Open 258 --- Night Watch --- Game Over

[drmyshottyizsik]

Also that gets all my OMGUS out of the way

Apparently you lied here.

No I gave a reason

Me being "opportunistic" is not a reason, it's an excuse to OMGUS vote.

All reason are just justified excuses

[Antihero]

@shotty: Why is loc's vote "opportunistic"?

[drmyshottyizsik]

@shotty: Why is loc's vote "opportunistic"?

Because that was a really easy shot for scum to slip onto a wagon with a "reason", and push a mislynch

[nameloc1986]

@shotty: Why is loc's vote "opportunistic"?

Because that was a really easy shot for scum to slip onto a wagon with a "reason", and push a mislynch

So my first bandwagon deserved praise, but my bandwagon on you was opportunistic?

[drmyshottyizsik]

you learn quick

[nameloc1986]

you learn quick

Yep, I learned that you suck.

Anywho, I really don't want to get carried away with mindless squabbles during RVS. I'm gonna wait for others to post.

[Antihero]

@shotty: Why is loc's vote "opportunistic"?

Because that was a really easy shot for scum to slip onto a wagon with a "reason", and push a mislynch

...
Opportunism is the easiest thing for scum to accuse their wagoners of, because it usually involves vague generalities like this.

[drmyshottyizsik]

exactly so know we have gotten no where, and we are right where we started, also now there is a wagon on a town person, with no reasoning, and this sucks.
Also anti hero, your deffending of name is noted

[Antihero]

exactly so know we have gotten no where, and we are right where we started, also now there is a wagon on a town person, with no reasoning, and this sucks.

I don't know why you would say this.

Also anti hero, your deffending of name is noted

Yes. And....

[Zdenek]

exactly so know we have gotten no where, and we are right where we started, also now there is a wagon on a town person, with no reasoning, and this sucks.
Also anti hero, your deffending of name is noted

Wagons on town seem to be the way most games start.

When it comes to Shotty he jokes about being mafia and he seems to think that nameloc will later say that his "reason" is a real reason for getting on a bandwagon.

Vote Shotty

[curiouskarmadog]

drmy, I think I have only been in one game with you (did you replace in?)...you werent this chatty....but hey chatty is good, at least Day 1...

unvote, vote zdenek

, much rather start a wagon on scum than town.

[PogoStick]

drmy, I think I have only been in one game with you (did you replace in?)...you werent this chatty....but hey chatty is good, at least Day 1...

unvote, vote zdenek

, much rather start a wagon on scum than town.

how do you know the person you are voting for wasn't town

[Antihero]

how do you know the person you are voting for wasn't town

That's clearly not what CKD meant.

[nameloc1986]

exactly so know we have gotten no where, and we are right where we started, also now there is a wagon on a town person, with no reasoning, and this sucks.

1) Assuming that you are a town person

2) The reason is because it's RVS and bandwagons this early entitle a reaction. Usually that reaction can either say a little or even a lot.

3) "we are right where we started" - not necessarily true, but I agree that we haven't gotten too far. It's only the 2nd page and half the players haven't posted yet, what did you expect? Plus, saying this is fluff and doesn't add anything even to the RVS. If you really want to get somewhere, why not add something constructive.

[curiouskarmadog]

drmy, I think I have only been in one game with you (did you replace in?)...you werent this chatty....but hey chatty is good, at least Day 1...

unvote, vote zdenek

, much rather start a wagon on scum than town.

how do you know the person you are voting for wasn't town

are you serious?

[curiouskarmadog]

drmy, I think I have only been in one game with you (did you replace in?)...you werent this chatty....but hey chatty is good, at least Day 1...

unvote, vote zdenek

, much rather start a wagon on scum than town.

how do you know the person you are voting for wasn't town

did you read zdenek's post or are you just picking random posts to attack without really looking into them first?

[nameloc1986]

VOTE: Joystick

For a self-proclaimed "know-it-all" he sure doesn't know how to read and doesn't know the definition of RVS. Either that or he's scum.

[nameloc1986]

Woops forgot to unvote:

UNVOTE: shotty

VOTE: Joystick

[PogoStick]

VOTE: Joystick

For a self-proclaimed "know-it-all" he sure doesn't know how to read and doesn't know the definition of RVS. Either that or he's scum.

This is the first game I Started from the beginning and have not replaced in so no not sure what rvs means

[nameloc1986]

RVS (random voting stage) is what we are doing now. We're pretty much just voting for random reasons just to get the ball rolling. Bandwagons are usually formed to put early pressure on others and see how they react. Once we get some suspicions and discussions going, then we'll back out of RVS.

Another thing to do is RQS (random question stage).

Another RQ: Since I feel this may be an issue this game, what is everybody's stance on policy lynching?

[2003041]

clarifying: you mean 'lynch all lurkers', right?

[Zdenek]

RVS (random voting stage) is what we are doing now. We're pretty much just voting for random reasons just to get the ball rolling. Bandwagons are usually formed to put early pressure on others and see how they react. Once we get some suspicions and discussions going, then we'll back out of RVS.

Another thing to do is RQS (random question stage).

Another RQ: Since I feel this may be an issue this game, what is everybody's stance on policy lynching?

I think a policy lynch is a bad idea because it makes it hard to analyze the votes after someone is lynched, so it diminishes the information that can be gleaned at the end of the day, . . . but sometimes it sure is temping.

[PogoStick]

RVS (random voting stage) is what we are doing now. We're pretty much just voting for random reasons just to get the ball rolling. Bandwagons are usually formed to put early pressure on others and see how they react. Once we get some suspicions and discussions going, then we'll back out of RVS.

Another thing to do is RQS (random question stage).

Another RQ: Since I feel this may be an issue this game, what is everybody's stance on policy lynching?

Oh I got it, where I play the entire game contains random voting

as for policy lnching, depends on the policy

personally I'm a fan of quick day 1s and lynching VT on day 1 but that is just how I was taught, although I'm learning over here I am in the minority so adjusting my game has been interesting

[jasonT1981]

RVS (random voting stage) is what we are doing now. We're pretty much just voting for random reasons just to get the ball rolling. Bandwagons are usually formed to put early pressure on others and see how they react. Once we get some suspicions and discussions going, then we'll back out of RVS.

Another thing to do is RQS (random question stage).

Another RQ: Since I feel this may be an issue this game, what is everybody's stance on policy lynching?

Vote:Zdenek

OK, RVS vote made I will get down to business

Never been a fan of policy lynches to be honest, I prefer to lynch based on evedince against someone. RQS is something I have only seen a few times but it is an efficient way of starting a game and probably gets more discussion than a RVS given how people respond to questions.

[nameloc1986]

clarifying: you mean 'lynch all lurkers', right?

No I mean 'lynch an idiot'

My stance on policy lynching: Only if you think there's a chance there might be scum and only on Day 1.

My stance on lynching lurkers: Don't. At least wait and see if they're replaced first. Sometimes it can mean that they are disinterested in the game because they are VT. Therefore it's very circumstantial.