Mafia 125: Khan's Game of Mafia (Game Over)

Chevre · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:28 pm

To be fair, it was a difficult question to answer. I'll summarize how I feel right now without regarding the question.

nocase has claimed that he has a post-restriction. Of course, in a Normal game, I'm immediately suspicious, but I want him to explain his restriction as much as he can. More information and views are better, and the most vital view here is that of the person who claimed such an unbelievable thing.

nocase · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:31 pm

no, it was a perfectly straightforward question.

why aren't you voting anyone?

vote: chevre

, i guess.

Chevre · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:34 pm

You may believe your question was straightforward, and I attempted to answer it to the best of my ability.

I voted Xalxe in my first post, and have not unvoted.

nocase · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:40 pm

this is true. i must have conflated you with someone else.

unvote; vote: curiouskarmadog

with the caveat that i still think you're wahoo.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:45 pm

I HAVE A POST RESTRICTION TOO.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:46 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
SpyreX wrote:Yea and that little toss away doesn't do much.

This is one of those SERIOUS BUSINESS starts:

Either we see another PR claim and move from there or we call a dead man a dead man.
SpyreX I am so glad you are town.

Who are we lynching?

TOWN
SpyreX
DGB
inHim
nocase

Let's get to it.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:46 pm

I can feel the hate, Antihero. I can feel it.

Cyberbob · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:51 pm

inHimshallibe wrote:I HAVE A POST RESTRICTION TOO.

I don't suppose you can go into yours at all either?

inHimshallibe · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:52 pm

Cyberbob wrote:
inHimshallibe wrote:I HAVE A POST RESTRICTION TOO.
I don't suppose you can go into yours at all either?

:kicksrock:

There's a scum in the first page. I think it might be Seraphim.

nocase · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:54 pm

would scum so boldly admit that they're ignoring the restriction claim?

SpyreX · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:56 pm

SIGGHHH

Damnation inHim. Damnation.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:58 pm

But he didn't ignore it. He said he was just going to ignore it, but it looked like he wanted you to post more on it. He didn't look at the abilities like other people. (Add Antihero to the Town list, btw.)

vote: Seraphim

inHimshallibe · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:59 pm

SpyreX wrote:SIGGHHH

Damnation inHim. Damnation.

MY RESTRICTION: I ONLY SPIT DA TROOF.

SpyreX · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:08 pm

How the hell is it listed? Its not an 'ability' at all?

nocase · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:09 pm

this is cute.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:16 pm

SpyreX wrote:How the hell is it listed? Its not an 'ability' at all?

Walk me through this one.

Gorrad · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:28 pm

Vote: Dutch One

So KK doesn't need to find a replacement D1.

DGB, I want you to claim. I don't care if it's real or fake, your claims are fantastic and often game-changing, and I don't want you to be NK'd before you have the chance to turn this game on its head.

Cyberbob · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:36 pm

Gorrad wrote:DGB, I want you to claim. I don't care if it's real or fake, your claims are fantastic and often game-changing, and I don't want you to be NK'd before you have the chance to turn this game on its head.

Gut twinge here.

Korlash · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:38 pm

Chevre wrote:nocase has claimed that he has a post-restriction. Of course, in a Normal game, I'm immediately suspicious, but I want him to explain his restriction as much as he can. More information and views are better, and the most vital view here is that of the person who claimed such an unbelievable thing.

I may have been in my coma-nap for a while so the term "normal" game doesn't seem to mean to me what it should, but why would you be suspicious of... anything, when KK posted like an [exagerated] number of possible, likely, and/or simply for aesthetic design roles on page one. Would you be any more suspicious if he had claimed to be a paranoid gun owner? Or an unlynchable? Or a professional dog walker? Seriously, what the hell is that? That's not a profession... go get a job hippie...

nocase · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:40 pm

Cyberbob wrote:
Gorrad wrote:DGB, I want you to claim. I don't care if it's real or fake, your claims are fantastic and often game-changing, and I don't want you to be NK'd before you have the chance to turn this game on its head.
Gut twinge here.

ME TOO!

wanna start a wagon with me?

Kublai Khan · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:41 pm

Deadline added to OP (5 weeks).

Also, Xalxe PMed me that he will be V/LA until 1/23 (Sunday).

inHimshallibe · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:41 pm

Cyberbob wrote:
Gorrad wrote:DGB, I want you to claim. I don't care if it's real or fake, your claims are fantastic and often game-changing, and I don't want you to be NK'd before you have the chance to turn this game on its head.
Gut twinge here.

Welcome to the fold, 'bob.

DGB
SpyreX
nocase
inHim
Cyberbob
Antihero

Let's kill someone.

nocase · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:49 pm

unvote. vote: gorrad.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:50 pm

unvote
vote: gorrad

Antihero · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:51 pm

Korlash wrote:
Chevre wrote:nocase has claimed that he has a post-restriction. Of course, in a Normal game, I'm immediately suspicious, but I want him to explain his restriction as much as he can. More information and views are better, and the most vital view here is that of the person who claimed such an unbelievable thing.
I may have been in my coma-nap for a while so the term "normal" game doesn't seem to mean to me what it should, but why would you be suspicious of... anything, when KK posted like an [exagerated] number of possible, likely, and/or simply for aesthetic design roles on page one. Would you be any more suspicious if he had claimed to be a paranoid gun owner? Or an unlynchable? Or a professional dog walker? Seriously, what the hell is that? That's not a profession... go get a job hippie...

It's fun to watch scum fail.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Korlash