Mafia 121 -- Picking Simplicity Game Over

[Empking]

Thinking about it for a while, I think Glork's right. At the very least its better than nothing.

Unvote

Vote: LMP

[Antihero]

bark bark

VOTE: Haylen

[Nikanor]

Vote: -Empking.

Would any of you mind if I talked like t)(is wit)( t)(e )(s for t)(e rest of t)(e game?

Glork: If you're town, do you think it was a good idea to go around telling everyone what a great idea it would be for scum to shoot Jack tonight?

[Glork]

Vote: -Empking.

Would any of you mind if I talked like t)(is wit)( t)(e )(s for t)(e rest of t)(e game?

Glork: If you're town, do you think it was a good idea to go around telling everyone what a great idea it would be for scum to shoot Jack tonight?

I think that the scums are just as capable as anybody else at figuring out whether it's in their interests to shoot at Jack or not.

Not posting it doesn't mean that nobody else is thinking it. Don't even try this sort of non-logic with me.


That said, thank you for outing yourself as LMP's scumbuddy.

[Nobody Special]

Votecount 1.01

Haylen - 3 - Haylen, AGar, Antihero
Empking - 2 - Lowell, Nikanor
LynchMePls - 2 - Glork, Empking
Sudo_Nym - 2 - SnakePlissken, Xine
Agar - 1 - mothrax
Lowell - 1 - VasudeVa
mothrax - 1 - Jack
Nobody Special - 1 - UncertainKitten
UncertainKitten - 1 - LynchmePls

Not Voting: Azazel, CJMiller, eldarad, Far_Cry, Sudo_Nym, Yosarian2

With 20 alive, it takes 11 to lynch.

Deadline: November 17

Random notes:

--UKs vote for me is, obviously, uncountable. Shame!

--I interpret Rule #14 rather liberally. You know who you are.
--This is my first time Modding a Large Game. If I screw up the votecount, please DO say something!

[UncertainKitten]

--UKs vote for me is, obviously, uncountable. Shame!

Bullshit, it's totally countable. I count mod votes. Tar counts mod votes. What makes

you

too good to count mod votes >=[!!

[UncertainKitten]

EBWOP: Also, about Rule 14. What if you us RIGHT SHIFT?

[Nikanor]

Not posting it doesn't mean that nobody else is thinking it. Don't even try this sort of non-logic with me.

I wasn't thinking it and UK wasn't thinking it. If neither of us were thinking it, then nobody was!

That said, thank you for outing yourself as LMP's scumbuddy.

Quand sont les fromages?

What makes you too good to count mod votes >=[!!

I count mod votes. Tar counts mod votes.

[LimMePls]

OK, I'm pretty sure that was an awful idea plus I don't even think that it can kickstart discussion.

FOS; Jack

- Honestly I don't think I buy it (Don't think he should be today's lynch though.)

Do you think this makes sense as a scum gambit?

Honestly, yes. It won't last him to the end of the game of course but it would make him NK-Immune for a couple of days and allow him to lead the town until one of the real power roles kicked the bucket (and even then it would get the real role to come out and die before the next day.)

Oh, I see. You think Jack is basically making a move to out the power roles in exchange for his own inevitable lynch?

@Glork: What on earth does my asking Empking if he sees a scum motivation for Jack's play have anything to do with me being scum? I thought the claim looked clever, and I'm still not convinced it isn't.

[Nobody Special]

Votecount fixed by popular demand.

[LimMePls]

Vote: -Empking.

Would any of you mind if I talked like t)(is wit)( t)(e )(s for t)(e rest of t)(e game?

Glork: If you're town, do you think it was a good idea to go around telling everyone what a great idea it would be for scum to shoot Jack tonight?

I think that the scums are just as capable as anybody else at figuring out whether it's in their interests to shoot at Jack or not.

Not posting it doesn't mean that nobody else is thinking it. Don't even try this sort of non-logic with me.


That said, thank you for outing yourself as LMP's scumbuddy.

That's awesome. If you disagree with Glork you must be scum.

[SnakePlissken]

Welcome to the wonderful world of Mafia Scum with Jack...

[Empking]

Vote: -Empking.

Would any of you mind if I talked like t)(is wit)( t)(e )(s for t)(e rest of t)(e game?

Glork: If you're town, do you think it was a good idea to go around telling everyone what a great idea it would be for scum to shoot Jack tonight?

I think that the scums are just as capable as anybody else at figuring out whether it's in their interests to shoot at Jack or not.

Not posting it doesn't mean that nobody else is thinking it. Don't even try this sort of non-logic with me.


That said, thank you for outing yourself as LMP's scumbuddy.

That's awesome. If you disagree with Glork you must be scum.

You can't deny can you that Nikanor is one of the scummier players can you?

[LimMePls]

Sure I can. What exactly has Nikanor done that is scummy?

[Empking]

Oh, bugger I was just following Glork eh...

1. His non-direct attacks against Glork.
2. His silliness on page 4.
3. His ignoring of your own posts.

[AGar]

Claim:

either

doctor or cop, to get that out of the way.

With this setup they can't risk missing a kill on me so no danger in claiming...I will provide "results" or results after each day to keep it uncertain. I will also take suggestions or "suggestions".

and

Vote:Mothrax

FTR, I'd probably slit my own throat if I posted like that.

I've seen this before. It was a game I flaked on, great. I now have to go back and re-read a game I didn't even finish. Fuck you Jack, fuck you.

While I think about it:

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Glork

I know I've seen that before. Grawr.

Or we could wagon the mod to a lynch?

[eldarad]

/confirm

Jack: what's you'e facination with eldarad?

The more relevant question is: why are you not fascinated with me? Huh? HUH?!
Interesting fun fact - Jack was an IC in my very first newbie game on mafiascum.

I have no idea how to assess Jack's claim. I do have the urge to jump on a wagon though.

VOTE: LMP

[LimMePls]

Oh, bugger I was just following Glork eh...

1. His non-direct attacks against Glork.
2. His silliness on page 4.
3. His ignoring of your own posts.

1. Challenging something incorrect that Glork said is a non-direct attack?
2. The game is on page 3. I CAN HAZ UR TIME MACHINE?
3. Not particularly sure why this is scummy.

[Empking]

Oh, bugger I was just following Glork eh...

1. His non-direct attacks against Glork.
2. His silliness on page 4.
3. His ignoring of your own posts.

1. Challenging something incorrect that Glork said is a non-direct attack?
2. The game is on page 3. I CAN HAZ UR TIME MACHINE?
3. Not particularly sure why this is scummy.

1. "if your town" - with the implication (I thought) that's not town.
2. Page three then.
3. Because you're the scummiest player so it looks like he's trying to avoid a connection.

[UncertainKitten]

I wasn't thinking it and UK wasn't thinking it. If neither of us were thinking it, then nobody was!

Wow, by page 3. That's a new record.

Nika's answer decides my next action.

[Jack]

unvote, vote:Xine

I prefer less blatant swearing in games (unrelated to vote).

[Empking]

Oh, bugger I was just following Glork eh...

1. His non-direct attacks against Glork.
2. His silliness on page 4.
3. His ignoring of your own posts.

1. Challenging something incorrect that Glork said is a non-direct attack?
2. The game is on page 3. I CAN HAZ UR TIME MACHINE?
3. Not particularly sure why this is scummy.

1. "if your town" - with the implication (I thought) that's not town.
2. Page three then.
3. Because you're the scummiest player so it looks like he's trying to avoid a connection.

EBWOP: "If you're town"

[Haylen]

What's the case on LMP again? Like UK, I'm ignoring Jack's claim for now, continuing to talk about it is just going to push us into tunnel visioning Jack and allowing scum to coast through the game under the net.

Anti-hero, I lifted that post restriction ages ago!

[LimMePls]

I'm getting the feeling I'm about to enter a catch-22. If I say "oh you're right, Nikanor is trying to avoid a connection with me" then I'm admitting that avoiding a connection with me is somehow scummy. If I say "No, Nikanor isn't avoiding a connection with me" then you'll only take that as further evidence that we're distancing from each other. I don't see the behavior that way because I don't see any reason why someone would be distancing from me. I don't accept your premise that I'm the scummiest person in the thread.

I don't know what else to say. I don't think Nikanor has been scummy.

@Empking: What is scummy about Nikanor's sillyness on page

4

3?

[LimMePls]

What's the case on LMP again? Like UK, I'm ignoring Jack's claim for now, continuing to talk about it is just going to push us into tunnel visioning Jack and allowing scum to coast through the game under the net.

Anti-hero, I lifted that post restriction ages ago!

I didn't think Jack's "claim" was bad and I didn't see why it would be an effective scum gambit. I think people have since pointed out to me that maybe it would be an effective scum gambit, but somehow my suggestion that it wouldn't be makes me scum. *Shrug*