Mini #1022- PokeUPick(Game Over)

[gandalf5166]

I was questioning jimfinn because the mod had said only kanto/johto. Also, Prox, usually when players can kill, they are told their kill flavor, i.e. how their target will appear as having been killed in the morning. I was wondering, since if someone shows up the next morning as having been killed through said flavor, it will basically confirm Xine. Also, Xine is not confirmed yet. SK claiming vig is not at all uncommon. But water type is an unlikely SK role, so if that really is her role, then she should have a plausible kill flavor, and someone should show up as killed in that way if there are two NKs. If we have two NKs, but neither is the claimed kill flavor, then Xine is lying SK. PREVIEW EDIT: That said, it's clear that Xine was not told her kill flavor..... Presumably, we'll know in the morning.

[NicolBolas]

My reason why I asked- I was curious. Also, I saw in other theme games I read that sometimes knowledge of flavor can help.

Why did espeonage not claim yet?

[NicolBolas]

Ebwop- I missed that. Disregard my previous question.

[Espeonage]

I was asleep. Not my fault I live in Australia and slept in.

[NicolBolas]

Mmm...

Hello, everyone. Name claim time?

Also, I'd like to discuss the merits of immediately claiming a role that might mislead scans, instead of RVSing.

@prox- I want to know what you meant by the third part of your post?

[Xite91]

I was questioning jimfinn because the mod had said only kanto/johto. Also, Prox, usually when players can kill, they are told their kill flavor, i.e. how their target will appear as having been killed in the morning. I was wondering, since if someone shows up the next morning as having been killed through said flavor, it will basically confirm Xine. Also, Xine is not confirmed yet. SK claiming vig is not at all uncommon. But water type is an unlikely SK role, so if that really is her role, then she should have a plausible kill flavor, and someone should show up as killed in that way if there are two NKs. If we have two NKs, but neither is the claimed kill flavor, then Xine is lying SK. PREVIEW EDIT: That said, it's clear that Xine was not told her kill flavor..... Presumably, we'll know in the morning.

Unvote, Vote: Gandalf

For not reading, this is typically a scum trait

[NicolBolas]

By not reading, you are referring to gandalf's failure of noticing what type of kill flavor you would have?

Why would it be a scum trait?

[Espeonage]

Not the same reasoning behind my vote but still adds to the case. We have scum here peeps.

[gandalf5166]

I had read, I saw you post that multiple times, I just didn't understand why you were doing it. It just hit me what you were talking about.

[gandalf5166]

Wait, is Espeo joking? Because he hasn't posted any reasoning behind his vote at all.

[Prox]

Cases should be posted.

[NicolBolas]

What was your reasoning? Your vote seemed to be a random vote. Is this a effort to tack on a reason to your vote?

[gandalf5166]

Cases should be posted.

This. Voting without posting your reasoning is 100% sure to be unhelpful to town.

[Espeonage]

Cases should be posted.

lol. Cases should be posted if you have finished building the case. Why post a small case when you can wait a page or two so you can catch them doing the same thing again adn again and thus have a much more compelling case.

[Espeonage]

Cases should be posted.

This. Voting without posting your reasoning is 100% sure to be unhelpful to town.

Man just no.

[Espeonage]

Ok before I get misrepped. If the whole town acted then noting would get done but one or two people doing this helps town.

[NicolBolas]

You can post a small case and add to it. Right now, there's not much to go on, so any input can be helpful, no matter how small.

vote espeonage

for witholding reasoning.

Preview edit: I don't understand your last post

[gandalf5166]

So you vote first, and find excuses for your vote later? That does it,

VOTE: Espeonage

PREVIEW EDIT: Lulz at Espeo. "If everyone else did it, it would be anti-town, but me doing it isn't scummy at all." /confirm vote

[Xite91]

I had read, I saw you post that multiple times, I just didn't understand why you were doing it. It just hit me what you were talking about.

Uhm, after you were the one that asked about it? That seems a bit odd of a thing to slip through the cracks, no?
My vote stays.

Also, espionage, that usually works... if you don't vote for the person and just watch them, trust me, I'm a professional.
Case, plox

[gandalf5166]

Yes, but you didn't post an explanation for quoting something you had already said. I didn't see the lack of a kill flavor in that post as proof that you didn't receive one. So I wasn't sure why you were doing it.

[Espeonage]

Dude. Read. my case has nothing to do with that. I even said as much.

[NicolBolas]

Espeonage- then what is your case? Post it so the town can see your thought process

[gandalf5166]

I know it has nothing to do with that. Read yourself. I'm obviously responding to Xite, the post RIGHT ABOVE MINE. Personally, I don't think you even have a case.

[Xite91]

Yes, but you didn't post an explanation for quoting something you had already said. I didn't see the lack of a kill flavor in that post as proof that you didn't receive one. So I wasn't sure why you were doing it.

That, sir, WAS my kill flavour (as far as I'm aware)

[gandalf5166]

Well, in the morning, it isn't going to say, "gandalf5166 killed by water damage" in the morning.