StefanB wrote:Okay slight correction:
[whitout having a good reason than it will not go so strong/quote]
should have mean: I will pressure stronger.
Okay another correction: I didn't want to say that AP was sure scum or something yust that if Ghostlin means it he should pressure him.
AwesomePoe: I like it that you are more active stay that way.
Nikitakit: Be active. I know that it is very difficult to get reads on people, be patient we are just on page 3. The only think that you should be sure of know is that if one of us is scum, he didn't take the lurker rute.
Lets get to the lurkers: chkflip and hurristat haven't posted once. Hello guys!!!!!!!!!
And to get back to Ghostlin (sorry must get my thoughts in more order): You are not voting, why?
WIR (just the new points) just in the first point, get the he/she think in order, you are not making friends with that. Also post more.
The simplest answer is I don't vote until someone says something scummy or is active lurking. I was going to vote nikita, to be honest, but he actually posted; and something relevant to the conversation. Yes, I do vote active lurkers; the fact that they only post sporadically means they could be staying under the radar. The only reason why I like RVS is it's the staging ground for discussion like this, I've never been a fan of 'lol, I'm voting X because the sky's blue.' It rankles, this is a game of deduction, and while I'm sure you all are great folks, there's not much mafia playing done there until someone says something odd.
I am going to vote now. Right now I like the logic of WIR less and less; and it's been things like: he answers for Poe, he distorts at least two sentences for two different people as a particularly eager set of scum tells, and Deer's right, it almost seems like a thinly concealed OMGUS, which is bad. He's also not a horrifically prolific poster, when you read at least his last few comments, while they aren't lengthy, which is good, they don't tell us much of what's going on with his vote and who he suspects, which means he's playing it close to the vest. The longest post was kinda all over the place, and filled with bad logic. All of that right now makes WIR my favorite suspect.
Vote: WIR
Interestingly enough, I'm not a huge fan of Deer's posts either, although they have more content. While it wouldn't seem that Deer would scum buddy WIR, it would not be untoward scum play to stage an argument over something in order to distance one's self from the argument. Deer's a more prolific poster in volume of posts...I'm not sure what part of this total package makes me suspect Deer yet, it's a case that's started with someone I personally distrust in scum play that I'm working on a more developed case (or willing to drop) as time goes by.
IGMEOY: Deer
Stefan B: I've caught some distortions in your posts, but I'm not sure they're bad enough to be scummy. I'll probably watch it, and try to determine if the lack of understanding is intentional (you're trying to intentionally distort my intentions/what I say in my posts) or a difference in game play or language barrier. It's not as naked as WIR's deliberate distortion of: I've done something only once, so I get a free pass;
or
because you said you hate the RVS but say that actions that can be taken during it can be helpful to town, you're contradicting yourself, hence you are scummy.
FoS: Stefan B
"You live for the fight when it's all that you've got."--Bon Jovi, Living on a Prayer
