a2rudeboy wrote:
@volk- why not throw it out there? just reading through a couple of times, it seems pretty clear to me that the two people who are most closely buddying up are jack and esp. they also happen to be the two players that are the most on the defensive now. i'm not sure if i've gotten good enough of a read on either yet...but if you asked me to pick my scumpair right now, it would be them. although there is the point about scum trying to stay neutral this early in the game, but being experienced they would know it and could use it as an easy defense if they chose to play it agressive, but... (endless WIFOM tunnel)
1) Where is the evidence for Jack buddying up to Esp?
2) Would it change your view of that evidence if I informed you that Jack's meta (from what I have seen of him, which has been quite a bit recently) is to play somewhat tongue-in-cheek?
CD wrote:
I really don't like the way those bolded parts read. Even if they are joking about it the rapid back and forth just gets my scum meter ticking up-ward.
What is scummy about a rapid back-and-forth?
Also, if you accept that they are bolded about the joking (and it's pretty obvious that they are), then what's your problem with "the way those bolded parts read"?
a2rudeboy wrote:Jack wrote:cooldog I claim scum, I'm scum with espeonage, your move
See. It's stuff like this and that exchange earlier that make me think that I would stand by a lynch on either of you guys, even if you turned up town. Because, at this point, if you aren't scum, you surely aren't pro-town (and it's not as if it's in your meta to play the VI) And that's enough of a reason for me.
See above - this really is meta-consistent for Jack.
NC wrote:
vote: DemonHybird
All the guy does is vote and then goes V/LA.
Golly gosh! Voting
and
going on VLA! He must be scum!