Mini 1006: Random Mafia Game Over!

[Exe]

Helping eachother? I do not remember helping Vezo.

I believe Vezo's claim. For now. I do not think he leans heavily towards town, but his reaction made sense to me.

What is wrong with that?
I am not saying I

will

be opposed to lynching Vezo. I am saying I

am

opposed to lynching him this moment based purely on his claim.
That is all. No more, no less.
If he continues to act scummy, I will have to re-evaluate.

However, there is nothing wrong with removing my vote from Vezo based on the fact that I am not satisfied with lynching him when our only evidence is a strange claim.

[Espeonage]

They will do A, C or D or E.
A - They will stay the same and protect each other which tells us they are stupid no matter what their alingment is.
C - They turn on each other. They are scum for submiting to what the town wants.
D - They start attacking someone for attacking them. And of one of them is scum and the other isn't they have tried to set up a chainsaw defence.
E - They give jackshit, ignore the question and be happy in their little scum bodies because they know that we still don't know if both of them are scum and who the others (if there are any) are. Btw. I'm going to place a bet on that one of them is a traitor and the other worked it out fairly quickly.

If they were smart they would start being all defensive about motivations in questions and how we are setting them up to frame themselves.
In the case they are both town. We should quicklynch and get some sort of investigative role to investigate the other.
Either way we should quicklynch.

[Mitsuru Kirijo]

Looks like Exe hasn't done that.

Vote: Exe

L-1

[Espeonage]

So E it is.
ninja'd

[Mitsuru Kirijo]

It seems to me like Exe is protecting Vezo, yet keeping him at arm's length so as not to be linked to closely together.

[Espeonage]

In which case he doesn't give a rats and is being ignorant of the true meaning of the question.

[Exe]

Espeonage gives 4 possible responses all of which indicate that one or both of us is scum.
Logical fallacy.
You claim to have given all possibilities for my response, yet that is clearly impossible seeing as you leave no possibility that I am town.

Perhaps the correct answer is what really happened.
I voted for pressure hoping to get a response from Vezo.
The response I got led me to unvote him until there is further evidence.

Interesting that MK proposed the question towards me, and yet he let Espeonage determine the answer.
Reads as MK cheerleading. Probability of MK-scum increased.

[xvart]

They will do A, C or D or E.
A - They will stay the same and protect each other which tells us they are stupid no matter what their alingment is.
C - They turn on each other. They are scum for submiting to what the town wants.
D - They start attacking someone for attacking them. And of one of them is scum and the other isn't they have tried to set up a chainsaw defence.
E - They give jackshit, ignore the question and be happy in their little scum bodies because they know that we still don't know if both of them are scum and who the others (if there are any) are. Btw. I'm going to place a bet on that one of them is a traitor and the other worked it out fairly quickly.

If they were smart they would start being all defensive about motivations in questions and how we are setting them up to frame themselves.
In the case they are both town. We should quicklynch and get some sort of investigative role to investigate the other.
Either way we should quicklynch.

I think this is getting a little too complicated, with the traitor assumption and all. I think that could be considered reaching a little. How about we just lynch Exe scum since he is most likely scum regardless of Vezok alignment.

Interesting that MK proposed the question towards me, and yet he let Espeonage determine the answer.
Reads as MK cheerleading. Probability of MK-scum increased.

So

Option D

?

xvart.

[Espeonage]

Mixture. it is leaning toward E seeing as he didn't really answer the question.

@EXE: One of you is going to die today. Scum or no.

[Mitsuru Kirijo]

Exe is scum that cracked under pressure. I think his newbishness just made him go defensive and try to buddy up to Vezo.

[Exe]

In what way didn't I answer the question?
Vezo leans on the town-side of neutral. There really isn't much more to say. His claim was suspicious but his reaction to my vote gave me enough confidence to unvote him until I have more evidence of scum than "bad claim."

[xvart]

In what way didn't I answer the question?
Vezo leans on the town-side of neutral. There really isn't much more to say. His claim was suspicious but his reaction to my vote gave me enough confidence to unvote him until I have more evidence of scum than "bad claim."

"Town side of neutral"? That is quite a bit different than:

Your claim is true, though still stupid.

then:

His post that suggests town

then:

I was not calling him obvtown, nor was I excusing him from future suspicion. I only intended to say that for now I believe his claim.

I believe this is the time you are supposed to claim, unless you are still trying to think of a fake claim.

xvart.

[Espeonage]

EXE is obvscum. Vezo may not be.

[Exe]

Those quotes are not contradictory. It is simply the way I speak. However, there is no way for me to prove this, so defending myself is pointless.

I am the town bodyguard. I can protect one person each night, and in the event that the person is targeted by a kill, I die in that player's place.

[MafiaSSK]

Vote Count 1

Vezokpira: totallynotmafia
Totallynotmafia: Mitsuru Kirijo
Mitsuru Kirijo: Zajnet
AGar: Quadz08,Gandalf5166
Exe: Vezokpira,Espeonage,AGar,xvart,millar13

Mitsuru failed to unvote. Thus the vote does not count. Exe remains at L-2.

[Mitsuru Kirijo]

Unvote. Vote Exe

[Espeonage]

Unvote

[Mitsuru Kirijo]

Too quick a day for you? Or suspicious of someone else?

[Espeonage]

Neither

[Espeonage]

Wait. Question: How did people interpret the set-up judging by the post for the game in the sign-ups? This is an important question so humour me.

[Mitsuru Kirijo]

I can't find said post. Can you link/quote it for me, please?

[vezokpiraka]

I still believe Exe is scum. There is why my vote is on him. He said thoughts, thoughts only once in the game. That is huge scum tell for X.


You forgot case B.I still don't know what is that.

[quadz08]

@Espeon: I wasn't completely sure. I knew that it would provide for some crazy things, since it seemed like this game would be PR-heavy. I didn't completely understand how he was going to ensure balance, though the fact that he assigned alignments and roles separately has eased my mind somewhat.

Also, I'm assuming your explanation for your unvote is forthcoming after answers to your question. If not, please explain.

I think Exe's gambit was interesting. What I find much more interesting, however, is that vezok was magically cleared after just one question. I don't think a single post can possibly incriminate or clear someone so quickly.

HoS: Exe

I need some more evidence before a vote, but yeesh. You're certainly toeing the line, sir.

[Exe]

vezok was magically cleared after just one question

I would appreciate if people stopped putting their own spin on my post. Especially after I have explained in painfully specific detail that Vezok is

not

magically cleared.

[quadz08]

My apologies. Remove the advective.