BloodCovenent wrote:Whatever you say dekes. I follow a claim of you being ethan which makes sense as a scum role what else was i supposed to do, ignore it?
No, but you could question such a claim being made on page 3. Especially one with contradictions in it. On top of that he gets the most convinient result. Ethan is the
only
person in all of season 1 that can clearly be defined as evil (Smokey wasn't known at that point, the polar bear hardly counts and fake-bearded Tom only has a 5-minute appearance in S1). What a wonderful coincidence.
BloodCovenent wrote:You may call me opportunistic but it was no way opportunistic. I am, believe it or not rather good at keeping track of thresholds and if someone were to come in and vote quickly I would have unvoted to let the day evolve so that you had time to claim or rebuttal. No doubt I do agree that occasionally the third or fourth vote on a player can be opportunistic. However scum-bloodcovenent would blindly jump on a wagon as the late voter with no reasoning.
Well, I don't happen to have your scummeta on me. All I saw was you jumping on a wagon as a late voter with no reasoning...owait?
BloodCovenent wrote:Note that it doesn't make sense for Scum Vezo to so early give off a fake claim though. Because i would assume he knows that if you flip town, he will be ultimately hung tomorrow
Hence why I didn't vote vezo myself. I agree that I don't think vezo's incredibly stupid scum. But I have another theory coming up later in this post.
@HackerHuck
No, reasons, eh?
How about I didn't want to give away my role prematurely when I wasn't in imminent danger of being lynched (= L-1 and people threatening to hammer)?
Or how about people only wanted me to give out my name to test out vezo's claim?
And before you give me the crap I'm scum hinting at a PR but stalling with my full claim to come up with a proper fake claim. If this is indeed a vanillaless game, this tactic would make me not more valuable to town.
This is not a smear campaign or chainsaw defending. This is simply people being wary of an extremely sketchy claim early Day 1. No one said, I couldn't be scum and no one said vezo's claim has to be a lie. But blindly following such a claim instead of questioning it is imo rather done by scum than town.
And back to TL saying I was ignoring vezo. What would you call vezo's latest posts?
He's completely ignoring everything that's been directed at him and instead is giving an amazingly inaccurate description of Lost with the sole purpose of making Claire seem a good fake claim.
Why do you keep assuming that scum probably did get name fakeclaims? You seem to take it as a given fact. Do you have inside knowledge about this?
So, MoI's post gave me an idea. I thought about the day namecop getting wrong results and it wouldn't really work if he only gets the names. Would he get a different false name for every person? That would be hell of confusing. Or if he was - let's say - a paranoid cop, would he get only Ethan Rom as a result? That would be kind of boring.
So, I thought of the following option:
- Vezo, Ethan Rom, Lyncher gets the fake name claim Boone Carlyle (since he keeps bringing up there are likely mod-provided fake claims) and has the highly suspicious name Ethan Rom to frame his Lynchee, Claire Littleton, with.
Makes sense? In the context of the show (though Charlie would be a better analogy in terms of lynching, however, Claire is Ethan's main target after all) and in the context of this thread?
