hiphop wrote:Do you honestly believe that the person that replaced BagSquad, a completely different person, would act the same as him. Don't try to connect us. Connect me for me and not to him. One thing I can say is I am not unresponsive, since I answered your post.
Hey hiphop, welcome to the game. As a fun gesture I will
Unvote
Now, regarding what you have said above- you are in a way the same person as BagSquad. Or rather, you have the same
role
. So while I don't think that anyone expects (or certainly would want) you to behave like BagSquad, the fact is that you have taken over the role- not the identity- of the overall top scummy player. So you're connected, like it or not. You will be pushed, consider it a challenge.
With that said, having read back what is your analysis of the game, and specifically your predecessor?
Starbuck wrote:@Bouchedufou - You know why we wanted Bag replaced. You listed it. Every person with a vote on him was because he was lurking, not because (most) knew him to be scum. You need to give hiphop a chance before you jump all over him.
Just to clarify I voted for BagSquad because I felt he made a very dishonest post early on. It was a matter of me not trusting him. His lurking came after. I know it's a dumb distinction, but I felt it should be made.
Maemuki wrote:It's just that...There's nothing else going on. If there's something going on, please warn me, because I completely missed it. I don't want to get prodded, so I just post stuff about Baggy, because, that's all the clues we have right now. Besides, his play-style just downright annoys me.
Yeah, I dig. Like I said, I don't find you too scummy. It just bothered me that your posts were... safe. Echoing the sentiments of the town in brief posts is a nice way for scum to blend in. You raise my eyebrow, that's all.