Mini 1100 - Hair Trigger Mafia (Over)

[Parama]

inb4 scumflip inb4 scumflip inb4 scumflip inb4 scumflip inb4 scumflip inb4 scumflip

[LlamaFluff]

quadz08

dodges the tackle of zang and closes in on

Jerbs

, a massive blast rocks the town square, and all that is left of the two is absolutely nothing.

Raiding their homes you fail to connect them to the invaders, or anything else for that matter.

quadz08 - Vanilla Suicide Bomber - Martyrer himself on Jerbs
Jerbs - Vanilla Suicide Bomber - Killed in a blast caused by quadz08

Currently Bombing - No One

Currently in Cooldown

Leo - December 19th, 2:26PM PST

Reinforcements will arrive February 14th, 11:20AM PST a countdown clock has been made available to you here

[Parama]

The hell.

[LlamaFluff]

Untrod Tripod has been prodded

Also given that it is the holiday season, please inform me of any V/LA that may prevent you from posting for over 48 hours.

[Narsis]

that doesnt mean a player shouldn't explain why they are doing what they are doing.

Well if you want, you can explain why you are active lurking and IIoA'ing. But I care more about your act of doing so than about your explanation, so you'll still be my #3.

I don't want people to be intimidated out of tackling just because they don't have a lot to say about it. Tackling means you doubt that either Jerbs or quadz is scum; it's as simple as that.

i'm not "active lurking" any more then you are.

and why would someone be intimidated out of tackling cause they don't have much to say? this is mafia...you better have something to say and a reason for doing what you are doing. sure tackling would mean you doubt they are scum, but that doesn't mean said person can't say why they dont think they are scum.

and ftr i hold the same stance on votes in a normal game. if you can't give a reason why you voted someone, then i wonder why you are voting them.

[Leo]

That is true, and adjusted. So I owe a scene which is happening now...

:disgruntled: at change, but rule 10 is rule 10

i'm not "active lurking" any more then you are.

you're joking, right? Do a self-ISO.

ISO 1: obvtackle, and "So, what should we do?"
ISO 2: "You made a typo, right?"
ISO 3: "How do we find scum?"
ISO 4: "I can't scumhunt without a RVS!!!"
ISO 5: IIoA
ISO 6: IIoA
ISO 7: Snark? Can't tell.
ISO 8: "I have qualms! but am not tackling."
ISO 9: "People should say why they're doing what they do."
ISO 10: Serious talk, but no suspects.

Do you believe Ant is scum or town?

[Untrod Tripod]

/picks up prod

will begin non-LA posting tonight

[AntB]

Have I gone invisible? One way to find out.

Bomb: Leo

This guy seems determined I'm scum and provided no information and has dodged my question on the matter.

Tick tock...

[Zang]

The hell.

This is what happens when you tell someone to bomb someone else without any reason. Jerbs did nothing scummy and if you thought it was so obvious that quadz was scum then you should have bombed him yourself.

[LlamaFluff]

AntB

finally gets up the courage and makes a bombing run at

Leo

He will reach him on Tuesday December 21st, 1:46PM PST

[Parama]

Tackle: AntB

no

Jerbs did plenty scummy.
quadz did plenty scummy.
You seem like you're scum trying to play the Cassandra card, Zang. If you thought Jerbs was town, you could've, y'know, told me WHY I was wrong instead of just sayin "lol ur rong nub".

[Zang]

Tackle: AntB

no

Jerbs did plenty scummy.
quadz did plenty scummy.
You seem like you're scum trying to play the Cassandra card, Zang. If you thought Jerbs was town, you could've, y'know, told me WHY I was wrong instead of just sayin "lol ur rong nub".

3 posts in the RVS and a V/LA notice are so scummy.

And I didn't think Jerbs was town, I just had no reason to suspect him as scum. I pretty much did explain it though when I asked why Jerbs was being bombed and you just said that you told him to do it.

[Parama]

See: this

u readin' bro?

[Zang]

>tackles person bombing Rich
>votes Rich

Looks like we're:
A. Not reading
B. Have double standards
C. Are Scum

D. Doesn't think Leo should randomly bomb someone.
E. Understands that voting does nothing.

And then Jerbs' next two posts are IIoA. Look at this awesome scumhunting:

So he's not scumhunting in the RVS.

How is saying something obvious scummy?

[Narsis]

That is true, and adjusted. So I owe a scene which is happening now...

:disgruntled: at change, but rule 10 is rule 10

i'm not "active lurking" any more then you are.

you're joking, right? Do a self-ISO.

ISO 1: obvtackle, and "So, what should we do?"
ISO 2: "You made a typo, right?"
ISO 3: "How do we find scum?"
ISO 4: "I can't scumhunt without a RVS!!!"
ISO 5: IIoA
ISO 6: IIoA
ISO 7: Snark? Can't tell.
ISO 8: "I have qualms! but am not tackling."
ISO 9: "People should say why they're doing what they do."
ISO 10: Serious talk, but no suspects.

Do you believe Ant is scum or town?

let's ISO you then why don't we:

1. "RANDOM BOMBING ATTACK!"
2. "That was a random bomb i did btw."
3. "Oh right these two people should bomb each other for no reason"
4. "You want a townie to bomb him??!?!!!/1!?1?1!?"
5. "I made a scum list which instantly makes me super town and totally awesome"
6. "Flavour speculation and obvious comments"
7. "Actions are more important then words!"
8. "I'm so awesomely cool town for saying that actions are important. Oh and people shouldn't be intimidated."
9. "I'm going to completely mis-rep you"

[Leo]

Have I gone invisible? One way to find out.

Bomb: Leo

This guy seems determined I'm scum and provided no information and has dodged my question on the matter.

Tick tock...

What question? Was this supposed to be a question:

I'm personally not liking Leo and

wondering why he has me as scum

, depite this being my 3rd post in the game.

?

Your first post was the worst post before 30 because the "double lynch" is the rational play, and your objection was useless, stanceless, and mildly resembled fearmongering. That's not a huge amount of evidence, but it was enough to put you in my page 2 top 2.
Your second post started with unimportant setup speculation but then you added the comment about me. You seemed to indicate a scum read on me, but in your previous post you had just used your tackle to save my life. Words that contradict your actions are the scummiest words. And it was OMGUS.
So that's why I had a scum read on you at the time you asked that question. Now, tell me why someone suspecting you makes them scum, since that seems to be your reason for attacking me.

Provided no information? In post 50 alone, I stated more reads on players than everyone else combined has. And stating who you think is scummy and who you think is town is the most important information. Most other words are just noise.

[Leo]

Really, Narsis? Did you actually reread your posts and analyze how they come off, like I asked?

My responses and interpretations are in olive:

let's ISO you then why don't we:

1. "RANDOM BOMBING ATTACK!"

-- Yes. It was the best way to start.

2. "That was a random bomb i did btw."

-- "There is information, you're just choosing to ignore it."

3. "Oh right these two people should bomb each other for no reason"

-- "These are my three top scumreads."

4. "You want a townie to bomb him??!?!!!/1!?1?1!?"

-- "If you want me bombed, why aren't you doing it? It looks like you want it to be a town-town bombing."

5. "I made a scum list which instantly makes me super town and totally awesome"

-- "These are my reads." Are you going to try to spin that as a scumtell??!?!!!/1!?1?1!?

6. "Flavour speculation and obvious comments"

-- Setup speculation (in response to various others) and an

important

correction of Nikanor's misstatement in post 68.

7. "Actions are more important then words!"

-- Yes.

8. "I'm so awesomely cool town for saying that actions are important. Oh and people shouldn't be intimidated."

-- Not what I said at all? And I stand by the idea that people should not have felt intimidated out of tackling quadz. Do their flips affect how you feel about this?

9. "I'm going to completely mis-rep you"

-- Vague accusation of a misrep, instead of pointing out anything I got wrong?

[AntB]

@Leo
Tackling is not saving you, its stopping you.
I explained my thoughts on the double lynch. It could be good but it could also be potentially flawed.
Stating you should bomb yourself was made as a joke, as should have been evident from the at the end, there is no implication of a scum read.
Why suddenly, should I bomb either zang or quadz without any reason or justification?
#50 nice list, my posts at this point are game analysis and a joke...
The question may have been too subtle, however it should have been enough to attract your attention if you were reading and not skimming.

You provided no information about why you had me high on your scum list. You seem to trying to twist and turn all in your favour.

@Everyone else
Only tackle me if you think we're both town... I know I'm town and I'm 99% on Leo being scum....
More set-up speculation here, but I don't believe a scum will attempt to bomb anyone... As there is fewer of them they can't afford to making bombing runs lightly. I would watch closely for who tackles and who flips what. In this case if Leo flips scum, watch Parama carefully.

[Jerbs]

Well... that was fun

Bah.

[Leo]

@Leo
Tackling is not saving you, its stopping you.

I don't believe a scum will attempt to bomb anyone...

You provided no information about why you had me high on your scum list.

We can agree that I didn't explain why I had a scum read on you at first. So what?

You seem to trying to twist and turn all in your favour.

Huh?

[Leo]

AntB

finally gets up the courage and makes a bombing run at

Leo

He will reach him on Tuesday December 21st, 1:46PM PST

@mod: could you verify the time and date listed here?

[AntB]

Logic, your on the attack. Its not you I'm saving.
Survival and numbers. Put it back in context.
If your going to paint someone as scum, give evidence. Simples.
You turned my bomb-yourself joke into me having a scum-read on you. Another point above, you took something out of context.

[Leo]

Logic, your on the attack. Its not you I'm saving.

In means English this what?

Survival and numbers. Put it back in context.

I understood what you were saying, and I agree with your statement:

I don't believe a scum will attempt to bomb anyone...

as a general principle

, which I think is how you meant it.
But it's self-serving for you to say this right after you attempt to bomb someone (it raises the possibility that you're trying to make yourself look town.)
And I'm apparently your biggest suspect despite being the only other player alive who has made a bombing attempt. Granted, I thought I was more likely than not going to be tackled, but there was some risk. So you're a hypocrite.

If your going to paint someone as scum, give evidence. Simples.

I was using no paint, just stating my opinions. You've been overreacting.

You turned my bomb-yourself joke into me having a scum-read on you. Another point above, you took something out of context.

It seemed like the logical interpretation. I don't care much about emoticons.

[RichardGHP]

LA until further notice

.

[LlamaFluff]

AntB

finally gets up the courage and makes a bombing run at

Leo

He will reach him on Tuesday December 21st, 1:46PM PST

@mod: could you verify the time and date listed here?

I have the post made at 1:46PM on the 19th, so the time is correct