I defending, or am I not? Don't throw both options out there and wait for the town to decide for you.
and tries to fuel bandwagons without any logic..
There's logic to the bandwagon, whether you see it or not.
ie. playing scummy while hiding behind the "it's too early in the game" excuse...
Once again, I've yet to excuse myself of anything, especially not using this "too early" argument. >.>
Maturin wrote:@inHim: Are you suggesting we kill off Fishy just because he has the largest bandwagon on him? I'm not sure if that's the best way to get useful information, especially considering the wagon got started in RVS.
Maybe I'm too old-fashioned, but I've never gotten this many questions from trying to wagon. It kind of perplexes me that most of you all are focusing on intent to lynch rather than using bandwagons as an instrument of the game. Does no one understand what I'm getting at with this?
Seeing as my preferred type of Day 1 is not going to happen, I'm going to have to abandon the "reckless" bandwagonry.
unvote
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Unvote
Don't like inHim counting my vote amongst the seemingly serious votes against the Fish, trying to appear to have more support than he does?
Fair enough. But why pose that as a question? I think you're asking approval of the rest of us before you lay down a vote, which happens to be scum-motivated protocol. veerus did do the same, but was not so egregious, as he is still a little more convincing of his intentions.
vote: Debonair Danny DiPietro