I feel as if you don't even want to play. Critique other people's posts. You're really coming off as annoying and that will lead to a lynch.BagSquad wrote:jesus christ you people
Would post more but I'm at camp...
If this is meant as a defense then you need to do better. If you are town, say so and stick up for yourself, don't let the mafia sit quiet as you get lynched.BagSquad wrote:jesus christ you people
I'd like to know too.startransmission wrote:If you're going to break out an OMGUS at least write something.BagSquad wrote:>:(iamausername wrote:Unvote, Vote: BagSquad. Based on what everyone has posted so far, he seems most likely to be scum.
Vote:iamausername
I do want to know what iamusername found especially scummy about your earlier posts though.
I think it's more like people were waiting to see what BagSquad had to say for himself. Also one person is being replaced, so we probably can't expect to hear much from him. And the weekends are usually pretty quiet.startransmission wrote: I say this because as soon as momentum went against Bagsquad, this game got very very quiet. It wreaks of scum sitting on thier hands and waiting for day two.
Do I really need to spell it out? There weren't any earlier posts from BagSquad. I said that, based on the posts made at the time, BagSquad was the most suspicious, because he hadn't posted yet. None of the people who had posted had done anything suspicious enough to make them scummier than the guy who was not posting. That's all.bouchedufou wrote:I'd like to know too.startransmission wrote:I do want to know what iamusername found especially scummy about your earlier posts though.
It also seems that crazypianist didn't see this either. It has nothing to do with his being an SE, he was asking the question of bouchedufou, who believes that a random vote should lead to a claim for some reason.Halidon wrote:How so indeed? And what is the purpose of you claiming so early in the game when no one is in danger of being lynched yet? Do you care to explain?iamausername wrote:Do you think it would be helpful for me to claim now?
Vote: Halidon
This vote is not random.
You said, in more or less words, that you want this person to claim, therefore making your random vote, a non-random vote. Your statement can be taken as you are scum and want to know what username's role is so you know whether or not he's worth it to vote for or NK.bouchedufou wrote:Yippee! Started!
So this is a random vote to get the guy to claim?
vote- iamausernam
Now what happens?
The above was asked of you, which is answered with this?startransmission wrote:If you're going to break out an OMGUS at least write something.BagSquad wrote:>:(iamausername wrote:Unvote, Vote: BagSquad. Based on what everyone has posted so far, he seems most likely to be scum.
Vote:iamausername
I do want to know what iamusername found especially scummy about your earlier posts though.
On top of it all, to find out that you "don't even lurk" because you never actually played/completed a game here bothers me.BagSquad wrote:I completely forgot this website existed, to be honest. I don't even lurk (and yes I am dangerous don't fuck with me bro).
Also, I'm still keeping my vote for iamausername, because he is mean, and talks a lot. Sounds like scum to me.
I'm thinking that Bag is probably town. Just like Vel brought up earlier about the game he signed up for in December, he doesn't seem to care. I really dislike lurkers and those who post zero content.BagSquad wrote:jesus christ you people
Sorry, like I explained before, I got confused because the game I watched was on a different site and themed (vampires or something), and for some reason I thought you were supposed to claim. I have read the main guide now though, and some other stuff.Why would you think a random vote would lead to a claim? It would be random, if you just chose someone. You didn't.
You said this:
bouchedufou wrote:
Yippee! Started!
So this is a random vote to get the guy to claim?
vote- iamausernam
Now what happens?
You said, in more or less words, that you want this person to claim, therefore making your random vote, a non-random vote. Your statement can be taken as you are scum and want to know what username's role is so you know whether or not he's worth it to vote for or NK.
I'm not bouncing my votes around- the first one I didn't really know what I was supposed to do, the second one I was trying to get Jeromus to respond. And once he did and explained himself, I unvoted him. No other votes. After that, I was careful not to vote too often, despite my suspicions of Baggy.You are also bouncing around your votes quite a bit. You need to be careful of that, it's normally typical of scum to bounce around on different wagons.
bouchedufou wrote:The problem as I see it is, now we're pretty much back to the random stage. Very few solid leads apart from baggy, and he's not doing anything to defend himself. Therefore, I think we should ignore baggy unless he speaks up as we've still got 3 weeks to go over.
Let me emphasize that sentence again.iamausername wrote:This seems like an odd conclusion to draw. I can see the possibility that he'd be acting as he has regardless of alignment, but I certainly don't see how his behaviour could be aStarbuck wrote:I'm thinking that Bag is probably town.towntell.
jeromus! What do you think of VRK?
Maybe ignore is the wrong word, but read one of my earlier posts. I'm basically saying that until he reacts, it's pointless for us to focus on baggy. We'll be bogged down on somebody who we'll probably lynch anyway, when instead we could be examining someone else. If he replies, we should definitely pay attention, but right now? Our time would be better spent turning up the heat rather than sitting around congratulating ourselves.Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:bouchedufou wrote:The problem as I see it is, now we're pretty much back to the random stage. Very few solid leads apart from baggy, and he's not doing anything to defend himself. Therefore, I think we should ignore baggy unless he speaks up as we've still got 3 weeks to go over.
How is ignoring him going to help? If he's town, he's not helping us win the game and he's not living up to his win condition. If he's scum, you're giving him a free pass. Ignoring him is the worst thing we can do. Bag either needs to answer the questions asked of him, or get replaced so we can have someone in there who is willing to, you know,play the game.
bouchedufou wrote:Maybe ignore is the wrong word, but read one of my earlier posts. I'm basically saying that until he reacts, it's pointless for us to focus on baggy. We'll be bogged down on somebody who we'll probably lynch anyway, when instead we could be examining someone else. If he replies, we should definitely pay attention, but right now? Our time would be better spent turning up the heat rather than sitting around congratulating ourselves.Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:bouchedufou wrote:The problem as I see it is, now we're pretty much back to the random stage. Very few solid leads apart from baggy, and he's not doing anything to defend himself. Therefore, I think we should ignore baggy unless he speaks up as we've still got 3 weeks to go over.
How is ignoring him going to help? If he's town, he's not helping us win the game and he's not living up to his win condition. If he's scum, you're giving him a free pass. Ignoring him is the worst thing we can do. Bag either needs to answer the questions asked of him, or get replaced so we can have someone in there who is willing to, you know,play the game.