My apologies for not getting a vote count done sooner. I was out of town Friday house-hunting and haven't had a chance to get on the interwebz until now.
I also noticed that a ton of the random votes have been removed. I plan to keep mine for the time being. Them all coming off so quick gives me pause actually.
The IC here's job is to help you learn the game not lead you through it. Each IC has a different way to IC their games. Some will lead the newbies around by the hand and some will let you play and answer questions as they arise. I have played with Pablo recently and he is not doing too much differently than I've seen him. Basically he has not done anything to raise my flags yet. I'm also a qualified IC and will help out where I can if it's ok with Pablo.
The more I see, the less I know
The more I'd like to let it go.
OMGLyncher, if you're town, hiding in the shadows will not help at all. I've seen people lynched for lack of activity. Town needs opinions of other town, even complete noobie opinions are helpful. I'm not saying go crazy and never stop posting, just post enough that we can get a read on you and hopefully know how you feel about things.
I'm feeling a little bit nervous about Pablo right now.
"Otherwise, I'm just here to win the game for the town like (most of) the rest of you."
If that's not WIFOM I don't know what is. I don't find starting an OMGUS vote with OMGUSvote: that suspicous. He's a noobie. That could be tooken two ways, either a pro-town player making sure he isn't accidentally lynched during RVS or mafia being overly careful. Looking at the second part, he didn't rise up for what, three days? I know having to wait for posts is annoying, but RL is still there. I'm not defending OMGl, and at this time I do not believe he is town (or scum for that matter), I simply don't think the case is strong enough to vote on. It's early in day one, I'd like to progress alittle bit more and here more people's opinions. I honestly think a longer day one is better, more analysing gives town a better chance of lynching scum.
Currently watching:
T-Chan: Could be a powerful player, reasons stated in another post.
Pablo: The WIFOM scares me a little bit, especially considering you're an IC. I feel like you're trying to win town over with your posting style.
There is not a lot of talk, and the little there is re-iterates that we have even less to go on. So I'll ask a couple questions to all:
What behaviour do you consider to be scummy?
Who do you believe is trying to stay out of the limelight, and who do you believe is just quiet?
Yay~!! I'm so happy that activity seems to have picked up~!
@OMGLyncher:
OMGLyncher wrote: I didn't want to vote because It looked like you and deathnote were both on L-2 at some point and if I'd voted...
But that is wrong... we were both at L-3 at the time you FoS'ed us. >_<;
OMGLyncher wrote:Why did I stay in the background after that?
Oh?? I thought you were only being inactive... so you were lurking....??? @_@; That's not a good sign!!
And no, it is not a good idea for you to be inactive. We don't mind being confused, but we'd hate it if you just stayed in the background and did nothing~~~ now that would confuse us a lot if you were town because it's scum that like to lurk~~ >_<;;
Go ahead and flame, just steer clear from ad hominem arguments~~
OMGLyncher wrote:
Keep the noose around my neck for now: I need to earn my way out of this suspicion.
T-Chan: At this time, by powerful, I mean posts and can get opinions across in a way that they sound somewhat appealing.
Mitey: I was wondering if there was something else that made you suspcious. If it's based on banter at the beginning of the game, that's fine right now lol.
OMGLyncher wrote:Why did I stay in the background after that?
Oh?? I thought you were only being inactive... so you were lurking....??? @_@; That's not a good sign!!
That is straw-manning my position somewhat. Both life and caution contributed to the time between posts. You cannot accuse someone of Lurking if they contribute with If I had posted with what I first thought, thereby passing your criteria for activity, I would have posted stupidly and replaced your baseless accusations with legitimate concern.
That's not my point~
I understand that people have things to do other than play this game~~ so initially, I didn't consider your lack of activity suspicious~~ ^_^;;
But when questioned by Pablo, you admitted to "staying in the background." And "staying in the background", those words, have the same meaning as "lurking".... >_<;;
It's not me who said that you lurked. It was you~ o_o;
Another thing I noticed....
OMGLyncher wrote:Woah that is a scary number of questions (I guess I deserve them).
...
Keep the noose around my neck for now: I need to earn my way out of this suspicion.
In other words~~ my concerns are legitimate, and you seem to realise this! ^_^
OMGLyncher wrote:If I had posted with what I first thought, thereby passing your criteria for activity, I would have posted stupidly and replaced your baseless accusations with legitimate concern.
But one post later, my accusations are baseless. Which is it??? @_@;;
@Mitey- Please unvote because you have no bases other then a RV. At this point, we need every Vote to be taken seriously.
@Pablo- watching....
@Paltry- Really? I realize that the game has just started and we don't have much to go on but don't vote simply to get out there. Fitz could very well be having issues getting online and although I dislike that he has stated to not be V/la now and not post anything to contribute, it is not enough to vote considering the other options.
@OMGLyncher- Lets see...
Contradiction of posts- check
Active Lurking- check
Admitted to being a good choice for lynch atm- check
They building up on you Lyncher. How many votes are on him? 2 or 3? I think it is only 2 (3 with me) but everyone keep in mind that 5th vote is hammer so lets be careful not to end the day prematurely.
I think at this point a little pressure can be put on fitz. If he is having trouble getting online, he has ample opportunity to respond (and I'll take back my vote if that's the case). I see the case building against Lyncher and think fitz probably has an opinion on the developments at this point. Where is the problem in provoking a response on someone who I have little information on? It doesn't seem like the group as a whole is ready to lynch Lyncher, so I'm trying to get input from another source. In any case, I'll
unvote
, as it has become apparent that disclosing all this information might defeat the purpose.
Lets get some activity in here guys. I know your there Mouse as I just saw you post in another game. I'm calling you out to post something. However, this goes for everyone else too! The game can't really start until we get some movement.
