Mini 852- Crayola Catastrophe Game Over (Post 1158)

[semioldguy]

Vote: Chamber

Trying to appear townie by being concerned over a quick bandwagoning. I see no real reason to think of that as a threat at the point of his unvote. It looks to me like he is trying to gain townie points. Town shouldn't have to try to do that, it should come natually and his comment did not feel natural.

FoS: ChiboSempai

For seeming too willing to please or go along with others (both with his vote and his unvote).

[semioldguy]

Actually...

Unvote; Vote: ChiboSempai

I think he is a little more likely to be scum. Though I wouldn't mind either of those two being run up with a few more votes. Chamber, you aren't off the hook yet; I've got my eye on you.

[semioldguy]

Anyone who tries to vote for someone because they have an unreadable color will earn my vote from this point forward. There are much easier ways to deal with being able to read them (such as highlighting all their text with your mouse).

[Manzcar]

Random

Vote: Budja

. I've never played with him before.

in re-reading the thread I found this very interesting.

Why did you make it a point to say you haven't played with Budja before? I haven't played with you either and you didn't even FoS me.

[Pomegranate]

Random

Vote: Budja

. I've never played with him before.

in re-reading the thread I found this very interesting.

Why did you make it a point to say you haven't played with Budja before? I haven't played with you either and you didn't even FoS me.

I voted randomly. Generally during RVS I vote for someone with whom I've never before, and either say that I've never played with him/her before or make up a stupid reason (like having a weird avatar, etc.).

[Battousai]

Vote Count:

GreenDude (2) – Snow_Bunny, Budja
ChiboSempai (2) – GreenDude, semioldguy
Snow_Bunny (1) – Nachomamma8
Budja (1) – Pomegranate
Chamber (1) – Manzcar
Manzcar (1) – SocioPath

Not voting (4): Kirbyoshi, chamber ChiboSempai, Josh Lyman

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch!

[Josh Lyman]

I'm just trying to avoid heat. You know, because I would MELT. Melting is bad.

Semi-random

vote: Kirbyoshi

for not voting. And not posting.

I can't stand lurkers.

[semioldguy]

I'm just trying to avoid heat. You know, because I would MELT. Melting is bad.

I dislike it when people look like they are attempting to breadcrumb in an obvious way. It looks as if that's what you are doing, blatantly breadcrumbing something. Players shouldn't need to breadcrumb, if they ever should claim, then they way they play their role should dictate whether the claim is believable, not some looney post at the beginning of the game.

[SocioPath]

Anyone who tries to vote for someone because they have an unreadable color will earn my vote from this point forward. There are much easier ways to deal with being able to read them (such as highlighting all their text with your mouse).

Unvote
Vote: semioldguy

Readable color, but it clashes with the background. Blue on blue? Looks very tacky and unprofessional.

[chamber]

Vote semioldguy

High horses are high.

[semioldguy]

Vote semioldguy

High horses are high.

Your OMGUS and hypocrisy are noted. You seem strongly concerned with a wagon that builds quickly, yet now you seem to seek out to do the exact thing you ctiticize, build a wagon quickly with no case to support.

If chamber flips scum, GreenDude could be a likely buddy due to the different wagon reactions.

[GreenDude]

unvote, vote: Budja

Lynch all racists!

[GreenDude]

Hey my color is readable on blue. I'll have to do a bump every now and then to be readable.

[GreenDude]

Dang, I forgot it doesn't do yellow in quick post

[Josh Lyman]

I'm just trying to avoid heat. You know, because I would MELT. Melting is bad.

I dislike it when people look like they are attempting to breadcrumb in an obvious way. It looks as if that's what you are doing, blatantly breadcrumbing something. Players shouldn't need to breadcrumb, if they ever should claim, then they way they play their role should dictate whether the claim is believable, not some looney post at the beginning of the game.

I.... wow.

Somebody's grumpy!

[chamber]

Vote semioldguy

High horses are high.

Your OMGUS and hypocrisy are noted. You seem strongly concerned with a wagon that builds quickly, yet now you seem to seek out to do the exact thing you ctiticize, build a wagon quickly with no case to support.

If chamber flips scum, GreenDude could be a likely buddy due to the different wagon reactions.

First, that was the second vote not the forth. Second that was for an arbitrary reason, my vote for you was note.

[Kirbyoshi]

Wow, it's seriously going to be hard playing with Socio, since I'm using the tiger skin =/

Vote: Pomegranate

because she says her first vote is always on someone with whom she's played before, yet she's the only one here I

have

played with before. Obvscum.

[Pomegranate]

Vote: Pomegranate

because she says her first vote is always on someone with whom she's played before, yet she's the only one here I

have

played with before. Obvscum.

I said have (played with before)? I meant haven't.

Also, right now I'm in Mini 851 with Chibo.

[Manzcar]

You did Pom say never.

Kirbyoshi, why are you misrep'n? Pomegranate said she votes for someone she hasn't played with before.

[SocioPath]

Vote: Pomegranate

because she says her first vote is always on someone with whom she's played before, yet she's the only one here I

have

played with before. Obvscum.

I said have (played with before)? I meant haven't.

Also, right now I'm in Mini 851 with Chibo.

You were correct in both mentions of it. You haven't said otherwise yet. No typos so far as far as THAT goes.

[Pomegranate]

Kirb, why'd you twist my words?

Thanks Manzcar and SocioPath for telling me I was right .

[Kirbyoshi]

Oops, I was guilty of the typo in this instance, I meant "someone she

hasn't

played with before."

[Pomegranate]

Blah. All (or at least most) is forgiven.

[SocioPath]

Thanks Manzcar and SocioPath for telling me I was right .

Obvbuddying

[semioldguy]

First, that was the second vote not the forth. Second that was for an arbitrary reason, my vote for you was note.

First, arguing which number it was doesn't address what the vote does or appears to be doing. Second, if you don't share your reason, then I have no reason to believe your vote on me wasn't arbitrary. And it's still OMGUS.