because Crimmy is no longer my top suspect. That honor now belongs to McGriddle, but only just. I'm not ready to put him at L-1 yet though, so I'll be content with putting him at the top of my scum list.
I'll post more tomorrow. Work is calling.
"If you are going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh. Otherwise they'll kill you."
McGriddle, it seems you have forgotten you simply jump at bandwagons "without" an apparent reason, and when you start bandwagons, you don't give reasons, just "gut feelings" as one could call them.
As such, it could be that you're simply thinking of bumping people off without any reason, other than the fact that they either are inactive, or because they "sound suspicious".
In this game, it's almost hard evidence, or nothing. You seem to give nothing, and as such that's why you have jumped to the top of the scummy list for me as well.
~ With the clicking came the Ticking
Of the site that was no more.
Quoth the server: 404. ~
So, based on all my observations (yeah, that's another reason why I stayed low for a bit), it seems Cades and McGriddle are the most suspicious ones. They're basically playing the "No, you're the scum" game.
McGriddle gives silly reasons to kill Cades, and he retaliates with even sillier reasons. However, it seems McGriddle is the most suspicious one, since he's the one who has been jumping around, throwing votes everywhere he goes.
The most suspicious thing about him? Whenever danger rears it's ugly head to him, he withdraws his vote, and goes for another one. Once more, silly reasons.
Cades, however, could have the newbie factor working against him. However, given the post he made, in which he accuses and votes for McGriddle, I can see he's saying random things to shake off the attention.
I can see him saying "you voted for me so they won't believe we're a team. Then I shall do so, too, and nobody will ever believe we're partners in crime."
The last, but not least, is that Cades also AtE a lot. Post 76 was a really huge AtE, but post 89 was an even bigger one.
"I was killed during night and I was a townie." Remember each game is a different one, and as such, that kind of defense is quite scummy.
So, I'm suspecting both of you, and though McGriddle is on top of the list, Cades is also rising in the ranks.
I shall post more on the subject when I can observe them better again.
And I'm keeping my vote until the very end, 'cause I really need to think.
~ With the clicking came the Ticking
Of the site that was no more.
Quoth the server: 404. ~
Crimmy wrote:McGriddle, it seems you have forgotten you simply jump at bandwagons "without" an apparent reason, and when you start bandwagons, you don't give reasons, just "gut feelings" as one could call them.
As such, it could be that you're simply thinking of bumping people off without any reason, other than the fact that they either are inactive, or because they "sound suspicious".
In this game, it's almost hard evidence, or nothing. You seem to give nothing, and as such that's why you have jumped to the top of the scummy list for me as well.
Lol I'm not trying to persuade anybody, nor am I band wagoning. I thought the post was scummy, and I even said that, I can't explain it to you people if you're just going to accuse me of bandwagon riding every vote I give.
Crimmy wrote:McGriddle, it seems you have forgotten you simply jump at bandwagons "without" an apparent reason, and when you start bandwagons, you don't give reasons, just "gut feelings" as one could call them.
As such, it could be that you're simply thinking of bumping people off without any reason, other than the fact that they either are inactive, or because they "sound suspicious".
In this game, it's almost hard evidence, or nothing. You seem to give nothing, and as such that's why you have jumped to the top of the scummy list for me as well.
Lol I'm not trying to persuade anybody, nor am I band wagoning. I thought the post was scummy, and I even said that, I can't explain it to you people if you're just going to accuse me of bandwagon riding every vote I give.
What do you mean, you can't explain it if we're accusing you? Is that some sort of blackmail/threat?
"Either you stop accusing me, or I won't explain why it's suspicious"?
You're digging an even bigger hole for yerself. This is, by far, the most scummy thing I've read right now.
~ With the clicking came the Ticking
Of the site that was no more.
Quoth the server: 404. ~
Lol way to read it out of context. It was meant as in if you can't understand why I vote someone after I explain it then it's your problem, and then you accuse me of riding a bandwagon because of it.
McGriddle wrote:Lol way to read it out of context. It was meant as in if you can't understand why I vote someone after I explain it then it's your problem, and then you accuse me of riding a bandwagon because of it.
I didn't read it out of context. If you wanna support the town, you give the information you have.
If they don't understand it, give it again in simpler terms.
What do you say?
"I can't explain it to you people if you're just going to accuse me of bandwagon riding every vote I give."
Maybe I said it wrong, and I meant to say: "Unless you guys don't vote for me, I won't explain why I'm doing what I'm doing".
Once more, if you're pro-town, give information.
You said it yourself: "If you don't understad [...]"
So, if we don't understand, fetch the bone in a simpler way, so people WILL understand..
~ With the clicking came the Ticking
Of the site that was no more.
Quoth the server: 404. ~
McGriddle wrote:Uhm I had 3 people and almost 4. And to answer your question, He made an obvious "oh look at me! I am being sarcastic about being a scum" post. That's a dead give to me. My opinion is that it was obvious.
are you talking about me being sarcastic?
anyway, not much has happened so not much to discuss.
On that note, post 104 is the most scummiest thing I have ever read in this game, so
Unvote; Vote: McGriddle
McGriddle, you are now at L-1. Claim.
I remember saying something about that, yeah...
"And I'm keeping my vote until the very end, 'cause I really need to think."
There's still lot's of time until the deadline comes, and I really don't wanna rush things, especially since we could be lynching a townie. I still want to think (and I want others to think as well.)
~ With the clicking came the Ticking
Of the site that was no more.
Quoth the server: 404. ~
*watches crimmy hammer when CSL just said not to*
Mcgrill, you have almost never given explanations for your votes untill after much pressure, and even then, they're pretty lame reasons. Your attitude of 'if you can't understand my super-vague, unspecific explanations, then too bad for you...' is distinctly and glaringly scummy. In fact, it's also mean. Cades, is english your first language?
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16
If this has even so much as piqued your interest or you'd like to talk, please send me a PM. Even if it's to disagree, insult me, or just to say you're sick of reading the verse, I'm glad to listen.
yes it is, why?
and also, I didn't realize I was posting so late, I didn't read this page, I thought I was posting on the last. sooooooooooooooooooo
and not that I want to rush a lynch, but I don't know why you hold your vote so long, I'd rather the rounds go quicker, but it is your vote.
----
Cades, however, could have the newbie factor working against him. However, given the post he made, in which he accuses and votes for McGriddle, I can see he's saying random things to shake off the attention.
----
that is partly true, when I voted McGriddle I was thinking of saying, I wonder if they will take their votes off me now, and they did, which is why I'm suspicious of Jack and CSL still. CSL keeps following Jack, and when I voted Jack he voted me, and when I voted someone else he took his vote off. That is suspicious.
But for now, McGriddle is on the hot seat, so if I he shall die, and I die in the night, my guess is CSL and Jack as the mafia.
If you are saying I revenge voted you, please listen more carefully. I gave some
very
excellant reasons for voting you. If I were following you to make you look scummy, is it your fault? No. His 'following' has little to do with my scumness or lack thereof, unless you have other arguments.
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16
If this has even so much as piqued your interest or you'd like to talk, please send me a PM. Even if it's to disagree, insult me, or just to say you're sick of reading the verse, I'm glad to listen.
I am sorry if my posts sound mean or scummy, like I have said, I am new to this game (VERY new) and I am still learning how to get tells from people without sounding scummy, doing pretty bad, but my point is, I really don't know how to explain myself without sounding scummy. I have read tutorials and everything but I still have no idea. But if there is one thing I am trying to tell you is that I am working very hard at being pro-town, and I never meant to be a jerk.
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16
If this has even so much as piqued your interest or you'd like to talk, please send me a PM. Even if it's to disagree, insult me, or just to say you're sick of reading the verse, I'm glad to listen.
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16
If this has even so much as piqued your interest or you'd like to talk, please send me a PM. Even if it's to disagree, insult me, or just to say you're sick of reading the verse, I'm glad to listen.
