Ibrahimagic 1 Diakron
skitzo
Tehstefan
Bub Bidderskins 1 Raskol
Del
Raskol
Maemuki
Debonair Danny DiPietro 1 Maemuki,
Not Voting
Debonair Danny DiPietro
Del
Have you ever played mafia before?Bub Bidderskins wrote:Why? Honestly,Raskol wrote:unvote
vote: Bub BidderskinsI was tyring to pressure him into roleclaimingand was waiting for a response. Instead, now we're back at L-2 because of your antics. Fine, if you want to hammer him, go ahead.
vote: diakron
As a matter of fact, no. In anyway, I thought it would be fun to see if he was lying or not. :shrugs:Raskol wrote:Have you ever played mafia before?Bub Bidderskins wrote:Why? Honestly,Raskol wrote:unvote
vote: Bub BidderskinsI was tyring to pressure him into roleclaimingand was waiting for a response. Instead, now we're back at L-2 because of your antics. Fine, if you want to hammer him, go ahead.
vote: diakron
You do realize you're not dead yet, yes?Diakron wrote:im sorry but the way you play baffles me and i cant play like i want to and nor can i hide the fact that i have very poor playing skills i dont know most "official" terms to mafia and RVS baffled me. random voting is a strategy to me not an official stage of the game.
I have nothing else to say as this game is so slow that i have gotten bored with it. i will try playing one more time on this forum and if its the same i will find another place to play.
I hate to play any two games the same way so even if it's something small like not voting in the RVS I always try to do something different.Raskol wrote:---Why did you random vote last game but not this one?
I think we have ten days (at least?) till deadline and that there's no reason to panic and do anything rash just yet. In fact there appears to finally be good information from at least some players to evaluate so no need to do something nonsensical like vote randomly.---What would you think of lynching today based on a random roll among the 4 players who have the lowest in-thread postcount two days before deadline?
Well I'd like Diakron to say something again after his rather defeatist seeming post, but before that I didn't much care for what I was seeing. My top suspect is probably one of the undercontributers, but I haven't yet really gone and parsed them apart yet.---Who are your top targets for scum at this point, and why? (I realize there's not much info yet).
With someone at L-1, I assumed the RVS was over, hence my FoS. If I felt that we were still in RVS, then my reasoning wouldn't make much sense since he would still have time to throw out an accusation/vote or two.Maemuki wrote:Are you trying to extend the RVS? And did you notice that we have, well, a person at L-1?Del wrote:Fos: DDD
For somehow not throwing out random accusations and votes during RVS.
unvote
Because Raskol's posts made me laugh
Bub Bidderskins wrote:My opinion on Diakron huh? Well, I don't know any more. He says he's played Mafia on another site and doesn't know what an RVS is, as well as taking the RVS way too seriously.
Well, Diakron also took the RVS too seriously and yet he still claimed to have played the same game on a different site. Still, I admit that on different sites they might have different customs and abbreviations. Even though I voted for him, everybody should still think hard before hammering him. We still have quite a bit of time left, and there's no need to rush a lynch.Del wrote:EBWOP
Bub Bidderskins wrote:My opinion on Diakron huh? Well, I don't know any more. He says he's played Mafia on another site and doesn't know what an RVS is, as well as taking the RVS way too seriously.
Having played Mafia on another site, I have never heard of RVS until stumbling upon Mafiascum. I guess browsing pages such as this:
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php ... reviations
And browsing some threads/guides.
Back on topic and in answer to Raskol's question about top two suspects, I cannot yet answer without saying none. I considered Diakron and Bub, but I somewhat dislike translating apparent newbieness and ignorance to scuminess. Of course, if it turns out they were feigning being newbs/ignorance, then I'm sure for my next game I'll have turned as cynical as any.
I was thinking of it more as an incentive to activity, actually.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:I think we have ten days (at least?) till deadline and that there's no reason to panic and do anything rash just yet. In fact there appears to finally be good information from at least some players to evaluate so no need to do something nonsensical like vote randomly.---What would you think of lynching today based on a random roll among the 4 players who have the lowest in-thread postcount two days before deadline?
We could just shamelessly bandwagon them until they say something instead, how does that sound?Raskol wrote:I was thinking of it more as an incentive to activity, actually.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:I think we have ten days (at least?) till deadline and that there's no reason to panic and do anything rash just yet. In fact there appears to finally be good information from at least some players to evaluate so no need to do something nonsensical like vote randomly.---What would you think of lynching today based on a random roll among the 4 players who have the lowest in-thread postcount two days before deadline?
And post the vote count.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Mod:(If you're there. It's me, Margaret) Please prod Iba---magic and anyone else who needs prodding.
Maemuki wrote:You did not understand my question. Did you? I asked if you were trying to extend the RVS, by [on my view] randomly voting Raskol. Did you have a serious reason?