xvart wrote:gg scum. You guys earned that win. I haven't read the scum QT yet, but I think reading the paranoia during the last night will at least provide some small shred of satisfaction.
Thanks. To be honest, I'm kind of disappointed that MacLock wasn't an unblockable, unkillable SK who vigged Confucius last night. All that scheming for nothing.
MacavityLock wrote:Everyone who voted for name claim sucks.
I don't get the people who voted for nameclaim either. And I REALLY don't get the people who screamed that it was a terrible idea and voted/FOSed Kinetic for the suggestion...yet suddenly voted in favour of a nameclaim without explanation. Actually...sorry, town, but I don't get half of you. All the VIs and easy targets made this victory feel a bit hollow. (Seriously, when a roled townie posts, "Yay, my death helped the scum!" in the graveyard topic, that's a sign that he should be blacklisted from all future games. He's breaking site rules.)
I feel for the sane townies in this game. Glad I wasn't in your shoes.
Kinetic wrote:Two things I loved. With a little bit of bait Seacore was the one who "lead" the push for nameclaiming. Once he started championing the cause I pulled back and played it close to my chest. Didn't want to seem too eager, but also trying not to contradict myself. In many ways I got the benefit of it, but I didn't get the brunt of the scummieness. Admittedly I played pretty shady, but half of that was intentional. If I was heavily called on it I would have played the "last few games I was town I got killed day 1, so I'm trying to act scummyish to avoid NKs" card.
What I don't get is that everyone kept calling Kinetic scum, but no one ever tried to lynch him. Usually, I think being brazenly antitown isn't worth the risk. (Personally, my style as scum is just to act as protown as possible and attack scummy townies, because I hate being suspected.) But in this game, Kinetic's plan worked wonders, particularly since so many townies' behaviour WRT the nameclaim was more suspicious than Kinetic's own.
xvart wrote:As I mentioned in the graveyard QT, I claimed Coldhands because I was trying to draw the NK by appearing to be a third party.
But if you were third-party, wouldn't we be
less
likely to kill you? Odds are you'd be a BP SK or a survivor (who'd help the Mafia).
Speaking of which, had Raivann not been lynched D2, I'd have probably pushed to nightkill him because of these quotes:
Raivann (AKA the prominent and powerful Robb Stark) wrote:If your scum who are you gonna kill at night?
Answer: The characters who are more prominent and powerful.
All this is gonna do is out PR's!
Raivann wrote:If we are to believe Seacore with his VT claim, which I do atm, then Kinetic's theory of everyone having some sort of power role is wrong.
Were they intentional attempts to look roled?