Mini 925: Umineko No Naku Koro Ni Mafia: GAME OVER!

[RayFrost]

unvote, vote: navycherub

reaction to leech's vote seems scummy.

I didn't vote for Navy.

I meant DisCode.

[UncertainKitten]

The Fourth "Answer" Vote Count

"Uu~ Uu~!"

Mod Note: Leech has clearly picked up his prod

0. UncertainKitten (4): Leech, Snow_Bunny, Kairyuu, Col.Cathart
1. Cobalt (1): CSL
2. RayFrost (0)
3. Col.Cathart (0)
4. DisCode (0)
5. Snow_Bunny (0)
6. Tarhalindur (0)
7. Kairyuu (0)
8. mangus_orion (0)
9. Leech (0)
10. TheLonging (0)
11. NavyCherub (2): DisCode, RayFrost
12. CSL (1): Cobalt
13. the Kakera (1): Navy Cherub

Not Voting (3): Tarhalindur, mangus_orion, TheLonging

UncertainKitten is at L-3

With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch
Deadline is in 12 days at 11 AM EST, Friday, March 5th

[Cobalt]

What dead scummy play(s) are you referring to?

none?

[TheLonging]

What dead scummy play(s) are you referring to?

none?

so why say you voted for him for dead scummy plays

[Cobalt]

dead means very you illiterate buffoon

[CSL]

No, no, dead means none, in my opinion at least. Uu~!

I'm actually looking at the Visual Novel for this. Pretty sweet if you ask me.

[TheLonging]

dead means very you illiterate buffoon

I don't think you understood what I ment

[NavyCherub]

Why do you suspect that your level of agreement is his reason for voting you?

I don't, but there's nothing about anything else in his post that I can respond to in relation to myself...and this is like the third time I've said this using different words. >.<

[Leech]

I don't think you understood what I ment

Why did you feel the need to post that, without a clarification?

The point, Cobalt, is that you said you changed your vote for scummy play. I asked what scummy play, and you said none. So, what meaning is behind your vote?

[CSL]

I don't think there's any meaning by his vote. He needs to stop beating around the bush, and be reasonable. Uu~!

[magnus_orion]

@CSL: Yeah, mind demonstrating to cobalt how to be reasonable

by answering my question?

[UncertainKitten]

Kairyuu has been prodded with a stake of purgatory

[Cobalt]

The point, Cobalt, is that you said you changed your vote for scummy play. I asked what scummy play, and you said none. So, what meaning is behind your vote?

What?

[Leech]

I cannot believe how much trouble you're making this.

I'm not voting you for policy anymore, I'm voting you for dead scummy play.

What dead scummy play(s) are you referring to?

What dead scummy play(s) are you referring to?

none?

So, why did you vote for Navy? You said it's not policy anymore, but when asked about said "Scummy play" you said there wasn't any.

[RayFrost]

cobalt is voting CSL, leech.

[Leech]

Yeah, I know that. For some reason the "Navy" name stuck in my mind when I quoted my original post asking about the scummy play. This is why I normally don't post after work before getting sleep.

[Kairyuu]

/prodded

Still want a mod lynch.

Discode is an idiot.

Cobalt and CSL are playing exactly as expected.

That is all.

[UncertainKitten]

Probably not going to be online for the rest of today. My father is a totalitarian fucknut. That is all.

[DisCode]

Why I'm voting Navy is very easy. Did nobody see this post:

Going with the flavor, UK would be the 13th player (player 0) and confirmed town (as she is fully cleared).

So you want to lynch confirmed town. It just doesn't make any sense to lynch her

.

Navy seems FL (

UK will always be FL to me

) as ObvTown. Nothing wrong with that, except that it's wrong. But that's not the point. The point is the bolded.
Everytime I see that quote, I want to add 4 little words at the end of the bolded part: 'if you are town'
In other words, 4 players have done something scummy to him, of which 3 players did it before the quoted post. And he's letting it slip by. Vote worthy to me.
Also, in response to this:

I was almost at the point of being irritated about who to vote between a few players. But then I saw Navy and he saved me from this aweful dilemma,

Vote NavyCherub

That doesn't make any sense, so far I seem to have been in full agreement with you.

If agreeing should make me look positive at you, does that mean that when somebody disagrees with you, you'll look negative at it or not? And why?
(For Navy^^)


Also, CSL, why is Cobalt scummy for supporting a policy lynch on you?


Last, Kai is scum based upon personal impression of him during previous games.

[magnus_orion]

Discode, could you elaborate on what you said about Kairyuu?
Is there anything in particular that sticks out?

Discode is an idiot.

*blink*
Why?

Still want a mod lynch.

We need to figure out if
1. UK is "in" the game
2. If she is acting as a player, or if her being lynched has some affect on the game instead

If she is acting as a player, then she is more likely than not a neutral role. But she could instead have other affects on the game.
(Tar did this in Mind Screw 2, right?)
And, of course, the possibility remains open that lynching her is just a waste of a lynch.


I'd like to hear Navy respond to discode, actually...

[CSL]

I just don't like policy lynches. I'm voting Cobalt for not answering a question made to him, and ignoring it. I say that's anti-town. Uu~!

[Snow_Bunny]

Meh, CSL and Cobalt are getting a bit annoying with their discussion. Seems more like they're trying to separate themselves. And, with Leech's last quotes of Cobalt's responses, this seems more pausible.

@Discode: You're Navy's case seems interesting enough, but I quite don't get it. You're saying Navy is scum because he

knows

UK is confirmed town, right?

[magnus_orion]

@Snow_bunny: you find it interesting... but you don't understand it?

discode is saying that if Navy thinks that the actions don't make sense from a town perspective, why isn't she voting the people making those actions, because its logical to conclude if the action doesn't make sense from town, then they have scummy motivations.

[Snow_Bunny]

See? I find interesting the case, if I'm getting it right. It seems I wasn't, though, but it's still interesting.

[NavyCherub]

Navy seems FL (

UK will always be FL to me

) as ObvTown. Nothing wrong with that, except that it's wrong. But that's not the point. The point is the bolded.
Everytime I see that quote, I want to add 4 little words at the end of the bolded part: 'if you are town'

I thought it was implied to be quite honest, I'll be more blunt from here on out.

In other words, 4 players have done something scummy to him, of which 3 players did it before the quoted post. And he's letting it slip by. Vote worthy to me.

See, I know where you're coming from now. My voting habits simply aren't so aggressive that I would lay a new vote down every time I see someone do something suspicious. Aside from that, I didn't find it inherently scummy until recently, I was just trying to take some focus off of the idea because I didn't like it (that obviously backfired). The fact that it is still a major idea being tossed around is beginning to make me reconsider how to view the situation and the people who are currently voting. UK might not be clear (alibis mean nothing, I should have known this), but I still see it as a waste of a lynch right now.

If agreeing should make me look positive at you, does that mean that when somebody disagrees with you, you'll look negative at it or not? And why?

No, if someone disagrees with me I won't automatically see them in an entirely negative light, as you can see from my lack of a vote when I disagreed with the idea of lynching UK. But I never said that agreeing with me should make you see me positively; your post simply didn't contain anything that I could see as a reason for your vote on me (other than that you clearly found me scummy for a reason you didn't list).