Mafia 121 -- Picking Simplicity Game Over

[UncertainKitten]

...Clearly I've joined the wrong game. We're on page 43 ALREADY!!!? :O

[Glork]

Vote: -Empking.

Would any of you mind if I talked like t)(is wit)( t)(e )(s for t)(e rest of t)(e game?

Glork: If you're town, do you think it was a good idea to go around telling everyone what a great idea it would be for scum to shoot Jack tonight?

I think that the scums are just as capable as anybody else at figuring out whether it's in their interests to shoot at Jack or not.

Not posting it doesn't mean that nobody else is thinking it. Don't even try this sort of non-logic with me.


That said, thank you for outing yourself as LMP's scumbuddy.

That's awesome. If you disagree with Glork you must be scum.

Nah, plenty of scums try to kiss my rear. Sometimes it works, too!


Also the question you should be asking yourself is, what has Nik done that *isn't* scummy? For super srs.

[Jack]

...Clearly I've joined the wrong game. We're on page 43 ALREADY!!!? :O

We lost a few pages when the board crashed.

[Empking]

@Empking: What is scummy about Nikanor's sillyness on page

4

3?

Its distractingly silly (do you mind if I use )( instead of "h") and why would town want to be distracting?

[Jack]

@Empking: What is scummy about Nikanor's sillyness on page

4

3?

Its distractingly silly (do you mind if I use )( instead of "h") and why would town want to be distracting?

What do you think about posts 75 and 77? :p

[Jack]

fos:nikanor

[Empking]

@Empking: What is scummy about Nikanor's sillyness on page

4

3?

Its distractingly silly (do you mind if I use )( instead of "h") and why would town want to be distracting?

What do you think about posts 75 and 77? :p

I'm not opposed to humour as I think it encourages proper activity. It the stupid non-sequitors that I dislike.

[LimMePls]

You think Nikanor doing )( instead of H makes Nikanor more likely to be scum, because it is a non-sequitor? Am I interpreting this right?

[Empking]

You think Nikanor doing )( instead of H makes Nikanor more likely to be scum, because it is a non-sequitor? Am I interpreting this right?

Yes to be quite honest.

[Azazel]

Azazel: how many games have you played here?

Enough. It's been a while though.

I can't believe how much idiocy I'm seeing demonstrated by some of the players. No, I'm not talking about the humor. Jack's claim was idiotic but not scummy. I think Glork has already pointed out why and I don't feel the need to spell it out again.

Vote: antihero

clearly someone isn't reading the game. I checked back and he's the only person who didn't comment in any way, shape, or form on the Jack situation so it's a good place to start.

I don't want him lynched but I think I need to see where this goes.

[LimMePls]

So is it still a non-sequitor given this earlier in the thread:

Wood evry1 b pissed if I typed liek this all game long?

Don't you think that inspired Nikanor's )( joke?

[Empking]

So is it still a non-sequitor given this earlier in the thread:

Wood evry1 b pissed if I typed liek this all game long?

Don't you think that inspired Nikanor's )( joke?

I'd say a response to a non-sequitor is essentially a non-sequitor in itself.

LMP: What are you trying to do with this discussion?

[AGar]

So is it still a non-sequitor given this earlier in the thread:

Wood evry1 b pissed if I typed liek this all game long?

Don't you think that inspired Nikanor's )( joke?

Why does it matter?

I like Empking already.

[LimMePls]

Well it matters if you call someone scummy for doing it but not someone else. Isn't this obvious?

[Antihero]

Vote: antihero

clearly someone isn't reading the game. I checked back and he's the only person who didn't comment in any way, shape, or form on the Jack situation so it's a good place to start.

I don't want him lynched but I think I need to see where this goes.

I had to make that random vote. In a previous game, Haylen gave me a post restriction where I could only post in barks. I needed revenge. And no, I didn't read the thread before I posted.

As for Jack, I'm with UK on that issue.

UNVOTE:

Glork: If you're town, do you think it was a good idea to go around telling everyone what a great idea it would be for scum to shoot Jack tonight?

Crap flinging much?

Post 57 = deflection fail

VOTE: Nikanor

What's up with this, Jack?
And why is LMP nitpicking at the most minor point in what makes Nik scummy?

[Antihero]

LOL! Quote tags.

Vote: antihero

clearly someone isn't reading the game. I checked back and he's the only person who didn't comment in any way, shape, or form on the Jack situation so it's a good place to start.

I don't want him lynched but I think I need to see where this goes.

I had to make that random vote. In a previous game, Haylen gave me a post restriction where I could only post in barks. I needed revenge. And no, I didn't read the thread before I posted.

As for Jack, I'm with UK on that issue.

UNVOTE:

Glork: If you're town, do you think it was a good idea to go around telling everyone what a great idea it would be for scum to shoot Jack tonight?

Crap flinging much?

Post 57 = deflection fail

VOTE: Nikanor

What's up with this, Jack?
And why is LMP nitpicking at the most minor point in what makes Nik scummy?[/quote]

[Jack]

Xine is scummy (response to both the above posts)

[SnakePlissken]

Jack is a lunatic. Not scummy however.

[Antihero]

Xine is scummy (response to both the above posts)

*looks at thread title*
*doesn't see "20 Questions Mafia"*

[UncertainKitten]

Nothing wrong with a little lunacy in mafia. It's gotten so textbook (and INCORRECTLY USED TEXTBOOK) that you NEED to be a little crazy to scumhunt.

LMP is getting dangerously close to creating a certain shape associated with 360 degrees with his argument ^-^. And that does no one any good .

[LimMePls]

Unvote
Vote: Antihero

This is better.

[Jack]

Xine is scummy (response to both the above posts)

*looks at thread title*
*doesn't see "20 Questions Mafia"*

You only asked me twice though, not 20 times. Typo I

guess

.

[Nikanor]

1. His non-direct attacks against Glork.
2. His silliness on page 4.
3. His ignoring of your own posts.

1. My question to Glork wasn't an attack at all. I was simply wondering what he was thinking. Is that such a crime?
2. Silliness ON PAGE FOUR is not a scumtell. I would agree that silliness on page ten is a scumtell, but not when the RVS is just ending.
3. Try explaining to me why you find LMP scummy, because I'm not seeing it.

Wow, by page 3. That's a new record.

If this were a question, I'm sure I'd be answering it in such a way that would have you taking the most pro-town course of action in response to my answer.

Antihero, how is that deflection at all? I don't recall attacking anyone in that post.

[Jack]

"Is that such a crime?"

:stare:

[Nikanor]