If I believe that there is somebody who has more of a reason to be lynched than the one who I am currently voting for, why shouldn't I change my vote?Llamarble wrote:"I didn't need much of a reason to change votes" = "I don't care who we lynch as long as it's not me or my buddies."
Mini 1122: Mafia.Exe Game Over
-
-
bgg1996 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 449
- Joined: June 20, 2009
- Location: Look behind you.
People both love and hate me... Without the 'love' part.-
-
Llamarble Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3582
- Joined: May 2, 2010
-
-
GreyICE Fifty Shades
- Fifty Shades
- Fifty Shades
- Posts: 15455
- Joined: December 15, 2010
Sure. It put her at L-2 with no reasoning, no reason for voting, and no real logic behind it. Like "oh, everyone is voting for Xine, let me do that too." Oh and then he wins like a thousand other prizes too immediately after that.Nathanael wrote:Grey, would you mind explainingwhythat vote was "really, really bad"?
Don't you stand behind your scumread on Xine anymore?ShowThat which is done out of love always takes place beyond good and evil
Official Visigoth
Read Mother Jones-
-
Redacted Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 100
- Joined: January 30, 2011
What is this I don't even..DeathRowKitty wrote:
He was wayyyyyy overaggressive for the RVS.Xine wrote:Actually it does, I see him(?) as the most obv town player so far. so, please, do explain.
The game is mafia not happy happy funtimes, not sure what this expectation you have about RVS is but none of my votes are random and I find the whole idea of a phase devoted to useless noise to be antitown.
What the bloody hell is this nonsense, your here posting on a daily basis but your not going to answer questions until the 14th? Either bugger off for your V/LA or play the game, waiting to see how the game develops before answering questions seems a game plan that consists of combines the worst of coasting and active lurking.DeathRowKitty wrote:
Hello, I'm DRK and I'm on LA until the 14th. Nice to meet you too.Xine wrote:DRK, we are all still waiting on your explanation...
The first half of this post is fantastic, you see someone immedatly go for the obvious vote without even bothering to rationalize it, questioning them is 100% appropriate; but the second half is completely awful and comes off as scummy. It completely contradicts the first half, he saw a bad vote and attacked it, trying to work in his scum read on Xine into the situation is opportunistic as hell.Nathanael wrote:
Grey, would you mind explainingGreyICE wrote:Unvote
Vote: bgg
Bad vote was really, really bad.whythat vote was "really, really bad"?
Don't you stand behind your scumread on Xine anymore?The user formerly known as [Redacted].-
-
Redacted Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 100
- Joined: January 30, 2011
On another note I remain completely happy with my vote on Neruz.
He's gone from denying anything of importance has happened to;
And since then hasn't attacked anyone else, if he's so sure of his vote on Xine that he's not even bothering to hunt around for the rest of the day (He's only been discussing mafia theory and making throw away remarks since then), why does he explicitly distance himself from the Xine wagon (He makes sure to include "on your behalf" and to explain he's joining the wagon to "make it up to you").Neruz wrote:I apologise for not making sense, to make it up to you i will join the wagon and vote Xine on your behalf.
VOTE: XineThe user formerly known as [Redacted].-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
There are 2 bold claims in your first sentence, both of which are blatantly false. If you're confident enough in them to accuse me of them in that tone but not useful enough to actually check if they're correct (especially since checking one of them would have required no more than fully reading the post you were quoting), I plan on ignoring everything you say for the rest of the game. Stop PMSing and actually play.[Redacted] wrote:What the bloody hell is this nonsense, your here posting on a daily basis but your not going to answer questions until the 14th? Either bugger off for your V/LA or play the game, waiting to see how the game develops before answering questions seems a game plan that consists of combines the worst of coasting and active lurking.Last edited by Exe on Sun Feb 13, 2011 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrog
-
-
Neruz Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: May 19, 2010
I find it incredibly amusing that you accuse me of making throw away remarks since that vote, when you quote one of those throw away remarks and take it seriously.
I voted Xine because i didn't like his early sweeping declaration, as you would have noticed if you'd read and quoted the entire post instead of only the part that you felt like reading. I havn't said much of content so far because there hasn't been much to say. Hiraki and Nathanael appear to be having a little slap fight, bgg pulled an early claim that is either painfully newbie town or very clever scum. Llmarble makes a good point about the early L-2 Vote, but i'm getting more of a town vibe from bgg.
Xine, on the other hand, has gone intomassivelurk mode, posting only twice in the last two pages and providing no content at all in any of her posts. Her last post, in fact, consisted of asking other players their experience. She has consistantly failed to respond at all to all the people voting her and appears to just be hiding and fervently hoping that if she ignores it hard enough, it will all go away.
Based on that and what i'm seeing from the rest of the players so far, i see no reason to move my vote. In most cases any questions or pokes i would have done, someone else got there before me, which is just par for being in Australia and thus out of synch with the rest of the western world timezone-wise.
Nice attempt at manufacturing a case on me though, i'll give you a point for trying.-
-
Neruz Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: May 19, 2010
-
-
Xine Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 295
- Joined: June 21, 2010
- Location: Portland Or
Heh, I lurk, tis true, always have. (I'm a very busy woman, but I manage to keep up on reading, and posting requirements, feel confident in that) I do like that you excuse yourself for lack of content, and then immediately attack me for lack of content... awesome. as far as not commenting on my wagon, that's cause I'm not worried about it, 1) I'm not afraid to die 2) it gives ma a great point of view for early wagon analysis.
I'm even more sure about GreyICE being scum, as sure about DRK, and less sure on bgg, no new scum-spects.It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain
avatar art by DrippingGoofball-
-
Neruz Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: May 19, 2010
I have more content than you Xine, in fact i think that's the first post from you that has any content or relevance to the game so far.
You're thinking about it wrong. I don't give a wooden nickle if you're afraid to die or not, iXine wrote:1) I'm not afraid to diedocare if you're afraid that the town will do somethin suboptimal. Lynching a town player isbad, it is to be avoided, because the town does not win by lynching the town.
Are you playing to win Xine? Because if you are, you're playing for a scum win.-
-
Xine Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 295
- Joined: June 21, 2010
- Location: Portland Or
I guess that's a matter of opinion. a long day one is surly optimal for town. but I do like the way you think, hey everyone, let's go with Neruz's plan and lynch scum!It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain
avatar art by DrippingGoofball-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
You see that thing below where you type up posts that says "Display posts by user:" with a dropdown menu? Select your name and click "Go". That's your iso. At the time of my posting about it, your iso contained (IIRC) 5 posts, 4 of which contained votes, and very scarce content to justify 3 quick vote switches.Nathanael wrote:Since you seem to agree with Grey's point, but I can't understand it (what is that "ISO"-stuff you are talking about?), how about you explain it to me in your words. what exactly was Grey's point?
GreyICE, I'd like you to NOT answer this question for him, since I want to know what DRK agrees with exactly.
Yeahhhhh, I'm definitely liking the idea of a Nathanael wagon here. I don't see any town motivation here.Nathanael wrote:Hey Hiraki. I'm Nathanael. I'm fine and I am happy to meet you in this cool game. I hope you are well too.
I think it would improve the relationship between us a lot if we just were honest to each other so I'll ask you a little question: Are you scum?
I'd appreciate your sincerity.
QFT....especially the facepalmMME wrote:
/facepalmbgg1996 wrote:Also, if I'm not mistaken, this will be the first time I've actually played as a vanilla townie. (In my more inexperienced games, all of the roles had an ability)
Good luck using meta on me.
I'm not able to meta you right now (at friends on mafiascum (yeah, I know...)), but I'm inclined to believe this statement, lol.
His explanation for his vote is OMGUS + changes votes easily. Not sure how that could possibly convince you of anything.Greedling wrote:
I can support this. I was suspecting you tell now as just bullrushing Xine lynch, but this makes sense. unvote vote Xinebgg1996 wrote:
Around the middle-end of 2009 I played a few games on a rather inexperienced site. A bit after that I played a newbie game on this site as a... Roleblocker? It was a mafia role, I remember. I was about to lose, but I won because the time ran out.Ant_to_the_max wrote: bgg1996 what is your experience playing Mafia?
The reason I voted Xine? There isn't much of one. I mainly voted him because he said I was mafia. I am a good guy. I didn't need much of a reason to change votes. I voted My Milked Eek originally for almost no reason at all. A random vote, I thought was best at the time.
Also, yes. I get rather defensive. I always do.FoS Greedling
Okay, now I'm not so sure he's town. Ignore my earlier agreement with MME. (inb4 bgg-Greedling-Nathanael scum team?)bgg1996 wrote:Does this mafia even have roles other than regular townies and mafia members?
Just to clarify: are you saying I'm scum for having voted [Redacted]? If so, why is that scummy?Xine wrote:I'm even more sure about GreyICE being scum, as sure about DRK, and less sure on bgg, no new scum-spects.-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
-
-
Xine Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 295
- Joined: June 21, 2010
- Location: Portland Or
I'm really tired, but didn't he say this was his first game playing as a vanilla, and then claim that he didn't know if anything other then vanilla exists, DRK, I'll get back to you soon, I'm being rude to guestsby posting right nowIt ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain
avatar art by DrippingGoofball-
-
Neruz Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: May 19, 2010
-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
-
-
Neruz Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: May 19, 2010
I'm getting a pretty strong town vibe from bgg. I don't really see any indication that what we see on the surface (a somewhat confused newbie) isn't what is actually there.
Barring him suddenly coming up with an elaborate ruse or plan or revealing deep and complex reasoning behind his actions, i'd say he's safe to dismiss as 'probably town' for now. We have plenty of free lynches yet if someone decides that he just must be an incredibly cunning scum running an elaborate scam.-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
-
-
Neruz Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: May 19, 2010
Lots of vote-hoppy, a couple of pertinent questions and a bit of nonsense.
I'm not getting a particulary strong scum vibe off the measly 6 posts he has made, the vote hoppy could indicate someone amusing themselves with the RVS, or it could indicate a scum looking for a wagon that sticks. The lurking could indicate a townie somewhat out of his depth or a scum hoping to avoid notice now that the Xine wagon has been located.
Reasonable chance of being scum, probably worth poking a bit, although Hiraki's attempts so far have met with consummate failure.-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
Well let's look at Nathanael's votes:
The case on [Redacted] was a joke vote, so it's safe to assume this is purely a random vote.Nathanael, Vote 1 wrote:VOTE: [Redacted]
I agree with the case on him.
Looking like a not-so-random vote.Nathanael, Vote 2 wrote:
UNVOTE: VOTE: GreyICE, for no-lynching.GreyICE wrote: What can I say, I'm lucky that way. Oh well.
Vote: No Lynch
Lets be friends!
This came 5 posts after his vote on GreyICE and is once again random. The only thing that changed between those two posts is that Greedling's new GreyICE vote became a matter of contention (2 votes for Greedling, 1 vote for someone for voting for Greedling). Either his vote on Hiraki was meaningless (in which case why bother casting it?) or I could possibly see nervous scum moving away from controversy.Nathanael, Vote 3 wrote:UNVOTE: VOTE: DeathRowKitty, for fucking with my brain. (What does "Ribbit" mean? or did I just get something wrong?)
Oh, look, a serious wagon that I'm going to arbitrarily hop onto while distracting you by talking about other stuff!Nathanael, Vote 4 wrote:UNVOTE: VOTE: Xine. wagon go go go!
PS: deathrowkitty, could you please explain what "Ribbit" means?
Nothing pokes quite like a vote! So how 'bout it? Nathanael wagon?Neruz wrote:Reasonable chance of being scum, probably worth poking a bit, although Hiraki's attempts so far have met with consummate failure.-
-
Xine Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 295
- Joined: June 21, 2010
- Location: Portland Or
these could easily be newb scum move too.Neruz wrote:I'm getting a pretty strong town vibe from bgg. I don't really see any indication that what we see on the surface (a somewhat confused newbie) isn't what is actually there.
Barring him suddenly coming up with an elaborate ruse or plan or revealing deep and complex reasoning behind his actions, i'd say he's safe to dismiss as 'probably town' for now. We have plenty of free lynches yet if someone decides that he just must be an incredibly cunning scum running an elaborate scam.
he put me at L-2 with no comment, then defended himself with the most blatant OMGUS I've ever seen, I think I'm gonna...
UNVOTE: VOTE: bggIt ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain
avatar art by DrippingGoofball-
-
Nathanael Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 255
- Joined: October 2, 2010
- Location: 2 Minutes to Midnight
I think voting no-lynch in RVS is aHiraki wrote:1) Why should I not believe that NL vote was not scum-driven?slightlyscummy move. why? because assume everybody would do it. what would happen? apart from ending the day without lynching, even if the day did in fact go on, we would get absolutely no information from any vote and would never get out of RVS.
I had seen DRK's brainfuck program a while ago (while reading some other thread I think) and had (since I hadn't anything to do at that moment) tried to find out what it does. I saw that it spelled out "Ribbit" and was a little perplexed. then I forgot about it.2) Why did you continue RVS with the DRK vote?
I didn't notice his sig at first, but then thought RVS would be a good opportunity to ask him about his brainfuck-thing.
What did you want me to say exactly? "Nooooo, please don't vote me!!!" or something like that?3) Why did you ignore my vote?
so we lynch you tomorrow?
Only on Tuesdays!Nathanael wrote:Are you scum?
fair enough.GreyICE wrote:
Sure. It put her at L-2 with no reasoning, no reason for voting, and no real logic behind it. Like "oh, everyone is voting for Xine, let me do that too." Oh and then he wins like a thousand other prizes too immediately after that.Nathanael wrote:Grey, would you mind explainingwhythat vote was "really, really bad"?
Don't you stand behind your scumread on Xine anymore?
do you still think Xine is scum? if yes, do/did you think bgg was bussing?
did your opinion about bgg change after post 89 and 91?
how serious is this post?DeathRowKitty wrote:
Yeahhhhh, I'm definitely liking the idea of a Nathanael wagon here. I don't see any town motivation here.Nathanael wrote:Hey Hiraki. I'm Nathanael. I'm fine and I am happy to meet you in this cool game. I hope you are well too.
I think it would improve the relationship between us a lot if we just were honest to each other so I'll ask you a little question: Are you scum?
I'd appreciate your sincerity.
I assume you mean GreyICE instead of Hiraki. As I explained above, my vote on GreyICE had some reason, and I explained above why I voted you. I see your attack on this point and I think voting you was slightly anti-town as I regressed one step. I was just so confused by your BF-sig. My position on voting no-lynch is clear, no need to "avoid controversy" thereDeathRowKitty wrote:
This came 5 posts after his vote on GreyICE and is once again random. The only thing that changed between those two posts is that Greedling's new GreyICE vote became a matter of contention (2 votes for Greedling, 1 vote for someone for voting for Greedling). Either his vote on Hiraki was meaningless (in which case why bother casting it?) or I could possibly see nervous scum moving away from controversy.Nathanael, Vote 3 wrote:UNVOTE: VOTE: DeathRowKitty, for fucking with my brain. (What does "Ribbit" mean? or did I just get something wrong?)
Xine is very probably scum. so I vote him. what's your problem?
Oh, look, a serious wagon that I'm going to arbitrarily hop onto while distracting you by talking about other stuff!Nathanael, Vote 4 wrote:UNVOTE: VOTE: Xine. wagon go go go!
PS: deathrowkitty, could you please explain what "Ribbit" means?
CONFIRM VOTE: Xine.Xine wrote:
these could easily be newb scum move too.Neruz wrote:I'm getting a pretty strong town vibe from bgg. I don't really see any indication that what we see on the surface (a somewhat confused newbie) isn't what is actually there.
Barring him suddenly coming up with an elaborate ruse or plan or revealing deep and complex reasoning behind his actions, i'd say he's safe to dismiss as 'probably town' for now. We have plenty of free lynches yet if someone decides that he just must be an incredibly cunning scum running an elaborate scam.
he put me at L-2 with no comment, then defended himself with the most blatant OMGUS I've ever seen, I think I'm gonna...
UNVOTE: VOTE: bgg-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
-
-
GreyICE Fifty Shades
- Fifty Shades
- Fifty Shades
- Posts: 15455
- Joined: December 15, 2010
I don't think bgg fully thought his actions through. I think he wanted to be on a wagon like everyone else and just jumped on. Frankly, I don't think it matters if it was a town wagon or a scum wagon, he seems desperately worried about fitting in. Desperately, desperately worried. That doesn't scream town to me.
#91 is terrible. You know why it's frequently in the town's best interest to lynch claimed vanilla townies, especially on day 1, and to hard claim that way under what can only be described as 'pressure voting' is a complete panic attack. I wanted an explanation for the vote, I cannot believe that the explanation was to CLAIM VANILLA TOWNIE before L-2 or L-1. It's friggin unbelievably bad, and says 'newbie scum panic' more than it says 'believably town' to me.
The only things you should claim early is miller (always) and sometimes Paranoid Gun Owner (I guess, wouldn't mind some opinions on that one).ShowThat which is done out of love always takes place beyond good and evil
Official Visigoth
Read Mother Jones
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.