@ AV: yeah, I think three people have yet to post. Hiphop (SE) Jerako (New) and Nacho (IC)
For the next few hours I'm going to be silent, I want more people to join first. I will answer game questions though, if need be.
Yes, thanks, Pulindar.Pulindar wrote:he's asking if you thought of the four people on him two were mafia.AurorusVox wrote:I'm not quite sure what you're asking here...Die Prediger wrote:Both Mafia had already voted in me, so they couldnt give the final vote? And not giving it, assuming the one that could've give it was the mafia???
Die Prediger probably (though I won't say for sure) thought your vote was on him.
You are imagining too much, dont you think? I could say you are doing the exact same thing with [no], when you say we can be partners, you are distancing yourself from him. Am I wrong?Pulindar wrote:I'd just like to say, that I don't like the way either of them have gone about things. I think there is a good possibility that [no] got worried and was bussing his partner, or maybe just distancing. I dunno. Still, suspicious.
FoS [no] & Die Prediger
Anon accuses me of being a Mastin alt. (I am not) heheVel-Rahn Koon wrote:Official "OMG You People Talk A Lot!" Vote Count
[no] wrote:Partially, yes. But I won't bandwagon if i don't think it has any sense to it. I also thought that possibly the previous users who were voted before him were potential scum and therefore didn't want to vote for them, but then i realized i was one of them (and i am not scum) so...
You seem to be suggesting that you wouldn't have placed your vote on DP without being quite certain that he's scum. You have given two reasons, the first, being that his avoidance of L-3 is a scumtell. And the second, which is quoted here. What do you think of the opinions that have been raised that your first point is a weak one? Also, you yourself seem to be unsure of the validity of your second point as well. Are you questioning this decision, also?[no] wrote:What I meant by that is now i question the decision.
There however is also Die putting some kind of FOS on Aurorus for answering a question intended for someone else. Or is that just paranoia?
This is my first game ever technically, I played a game of drug dealer once with a group of about 15 or so people... though I don't think that counts.@Newer players
It's my understanding that nobody here is in their first game ever. What mistakes did you make in your previous games, if any, and what did you learn from them?
I do hope you include yourself on that list. Here's a question for you to help you in that process; Whom do you currently find most scummy and why?silverbullet999 wrote:Hrmmm these past few hours have been interesting. Though I'd like to hear the other players soon.
By dint of my slot, if not my personal opinion, I shall presume these are the questions you intended for me.Jerako wrote:@Experienced players:
Do you prefer playing as mafia or town, and why?
From the threads I was trying to read inbetween my last game ending and this one, I've come to the conclusion that there really is no such thing as a "scumtell". As in, there's never something that you can look at and say "He did X, so he's definitely scum". Would you agree? Whether you do or not, what is your personal approach to scumhunting?
The second one I think could be a FOS is because it's an obvious superfluous accusation [IMO]. But I don't think that's enough to make a decision.Jerako wrote:And finally, @[no]:
[no] wrote:Partially, yes. But I won't bandwagon if i don't think it has any sense to it. I also thought that possibly the previous users who were voted before him were potential scum and therefore didn't want to vote for them, but then i realized i was one of them (and i am not scum) so...You seem to be suggesting that you wouldn't have placed your vote on DP without being quite certain that he's scum. You have given two reasons, the first, being that his avoidance of L-3 is a scumtell. And the second, which is quoted here. What do you think of the opinions that have been raised that your first point is a weak one? Also, you yourself seem to be unsure of the validity of your second point as well. Are you questioning this decision, also?[no] wrote:What I meant by that is now i question the decision.
There however is also Die putting some kind of FOS on Aurorus for answering a question intended for someone else. Or is that just paranoia?
I guess I would currently say die but only in the slightest. Simply from his reaction to your questioning. If die ended up getting lynched and it was shown he was a townie (Death's show whom that person was, right?) Then I would be somewhat suspicious of you and no. You for starting the flame against him and no for the vote with no reason.I do hope you include yourself on that list. Here's a question for you to help you in that process; Whom do you currently find most scummy and why?
Do you or do you not still suspect Die is scum?[no] wrote:I'm going to unvote for now
Deaths do show results of town/scum/role in Newbie games (and generally in all games on Mafiascum though I have seen exceptions.silverbullet999 wrote:If die ended up getting lynched and it was shown he was a townie (Death's show whom that person was, right?) Then I would be somewhat suspicious of you and no. You for starting the flame against him and no for the vote with no reason.
Two reasons.Thor wrote:1. What do you see as the benefit in asking generic theory questions to players as opposed to specific questions about the game? Asking me these generic questions will bring you no closer to getting a read on my actions in this game, and whether I am scum or town I am likely to answer them the same way. What's the gain?
Not that I think2. Why no vote yet? Do you not think any useful information has come forth at this point?
I don't think I have enough info yet. I am however keeping watchThor665 wrote:Do you or do you not still suspect Die is scum?[no] wrote:I'm going to unvote for now
It is possible he is just trying to get some useful reaction out of him. And now I do think an early lynch may be a bad idea, even if I do have confidence.Thor665 wrote:If you don't what did he do to change your mind?
I think because its a what if scenario, he may have been added on (for me he just seemed to be hopping on and agreeing with you?). But since die hasn't been lynched and didn't flip town... and because pulindar unvoted first, he wasn't added.Why is Pulindar not on your list of people to suspect if Die flips town?
Just looked.... not sure how i missed that... well umm.... you are right... my apologies... (doing this while at work study is not good..)Thor actually unvoted first...
Its my 2nd game here, and 4th game in my "career".Jerako wrote: @Newer players
It's my understanding that nobody here is in their first game ever. What mistakes did you make in your previous games, if any, and what did you learn from them?
hello Silver!silverbullet999 wrote:Just looked.... not sure how i missed that... well umm.... you are right... my apologies... (doing this while at work study is not good..)Thor actually unvoted first...
Well that changes my mind completely, I'm gonna say I'm still slightly suspicious of die and no and that's it.
So, can you quote my answers to him (my reaction) and explain why they make you suspect of me? Cause i think youre the first to mention it...Thor665 wrote:Vote: Die Prediger
Intentional choice not to put someone at L-3? 'Hai guyz, I am not scum becauze I don't pile on votes in RVS'
Exact quote.
Our game got ruined by a replacement-newbie vanilla townie fake-claiming a guilty report on another vanilla-townie on D2 (turned out there were no PRs). The next day we lynched the fake cop claim, and it was gg mafia.Die Prediger wrote:Hey AV!AurorusVox wrote:Jerako, I'm a he, but I find it funny when people call me a she. I don't know why, but it happens a lot on mafia ._."
I won't answer the question about "my" last game since you were there too ^^
We werent there. Would you mind to tell us about it?
Because votes are the best and most easily traceable information. Also, I feel we already have a pretty good amount of information out there to be looked over for scumtells and couldn't figure out why you hadn't voted.Jerako wrote:Not that I thinknouseful information has come, but thatnot enoughhas come forth. I am still analyzing all of you, and I will place my vote when I have a reason enough to do so. It seems like you're trying to pressure me into voting. Why?
Why did you vote him earlier then? You either had enough information then or you do not have enough information now. If he was worth voting for then why isn't he worth voting now?[no] wrote:I don't think I have enough info yet. I am however keeping watchThor665 wrote:Do you or do you not still suspect Die is scum?
So, if I understand you correctly - someone starting a lynch wagon (me) = potential suspect.silverbullet999 wrote:I think because its a what if scenario, he may have been added on (for me he just seemed to be hopping on and agreeing with you?).
I already answered thisThor665 wrote:Why did you vote him earlier then? You either had enough information then or you do not have enough information now. If he was worth voting for then why isn't he worth voting now?[no] wrote:I don't think I have enough info yet. I am however keeping watchThor665 wrote:Do you or do you not still suspect Die is scum?