I would say its more about avoiding a simple question than it being specifically due to having an alt. Not answering questions is hardly ever a townish thing to do.Cirno wrote:Mister, if this is about the alt, you are fighting for a lost cause.crypto wrote:Unvote. Vote: Cirno.
She's avoiding a question and rightfully so, because it is not necessary that we know who she's an alt of. I don't go around telling people my old account.Musher333 wrote:I would say its more about avoiding a simple question than it being specifically due to having an alt. Not answering questions is hardly ever a townish thing to do.Cirno wrote:Mister, if this is about the alt, you are fighting for a lost cause.crypto wrote:Unvote. Vote: Cirno.
Would be interested in hearing an answer to that question anyway.
Not sure how the risk could be minimised. However, I may wait a few more nights to see what else I can get.RichardGHP wrote:@Everyone: If you are a cop with a guilty on Day 1, do you out yourself and risk getting NK'd or do you wait until you have minimum risk of being killed?
Generally a bad idea - unless that person's playstyle is particularly disruptive to my respective faction.farside22 wrote:What is your view on policy lynching?
I think it's largely equal. People may lurk for multitudes of reasons, but when I do it, it's never role-related. I might not be bothered to catch up, or have RL issues.farside22 wrote:Do you think scum or town lurk more?
Varies. But I'll pop on a few times a day.farside22 wrote:How active are you here at MS?
Why do you think this particularly scummy? Do you not think a little suspicion is better than nothing at all?jbernier93 wrote:WOW that's kinda premature in my opinion. Actually very very premature. fos:horrordude
I'm not saying this specific case is anti town, more that normally if you sidestep around a question your better giving an answer including something along the lines of "That question isn't helpful in this game so i won't answer it".Ythan wrote:I don't like that you're portraying this incident as anti-town denial of information.Musher333 wrote:I would say its more about avoiding a simple question than it being specifically due to having an alt. Not answering questions is hardly ever a townish thing to do.
The phrasing threw me off a bit, i find straight forward answers much easier to understand and much easier to put in a discussion. Each to their own on how you speak i guess.Ythan wrote:How does this differ significantly?Cirno wrote:You are pretty rude, mister! Asking a girl about her alt is the same as asking her about her age! Have some tact, please!
Also I swear her avatar just changed.
A serious vote (which is what I took horror's as) against farside for not liking the hypothetical role question is in my opinion premature, and therefore, worthy of a little suspicion. Hense, I fos'd him, as opposed to voting. If I were to vote horror dude, I would be hypocritical, as I would be prematurely putting a serious vote on him.molestargazer wrote:Why do you think this particularly scummy? Do you not think a little suspicion is better than nothing at all?jbernier93 wrote:WOW that's kinda premature in my opinion. Actually very very premature. fos:horrordude
No, I think that it is scummy enough to warrant an fos. It was scummy, but not scummy enough to warrant a vote, thus if I had voted him, I would've been doing the same thing he did.molestargazer wrote:@jbernier - So you do think that it's scummy enough to warrant a vote, but you think that doing so right now would be hypocritical?
