Mini 961: Insane Asylum II: GAME OVER :O!

[StrangerCoug]

@Glork: Voting for yourself is helping how?

I will answer this question as soon as you answer a question of mine:
Why is your vote still on known town?

This is blatant hypocrisy, for one thing. Chances are you know your alignment and win condition; you have no good reason for your vote either.

For another thing, you're

STILL

treating Iecerint as confirmed, i.e. nobody votes him; end of discussion. It's fine to think Iecerint is obvtown, and I admit the two concepts are related, but they're not identical.

Way to go completely out of your way to justify a boring vote by answering a question directly asked towards somebody else about their vote specifically.

I'm sure you'll call this OMGUS, but

Uvnote, Vote: StrangerCoug

. I don't see this type of zealotry as being likely protown.

The good news for you is that it's not really OMGUS. The bad news for you is that your vote on me is partially based on something not really a good tell either (that I'm being zealous about it). I can accuse you of being a zealot too, but it hasn't come to your head that it's illogical for town to consider Iecerint cleared. Definite knowledge of Iecerint-town requires the person that has it to be scum right now.

[Glork]

You crazy kids and your inability to understand hyperbole.

[Glork]

Also, your last statement is factually false. Theoretically, Iece and I could be mod-confirmed masons. Or I could be a Daycop. Or I could have role-based knowledge about him from some other means. Even if I weren't using hyperbole, the entire basis of your vote is inherently wrong.

[StrangerCoug]

Shoot me for my sense of humor not being all that good.

[StrangerCoug]

Also, your last statement is factually false. Theoretically, Iece and I could be mod-confirmed masons. Or I could be a Daycop. Or I could have role-based knowledge about him from some other means. Even if I weren't using hyperbole, the entire basis of your vote is inherently wrong.

That slipped my mind ><

Unvote: Glork

[UncertainKitten]

The Third "Stupid Sexist Psychologists" Vote Count

"The prevalence of BPD in the United States has been calculated as 1 percent to 3 percent of the adult population, with approximately 75 percent of those diagnosed being female."

0. UncertainKitten (4): Kairyuu, Snow_Bunny, Leech, CSL
1. CSL (0)
2. StrangerCoug (2): bv310, Glork
3. SocioPath (0)
4. farside22 (1): Iecerint
5. Glork (0)
6. Leech (0)
7. Tarhalindur (2): Slicey, SocioPath
8. bv310 (0)
9. Kairyuu (0)
10. Iecerint (1): farside22
11. Slicey (0)
12. Snow_Bunny (1): Tarhalindur

Not Voting (1): StrangerCoug

UncertainKitten is at L-3

With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch
Deadline is in 12 days at 3:00 PM EST, Monday, May 17th, 2010

[SocioPath]

Oh, right. I voted for myself because I didn't feel like

arbitrarily

voting for somebody else.

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

Also, your last statement is factually false. Theoretically, Iece and I could be mod-confirmed masons. Or I could be a Daycop. Or I could have role-based knowledge about him from some other means. Even if I weren't using hyperbole, the entire basis of your vote is inherently wrong.

Yes because in this game, given the title and theme and mod, that things like THAT would be SUPER LEGITMATE AND LISTENABLE TO.

First thing that comes to mind is OS Mafia, and I will treat information the same way, Mr. Death Miller.

Unvote
Vote: Glork

This wagon is a good wagon.

[StrangerCoug]

Could you go into a little more detail as to what you're talking about, SocioPath? I dropped my Glork case after he successfully (I feel) defended it, so your post comes off wrong to me.

[SocioPath]

Whats this?
A competing wagon...
Gah.
Decisions, decisions.

Unvote
Vote: StrangerCoug

[Iecerint]

SCSK, please revote when you unvote thanks. <3

[Glork]

[Yes because in this game, given the title and theme and mod, that things like THAT would be SUPER LEGITMATE AND LISTENABLE TO.

This is weak, even for you. I fully well know the nature of the game, but that does not discount the possibility of mod-confirmedness, which is exactly the point I was making. Furthermore, I've already stated that I was using hyperbole. It seems awfully silly to try to pile on the nonexistent GlorkWagon because of a statement (there are roles which can confirm innocence D1) which I made very clear was purely hypothetical.

[Glork]

Also, my use of "arbitrary" was completely correct. More correct than "random," in fact.

ar·bi·trar·y
   /ˈɑrbɪˌtrɛri/ Show Spelled [ahr-bi-trer-ee] Show IPA adjective, noun, plural -trar·ies.
–adjective
1.
subject to individual will or judgment without restriction; contingent solely upon one's discretion: an arbitrary decision.
2.
decided by a judge or arbiter rather than by a law or statute.
3.
having unlimited power; uncontrolled or unrestricted by law; despotic; tyrannical: an arbitrary government.

4.
capricious; unreasonable; unsupported:

an arbitrary demand for payment.
5.
Mathematics . undetermined; not assigned a specific value: an arbitrary constant.

Please learn to English language before firing off on stupid shit.

[SocioPath]

[Yes because in this game, given the title and theme and mod, that things like THAT would be SUPER LEGITMATE AND LISTENABLE TO.

This is weak, even for you. I fully well know the nature of the game, but that does not discount the possibility of mod-confirmedness, which is exactly the point I was making. Furthermore, I've already stated that I was using hyperbole. It seems awfully silly to try to pile on the nonexistent GlorkWagon because of a statement (there are roles which can confirm innocence D1) which I made very clear was purely hypothetical.

And yet SC took that and ate it up, to the point of using it as a reason to unvote you.
And even went so far as to point out how LEGITIMATE DEFENSE it was.
Anything you've done, is far outweighed by SC's dropping off you because of your silly statements.
BUDDIES? PERHAPS.

[SocioPath]

Also, my use of "arbitrary" was completely correct. More correct than "random," in fact.

ar·bi·trar·y
   /ˈɑrbɪˌtrɛri/ Show Spelled [ahr-bi-trer-ee] Show IPA adjective, noun, plural -trar·ies.
–adjective
1.
subject to individual will or judgment without restriction; contingent solely upon one's discretion: an arbitrary decision.
2.
decided by a judge or arbiter rather than by a law or statute.
3.
having unlimited power; uncontrolled or unrestricted by law; despotic; tyrannical: an arbitrary government.

4.
capricious; unreasonable; unsupported:

an arbitrary demand for payment.
5.
Mathematics . undetermined; not assigned a specific value: an arbitrary constant.

Please learn to English language before firing off on stupid shit.

That cute that you have the dictionary opened in front of you and still aren't literate enough to read it with comprehension.

[Iecerint]

I hate lynching Glorky.

I am thinking about it a little tho tbh.

[StrangerCoug]

SCSK, please revote when you unvote thanks. <3

I had no other strong scum read at the time,

BUT...

[Yes because in this game, given the title and theme and mod, that things like THAT would be SUPER LEGITMATE AND LISTENABLE TO.

This is weak, even for you. I fully well know the nature of the game, but that does not discount the possibility of mod-confirmedness, which is exactly the point I was making. Furthermore, I've already stated that I was using hyperbole. It seems awfully silly to try to pile on the nonexistent GlorkWagon because of a statement (there are roles which can confirm innocence D1) which I made very clear was purely hypothetical.

And yet SC took that and ate it up, to the point of using it as a reason to unvote you.
And even went so far as to point out how LEGITIMATE DEFENSE it was.
Anything you've done, is far outweighed by SC's dropping off you because of your silly statements.
BUDDIES? PERHAPS.

This is completely crap. Glork's statements are not silly; if they were, I would have left my vote alone. Anyone who does not see that Glork proved my statement about confirmed town wrong is blind, so I don't feel justified calling this attack of yours legitimate by any means.

Vote: SocioPath

[Glork]

Unvote, Vote: SocioPath

100% support.

[bv310]

Unvote, Vote: Sociopath

I can see the logic behind this wagon more so than the last one.

[Kinetic]

Just fair warning, UK totally let me help with this set up !

[SocioPath]

Am I the only one that sees the SC+Glork love here?
It is just so amazing.
Essentially its a massive "rolefish" debate back and forth...
...but thats fine with them...
...because no fishing is needed, cause they already know the other's role...
...and overplay their hand.
This silly distancing is silly.
I'm happy with a SC/Glork double lynch.

Vote: StrangeGlorkerCoug

[Glork]

ITT Socio really needs to work on his conspiracy theories. Also, he still doesn't understand the English language.

[Kairyuu]

Sleep is nice. I should probably try that sometime soon.

^^Me deciding I've stayed up too late as it is and to devote the 1-2 hours it'll probably take to do a proper catch up read and post will push me into "I may as well stay up, since the sun is already up" mode. Expect something after I sleep a few hours. Top priority. I promise.

[farside22]

Glork: You asked me why I'm voting for a known townie? Second you claimed a miller type roll so I'm find a daycop miller theory hard to swallow and seeing Iec's comment about thinking about lynching you leans me to not believe the other theory about mason role here.
Finally why would you vote yourself, whiling asking me why I'm voting a known townie? If your town why vote yourself knowing your own alignment?
Seems like a contradiction to me.

unvote:
vote: Glork

[Glork]

I've already explained that voting for myself was my way of not voting for anybody else. I didn't feel like putting a random vote on somebody else during the random voting stage. As soon as I found a suspect, I moved my vote off of myself.

There is no contradiction because my vote was a temporary, RVS, non-vote, while your vote was a serious vote with intended (if flawed) reasoning.

Also, please go back and read my "I don't know for a fact that Iece is protown, I was using hyperbole" comment from earlier.

[farside22]

So your question to me about voting for a known town was what?