Mafia 105 - Caught in the Crossfire (Game Over)

[charter]

Vote Count, Day 1

Not Voting (25) All

With 25 alive, 13 needed to reach a majority.
Deadline is at December 1st, 11am EST

Guys, if this game could be as awesome as TDC's large normal, that would be awesome. Rofl, you know what I'm talking about.

[charter]

Slash, hey everyone! I <3 in this game.

[charter]

Also, sorry guys, I am drunk, but seriously, <3 elvis and rofl. And hoopla.

[Sotty7]

Drunk love!

... I gets none

[popsofctown]

I wuv you Sotty!!


... ok I'm actually sober. I'm not drinking age yet.

[zoraster]

We only have one left to confirm, Idiotking. With 24/25 confirmed, I see little reason to hold off on starting the game now. I'll give Idiotking until Sunday morning to confirm and then I'll replace. Anyway:

DAY 1 Begins NOW!

Deadline at December 1st, 11:00am EST

A few points for consideration:
1. Anyone fake claiming or evaluating a claim should look at the "roles available" section.
2. I clarified a rule for lynching at II(3a).
3. Unless I'm unavailable to do so, post counts will be added to the first post on each page. Vote counts are always only good up to that post.
4. Lynch some scum, town!
5. In response to RC: I considered the hypocrisy of my rules. Then decided I didn't care

[Hoopla]

Vote: VI

, I guess.

[sigma]

Vote: hiphop

This vote is not entirely random -- I specifically decided to vote someone who I haven't played with before.

[crypto]

Vote: ConfidAnon.

Bastard guised me.

[Sotty7]

Vote: Sigma

Also not entirely random. I decided to vote for someone who has beaten me before

[popsofctown]

Vote: hoopla

[hitogoroshi]

I personally want to discover whether or not it is possible to lynch something that can fly.

vote:roflcoptor

[Pads]

vote: SpyreX

for enslaving the Spathi.

[roflcopter]

amazingly there is no one in this 25 person game that i want to policy lynch. that might be a first.

i do <3 elvis and charter, but i'm gonna go with a spread love vote

vote: sotty

[Maemuki]

Vote: Roflcopter

Why can you have a roflcopter and I can't? That's just unfair!

[crypto]

Will probably be on V/LA this weekend.

[RedCoyote]

Will probably be on vote: crypto this weekend.

[Infinis]

Vote:sigma

When clearly his avatar is for Sigmas

[CSL]

Vote: Maemuki

because she's not talking to me much anymore!

[Vi]

vote: SpyreX

for enslaving the Spathi.

Except they wanted to be enslaved so yeah.

Vote: sigma

(L-10)
Bandwagoning someone who, if scum, could be a significant threat.

[sigma]

Also not entirely random. I decided to vote for someone who has beaten me before

Bandwagoning someone who, if scum, could be a significant threat.

Thanks for the compliments. (I think.)

---

I'm a little disappointed that my non-random vote hasn't gotten any feedback yet. I'll go into the reasoning a little more: I have some decent meta on those who I've played with before (anyone in Mini 839 + CSL). Furthermore, the person who I vote for is more likely to be wagoned than any of the people I don't for. Furthermore, if someone gets wagoned in the early game, it will give me something to go on for a person that I don't have any meta experience for. So, I voted for someone I hadn't played with before.

@anyone who will answer: Do you agree with my reasoning?

Fixed tags

[Vi]

I'm a little disappointed that my non-random vote hasn't gotten any feedback yet. I'll go into the reasoning a little more: I have some decent meta on those who I've played with before (anyone in Mini 839 + CSL). Furthermore, the person who I vote for is more likely to be wagoned than any of the people I don't for. Furthermore, if someone gets wagoned in the early game, it will give me something to go on for a person that I don't have any meta experience for. So, I voted for someone I hadn't played with before.

@anyone who will answer: Do you agree with my reasoning?

It's okay; people are having fun stalling the beginning of the game for no evident reason~

I understand and agree with your reasoning.
Do you think this ruse will succeed now that you've explained it?
What were you

hoping

would happen?

[sigma]

Don't really see it as a ruse. A scum-tell is something you shouldn't reveal, certainly, but me explaining my voting strategy shouldn't appreciably change the likelihood of an early bandwagon at this point.

I was hoping that someone would take offense at my stated reason and non-random vote me. I don't think that's likely to happen now -- probably should have waited a little longer for that to happen, but I'm feeling impatient.

people are having fun stalling the beginning of the game for no evident reason

Are you accusing someone of stalling? I think you should name names.

[Vi]

people are having fun stalling the beginning of the game for no evident reason

Are you accusing someone of stalling? I think you should name names.

I would be accusing everyone who isn't trying to generate discussion with their random votes of stalling.
Unfortunately I only have one vote, and I currently prefer my current approach for finding scum over the trouble of seeing who is most egregiously faking their random vote.

I was hoping that someone would take offense at my stated reason and non-random vote me. I don't think that's likely to happen now -- probably should have waited a little longer for that to happen, but I'm feeling impatient.

People

are

nonrandomly voting for you...
Were you expecting anything at all from hiphop, then, or were you trying to incite general controversy?

Don't really see it as a ruse. A scum-tell is something you shouldn't reveal, certainly, but me explaining my voting strategy shouldn't appreciably change the likelihood of an early bandwagon

[on whom?]

at this point.

I don't understand what you're saying here and I'm pretty sure I'm not reading this properly.
In context with the above quote, this seems like you're looking for a bandwagon on

yourself

... not hiphop.

[Vi]

EBWOP:

I currently prefer my current approach

This is what happens when you accidentally sound too pretentious. My eyes hurt rereading this.