Oh, I had forgotten you were even in this game...Nachomamma8 wrote:Unvote, Vote: DemonHybrid
Hows abouts somes contents ands explanations?
First bolded quote: Notice how I said otherwise. Spyre said I was stretching on my vote of SSBF, and my vote of SSBF was due to the Reck post.RayFrost wrote:Lies -SSBF has "discussed" the matter of lynching reck, how we should spend our time day by day, and the MPR wagon stuff (along with a style-wise attack on me).
You just have your MPR wagon stuff and this new attack on SSBF soon after people question / attack you about only focusing on MPR
Comparably... you would be scummy from your own standards.
So... "aside from the other things he's said, he's only said this" - really great argument here. I'm just blown away by your genius. Care to point out which reck post? If you are talking about the only one I've commented on, it cameDemonHybrid wrote: First bolded quote: Notice how I said otherwise. Spyre said I was stretching on my vote of SSBF, and my vote of SSBF was due to the Reck post.
And sure, he talked about how we should spend our time, but that post isn't really relevant to the scumminess of people nor who should vote who. It was merely a suggestion of how to use a minor mechanic of the game, so I didn't really consider it important.
Also: I never said that he's scummy ONLY because he's talking about those things and only those things. You're warping my words around a bit.
First bold: Logical clarification: I didn't say that he was scummy because and only because he was only talking about the MPR wagon and dictating RVS votes. Again, you missed the word "otherwise".RayFrost wrote:DemonHybrid wrote: First bolded quote: Notice how I said otherwise. Spyre said I was stretching on my vote of SSBF, and my vote of SSBF was due to the Reck post.
And sure, he talked about how we should spend our time, but that post isn't really relevant to the scumminess of people nor who should vote who. It was merely a suggestion of how to use a minor mechanic of the game, so I didn't really consider it important.
Also: I never said that he's scummy ONLY because he's talking about those things and only those things. You're warping my words around a bit.So... "aside from the other things he's said, he's only said this" - really great argument here. I'm just blown away by your genius.Care to point out which reck post?If you are talking about the only one I've commented on, it cameafteryour vote, so yah.
Fair enough.
I'm pointing out standards - you are as guilty for a limited quantity of discussion as SSBF is, and you've jumped ship from MPR as it shows it's not happening to SSBF right when pressure is mounting on him, which can be seen (and is being seen by me) as opportunistic wagon hopping.
Read again: "and my vote of SSBF was due toSuper Smash Bros. Fan wrote:@Korts: Keeping xRECKONERx alive until endgame will be a very daunting task to do. We do not want to lynch him for sure and we obviously cannot afford him to be NK'd. With no protection role for the town, scum is going to be hard-pressed to keep him around, especially if he were to give his all to help the town. Prehaps him being completely useless until endgame would help his chance of survival, as scums like useless townies, but we all know how much we hate useless confirmed townies.
Basically, the chances of xRECKONERx living to endgame is very, very slim.
However, while we don't want xRECKONERx to die, one benefit of his death by scums hand is that scum would have to give up one of there power role and become Mafia Goon. It would suck to see a confirmed townie die, but at least scum loses a power role, so that's something to gain from xRECKONERx's death.
Either way, the Town Power Roles should do nothing to him during the Night.
And I had another realization. With a Vigilante, if we lynch scum ToDay, kill scum ToNight, and lynch scum agan Tommorow, town wins. Yes, a Day 2 victory for the Town is possible. But we need to be completely accurate with lynching and the Vigilante killing scums and hope that the Vigilante doesn't die.
I didn't miss it. Your otherwise was in your first post in which you- bah, reread your post... I was reading it wrong. I blame having just woken up.DemonHybrid wrote:
First bold: Logical clarification: I didn't say that he was scummy because and only because he was only talking about the MPR wagon and dictating RVS votes. Again, you missed the word "otherwise".
It's not word twisting, it's misunderstanding. Learn the difference. "due to the reck post" was read (by me) as "due to the post made by reck" rather than "due to SSBF's post regarding reck" - can you see the room for misinterpretation here, now that I've made it obvious?hybrid wrote:Second bold: I'm talking about when SSBF was speculating on Reck, not any of Reck's posts. This one:
Read again: "and my vote of SSBF was due tothe Reck post." More word twisting.
1. could not the same be for SSBF?DH wrote:Third bold: Dude, my last post before that was when I asked MPR about the contradiction. First things first; I have a life and I do things, plus I'm in 4 other games, so I don't keep up fully with every post all the time. Second, SSBF hardly had any pressure on him whatsoever when I casted my vote. In fact, he has more pressure now than he's ever had before. Point out where pressure was building on him before I made my vote on him.
Yeah, lots of posts = the ability to take another minute to write something else. Humans are miraculous creatures and can really multitask + manage their time in amazing ways.RayFrost wrote:So lots of posts = lots of time?DemonHybrid wrote:SSBF contributed to a big chunk of this topic's posts. He's had time to talk about other things.
I guess that means lurkers are completely innocent if they only talk about a couple of things?
These are likely circumstances that would happen with xRECKONERx, not something that will happen. I am trying to find a conclusion that will be the most likely condition for xRECKONERx to actually survive and be able to help the town.DemonHybrid wrote:The first bolded quote: How does he know what scum's going to do? Furthermore,
that's -quite- a lot of speculation of the twist we have in this game.
So let me guess, you don't want to find an easy way out to get rid of all three scums? I am not asking the town to rush the Days, as explained before, I want to give the town plenty of time to find scums. On top of that, this would also force the town to find two scums in one Day, one to lynch and one to vig during the Night.DemonHybrid wrote:The second bolded quote: He seems to be very set on how long this game should last. Call it gut, but that kind of speculation subconsciously rings out as somewhat scummy to me. It shows eagerness for the game to be over.
I understand that I can't, but staying in RVS-land while everyone else is looking for scums is not something that I like. This encourages active lurking and gives us little to work on. I'm not going to harp on RayFrost for the RVS issue anymore since he's finally producing contents, but I didn't like his RVS post at the time.DemonHybrid wrote:RVS ends for different people at different times. You can't dictate when someone's RVS is over.
Wait a minute. You said that this entire post contained of wrongness, yet you said my response to socrates on my vote was fine. That indicates that not everything about my post is wrong, these two things kind of contradict each other. Defense below:RayFrost wrote:This entire post scream wrongness to me.The first 3/4 of the post is pretty much stating the obvious on not lynching immediately and not waiting until deadline. The whole 29% thing isn't very helpful either... seriously. It's an empty post up top.His response to socrates on his vote was fine, but his comment about MPR seems like a lot of stretching.
Exactly why do you think that I was skimming DemonHybrid's post? I was responding to the same quotes, but wanted to look at it more.RayFrost wrote:This looks like not reading hybrid's posts - it can be seen that hybrid said that he's concerned/worried about being lynched
Usually, accidental quick hammers happen within newbie games or intentional scum quick hammers. These put a lot of heat on the scum if they intentionally did it and they are usually lynched without hesistation. Sure there are exceptions to the rule, but considering nearly everyone here has some form of experience with Mafia, I honestly doubt people would be stupid enough to quick hammer.RayFrost wrote:I beg to differ on the first point - it's happened in the past... even in games I'm in. Second quote - two people can read the same thing and get something different out of it, your post implies the bandwagon will lead to a lynching, which would be the concern about the bandwagon in of itself (which I think is what MPR read as well)
We are not trying to kill xRECKONERx here. He is a confirmed townie and we should treat him as such.RayFrost wrote:If you do that, I reserve all rights to push for your death, mmmkay?
Based off the argument that arose between me and RayFrost, If I had to guess between which two people were the most likely of different alignments, it would be those two. I'm leaning town on DemonHybrid and leaning scum on RayFrost as I personally thought DemonHybrid's argument made more sense then RayFrost and I thought RayFrost's defense of me in some areas was pretty unecessary.Socrates wrote:How likely do you consider each other to be scum?
Can you explain this more? SSBF talked about the game being over quickly from the perspective of town ridding scum quickly, so I don't see how you jumped to the conclusion that he seemed eager to have the game over as a scumbag.Post 87, DemonHybrid wrote:The second bolded quote: He seems to be very set on how long this game should last. Call it gut, but that kind of speculation subconsciously rings out as somewhat scummy to me. It shows eagerness for the game to be over.
Because, on a subconscious level, it expresses the fact that he wants the game to be over regardless, which is non-conductive to a pro-town attitude. Sure, he posts it from the view as town wanting to rid scum quickly, however, I find it weird that he needed to express it in such a fashion and might be an attempt to just win over town instead of making a good argument against scum. Town shouldn't be focusing on the end of the game unless they have scum in their sights (as in, one more scum to kill between X amount of people) or it's a LyLo situation (both are high pressure situations); they should be focusing on who's scum and who isn't, and on a psychological level, it rings out asIncognito wrote:Can you explain this more? SSBF talked about the game being over quickly from the perspective of town ridding scum quickly, so I don't see how you jumped to the conclusion that he seemed eager to have the game over as a scumbag.Post 87, DemonHybrid wrote:The second bolded quote: He seems to be very set on how long this game should last. Call it gut, but that kind of speculation subconsciously rings out as somewhat scummy to me. It shows eagerness for the game to be over.