Open 291 Frenenemies (+ other guy) - Game over: Wolves win!

parknourie · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:45 pm

Vote: Krazy

There can be only ONE.

wizrak · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:44 pm

VOTE: VOTE: Krazy

I dont like ur avatar, its disgusting

aaah400 · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:48 pm

Glass wrote:VOTE: ahhh for being in 1000 games.

vote glass

yes although im in a few games but not 1000 at the same time, or ill die :/ and im in neither of your games :/

parknourie · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:55 pm

Can't you see the figurative language used there?

Krazy · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:04 pm

K > C

parknourie · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:07 pm

Krazy wrote:K > C

True. I would prefer fake Crazy than real Crazy. Get it?

Unvote

Vote: Crazy

There can be only ONE.

Quaroath · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:20 pm

VOTE: TheBigLebowski because white russians are the devils tool!

ThAdmiral · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:23 pm

vote count

Crazy - 2 (Krazy, parknourie)
Jerbs - 1 (Crazy)
Krazy - 2 (Jerbs, wizrak)
Quaroath
wizrak
Glass - 1 (aaah400)
smashbro_of_the_SSS
parknourie
TheBigLebowski - 1 (Quaroath)
chkflip
aaah400 - 1 (Glass)

smashbro_of_the_SSS · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:33 am

vote: wizrak

i meant, didn't get the whole thing bold

Glass · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:23 am

aaah400 wrote:
Glass wrote:VOTE: ahhh for being in 1000 games.

vote glass
yes although im in a few games but not 1000 at the same time, or ill die :/ and im in neither of your games :/

Yes you are, you are in this game

Quaroath · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:38 am

Glass wrote:
aaah400 wrote:
Glass wrote:VOTE: ahhh for being in 1000 games.

vote glass
yes although im in a few games but not 1000 at the same time, or ill die :/ and im in neither of your games :/
Yes you are, you are in this game

Liar, Lynch him!

Jerbs · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:11 am

unvote
Vote: Crazy

ALL ABOARD!!!!

Crazy · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:54 am

parknourie wrote:
Krazy wrote:K > C
True. I would prefer fake Crazy than real Crazy. Get it?

Unvote

Vote: Crazy

There can be only ONE.

I was Crazy first, srsly.

Krazy · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:12 pm

CAN'T STOP THE TRAIN

CHOO CHOO

Glass · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:30 pm

krazy wrote:K > C

Not true, watch this:
C = 5, K = 3
C > K
Q.E.D.

VOTE: Krazy

Quaroath · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:49 pm

Krazy wrote:CAN'T STOP THE TRAIN

CHOO CHOO

Krazy is kooky crazy, but Crazy is just crazy insane.

Come on ride the train, it's a choo choo train!

Glass · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:05 pm

quaroath wrote: Come on ride the train, it's a choo choo train!That is an odd thing to say considering that you are not on the crazy wagon yourself.

Odd thing to say considering that you are not voting krazy yourself.

TheBigLebowski · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:25 pm

Quaroath wrote:VOTE: TheBigLebowski because white russians are the devils tool!

Oh My God U Suck
VOTE: Quaroath
For hating on white russians.

chkflip · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:47 pm

As opposed to what, exactly? Black Russians?

VOTE: TheBigLebowski

Now, which comment is more odd - Quaroath's choo-choo comment without him actually being on the wagon

or

the fact that Glass felt it necessary to point out the obvious? Neither. They're both dismissable.

Jerbs' OMGUS through an RVS filter is something to note, though.

Quaroath · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:50 pm

Glass wrote:
quaroath wrote: Come on ride the train, it's a choo choo train!That is an odd thing to say considering that you are not on the crazy wagon yourself.
Odd thing to say considering that you are not voting krazy yourself.

The choo choo bit made me think of Quad City DJ's "C'mon ride the train". Mostly where that came from. I find it amusing and confusing to have a crazy and a krazy.

Crazy · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:18 pm

chkflip wrote:Jerbs' OMGUS through an RVS filter is something to note, though.

Why? And what does "something to note" mean? Scummy? Slightly scummy? Neutral, but interesting?

Crazy · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:27 pm

chkflip wrote:Now, which comment is more odd - Quaroath's choo-choo comment without him actually being on the wagon or the fact that Glass felt it necessary to point out the obvious? Neither. They're both dismissable.

Saying something's dismissable doesn't do anything except kill a possible discussion point. Why'd you feel the need to point that out?

aaah400 · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:15 pm

Crazy > Krazy.

07,05,2008 > 29.01.11

Krazy · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:53 am

Not getting that much out of this RVS so far, so let's do some RQS.

-How screwed is the town?

-Which are cooler, werewolves or mafia?

-How lurkerish are YOU?

-Rate the following on a scale of Very Scummy to very Noobish to Totally Pro:

-Asking questions about role mechanics (Is this always role fishing?)
-Talking about No Lynch
-Talking about theory in the first few pages

And the most important question:
-Why haven't you voted Crazy yet?

chkflip · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:12 am

Crazy wrote:
chkflip wrote:Jerbs' OMGUS through an RVS filter is something to note, though.
Why? And what does "something to note" mean? Scummy? Slightly scummy? Neutral, but interesting?

It means that, as of now, it's worth keeping on the brain. It's relatively worthless all by itself, but as the game continues? It has the possibility to manifest itself (with other things) to formulate into something.

Crazy wrote:
chkflip wrote:Now, which comment is more odd - Quaroath's choo-choo comment without him actually being on the wagon or the fact that Glass felt it necessary to point out the obvious? Neither. They're both dismissable.
Saying something's dismissable doesn't do anything except kill a possible discussion point. Why'd you feel the need to point that out?

It could only kill the discussion if everyone has the same opinion I do... which I highly doubt. I felt the need to point it out because, to me, at that current moment, it's not worth much; NOW, however, it strikes me that Quar still felt the need to elaborate.

Krazy wrote: 1 How screwed is the town?

2 Which are cooler, werewolves or mafia?

3 How lurkerish are YOU?

-Rate the following on a scale of Very Scummy to very Noobish to Totally Pro:

4 Asking questions about role mechanics (Is this always role fishing?)
5 Talking about No Lynch
6 Talking about theory in the first few pages

And the most important question:
7 Why haven't you voted Crazy yet?

1] I don't think town's all that "screwed," imo. It's only four scum in two groups of two. They're more probable, in my experience, to hurt themselves more than they hurt the town - if only because of crosskills.

2] I just got into this show of SyFy called "Being Human" with a werewolf, a vampire, and a ghost all living together. Wolves seem much cooler than Mafiosos, but only because I haven't had my Scarface fix in a while.

3] Not very, but I can tend to if I feel like I'm replying too often. (I get a little anxious sometimes)

4] Depends on the question, this could be quite the ambiguous statement. If it's something specifically about the ww's maulings alongside mafia NKs, then it might be fishing? But if it's something simple like pointing out that post 0 says 4 townies but post 2 says 5 townies recieved, then that just might be somebody that's not paying enough attention. (I almost pointed this out to the mod before realizing my mistake, lol)

5] It's been scummy everytime I saw it. NLs have very little gain, imo.

6] I enjoy discussion and rather hate RVS, so it's pro to me.

7] He's seemed pretty pro-town to me so far.