Bloodbath in Camden - Game Over!
-
-
Hiraki
-
-
KingTwelveSixteen Goon
-
-
Slaxx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: January 1, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
-
-
Slaxx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: January 1, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
I'm calling this BS.Toogeloo wrote:I like advocating any lynch that isn't mine on the first page, but the votes on King are highly misreped considering all he asked for was reasons for votes that were on me. He at least gave one, everyone else who voted me didn't even say hello, just plopped down a vote. I can agree that reasoning, no matter how shitty and weak, should still be given in a vote, otherwise it just looks opportunistic at best.
Giving a joking reason to vote you and just randomly voting you are the same thing, to me at least, because neither offers any legitimate content besides a vote. Such is RVS. And you are missing the point and addressing the wrong issue in this post. We are not voting him because he gave a reason for his vote on you, we are voting him because he scrutinized random votes, which after all, are random and should not fall under any scrutiny.-
-
Toogeloo Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8437
- Joined: October 21, 2009
- Location: Jusenkyo
No, he asked where reasons were instead of just posting a vote. If he really had a problem with the votes on me, he would have unvoted himself. Read his post, it simply asks for reasons behind votes, which is something that should be expected from everyone.Slaxx wrote:
I'm calling this BS.Toogeloo wrote:I like advocating any lynch that isn't mine on the first page, but the votes on King are highly misreped considering all he asked for was reasons for votes that were on me. He at least gave one, everyone else who voted me didn't even say hello, just plopped down a vote. I can agree that reasoning, no matter how shitty and weak, should still be given in a vote, otherwise it just looks opportunistic at best.
Giving a joking reason to vote you and just randomly voting you are the same thing, to me at least, because neither offers any legitimate content besides a vote. Such is RVS. And you are missing the point and addressing the wrong issue in this post. We are not voting him because he gave a reason for his vote on you, we are voting him because he scrutinized random votes, which after all, are random and should not fall under any scrutiny.-
-
KingTwelveSixteen Goon
-
-
Slaxx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: January 1, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
-
-
Slaxx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: January 1, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
-
-
CooLDoG Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
I actually think slaxx is the strongest town read. and + points for having what appears to be a Matt Daemon (spelling?) avatar...
Damn holy fuck, what happened on page 1?
King screams scum it with his omgus vote and earlier posts, and toogelo defends him? What the fuck is wrong with scum players these days, are they incapable of knowing how to play?
@toog, why did you defend king?
@king, why do you need reasons for a random vote? honestly?after a wank.-
-
KingTwelveSixteen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: November 25, 2010
- Location: Lawrenceville Goargia
1. I didn't actually ask for reasons, I just mentioned that it was annoying that nobody gave any.CooLDoG wrote:...
@king, why do you need reasons for a random vote? honestly?
2. Reasons are needed to do anything in this game. We will never get out of RVS if people are allowed to just make empty posts with nothing but votes.
3. It wasn't a single vote, it was three votes in a row.
Also, why are you assuming that me and Tag are scum andwhatmakes you think that? Other than how you think it is fine for people to post nothing but votes during RVS I see nothing saying that either of us are scummy.
Oh yeah, "scrutiny of votes is bad" is the reason you gave. And then you say my vote on Exe is scummy because it is OMGUS, without saying why the reason given is irrelevent, something I believe is required in order for a vote to be OMGUS.
Because Empking has done nothing to make him seem at all like a townie.Slaxx wrote:
Pretty vague for the guy who is pushing for reasons for voting.KingTwelveSixteen wrote:
You are insane.Slaxx wrote:And so the fluffy rhetoric begins.
Lets create a bit of controversy. Strongest town read right now is Empking. Opinions?
How so?ShowWin-Loss Ratio
2-3 Town
1-0 Scum
0-0 Third Party
3-3 overall-
-
Toogeloo Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8437
- Joined: October 21, 2009
- Location: Jusenkyo
People attacked him for being afraid of the wagon on me (despite him being one of the votes) which is a misrepresentation of what his post stated. If people are going to call him scum, it wasn't because of him being afraid of votes.CooLDoG wrote:@toog, why did you defend king?
I have a null read on King, like pretty much most everyone, I do not like misrepresentations of people's posts though. Anyone who claims that King was afraid of votes has no clue what they are reading.-
-
CooLDoG Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: A grand nominal wizard from the peripheral
Conclusions from the last 2 posts:
1) if king is scum toogy is too.
2)King doesn't know the meaning of rvs.
@king, what reasons would you consider to be valid for an rvs vote? Are those reasons really that meaningful? And are they more meaningful then not giving reasons at all?
Don't you also think that you are taking what I said to absurd extremes? Remember I gave a clarification stating that there is no pointthisearly in the game. And also are my reasons for voting you any less legitimate (possibly more) then any other reasons in rvs?after a wank.-
-
KingTwelveSixteen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: November 25, 2010
- Location: Lawrenceville Goargia
So you are saying that your statement of "King screams scum it with his omgus vote and earlier posts, and toogelo defends him? What the fuck is wrong with scum players these days, are they incapable of knowing how to play?" was part of an RVS vote? It clearly was not.CooLDoG wrote:Conclusions from the last 2 posts:
1) if king is scum toogy is too.
2)King doesn't know the meaning of rvs.
@king, what reasons would you consider to be valid for an rvs vote? Are those reasons really that meaningful? And are they more meaningful then not giving reasons at all?
Don't you also think that you are taking what I said to absurd extremes? Remember I gave a clarification stating that there is no pointthisearly in the game.And also are my reasons for voting you any less legitimate (possibly more) then any other reasons in rvs?
Any reason that is obviously random would be a valid RVS vote, and we would get at least a bit of information out of it. Giving no reasons gives absolutely no information, not even any help in determining if somebody is voting for actually thinking somebody is scum or just for RVS.
Absurd extremes? What did I take to any extreme?
Unvote
Vote: CooLDoGShowWin-Loss Ratio
2-3 Town
1-0 Scum
0-0 Third Party
3-3 overall-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
KingTwelveSixteen wrote:...What, not even a horrible reason included with those votes there?
OH EMM GEEE.KingTwelveSixteen wrote:I'm scared of votes on another player?
U SUCKKKKKKKKK
NOTING THE SUSPICION AND NOT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT WILL NOT MAKE IT MAGICALLY DISAPPEAR.KingTwelveSixteen wrote:So, apparently it is bad to ask people to post something other than a vote now. >_>
Oh yeah.KingTwelveSixteen wrote:I assume you are talking about me with that baseless, evidenceless, argumentless accusation there?
It was baseless.-
-
KingTwelveSixteen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: November 25, 2010
- Location: Lawrenceville Goargia
You still havn't given a base for it, or an argument, or evidence. You only gave a fancy picture and an insult.Hiraki wrote:...
Oh yeah.KingTwelveSixteen wrote:I assume you are talking about me with that baseless, evidenceless, argumentless accusation there?
It was baseless.ShowWin-Loss Ratio
2-3 Town
1-0 Scum
0-0 Third Party
3-3 overall-
-
Slaxx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: January 1, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
Slaxx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: January 1, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
1000 for the picture+6=1,006.Hiraki wrote:
What do you think about my reasoning?Slaxx wrote:Toogeloo I find it funny you are shooting down other reasons for FoSs but not pushing any sort of accusations forward on your own. Its definitely noteworthy.
The picture has a lot of words in it.
In all seriousness I think King might be OMGUSing.
I'm torn between Toog (for reasons I stated above) and King (for reason stated right above).-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
-
-
KingTwelveSixteen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 421
- Joined: November 25, 2010
- Location: Lawrenceville Goargia
???Slaxx wrote:Toogeloo I find it funny you are shooting down other reasons for FoSs but not pushing any sort of accusations forward on your own. Its definitely noteworthy.
Nobody has FoSed anyone yet.
Give me a reason why my votes havn't been justified or they arn't OMGUSes.Slaxx wrote:
1000 for the picture+6=1,006.Hiraki wrote:
What do you think about my reasoning?Slaxx wrote:Toogeloo I find it funny you are shooting down other reasons for FoSs but not pushing any sort of accusations forward on your own. Its definitely noteworthy.
The picture has a lot of words in it.
In all seriousness I think King might be OMGUSing.
I'm torn between Toog (for reasons I stated above) and King (for reason stated right above).
NINJA EDIT: ..."Tooo jumpy"? "Conclusive logic"? What?ShowWin-Loss Ratio
2-3 Town
1-0 Scum
0-0 Third Party
3-3 overall-
-
Slaxx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: January 1, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
-
-
Hiraki Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12372
- Joined: September 16, 2010
The vote in #24 is an oblivious OMGUS. You're voting someone for accusing you of something(which you are, but that's not the point). If I tell Slaxx that he has a giant bee on his head, he won't vote me because there isn't a bee on his head.King wrote:Give me a reason why my votes havn't been justified
tl;dr: You've taken LaLwayout of proportion and come off as inordinately jumpy, and ready to strike at any time.-
-
Toogeloo Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8437
- Joined: October 21, 2009
- Location: Jusenkyo
Am I supposed to have a scum read on page 2? I guess amongst all these people with scum reads on page 1, it seems a little abnormal. That's not how I play though, get used to it.Slaxx wrote:Toogeloo I find it funny you are shooting down other reasons for FoSs but not pushing any sort of accusations forward on your own. Its definitely noteworthy.-
-
Slaxx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: January 1, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
-
-
Slaxx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7382
- Joined: January 1, 2010
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-