Empking wrote:neil1113 wrote:1. Developing a wagon, and finding that person to be scummy, yes. RVS votes, into an ACTUAL wagon, yes. Catching scum amongst the midst of that like you, yes. It's catching scum.
MOI's vote on me was random?
Was it not? That's what I have it down as in my notes?
Empking wrote:Neil_1113 wrote:2. Of course not, but because you continue to misrep and continue this dreaded attempt at making me look scummy by twisting and stretching things about me, nobody else has really said anything. So until people start getting involved, I can't get reads or question anyone else?
So you're using the question mark trick again.
Lol. Yes. You use question marks when you ask a question. I was asking you, until people start getting involved, I can't get reads or question anyone else, do you oppose that? Can you develop reads on people who say nothing?
Empking wrote:Neil_1113 wrote: So until then, I'll continue to further the case of how scummy you are, by watching your scum-tells that you're releasing by the bucket.
Pointless noise and rhetoric.
Pointless? I told you how scummy you're being, and you would call it pointless? Noted.
Neil_1113 wrote:cj: Scum only care about finding one mis-lynch a day. neil only want to find one player that he wants to be lynched. What are your thoughts on that?
Prove that I have ever said "I only want to find one player lynched"?
Empking wrote:So you didn't respond to an accusation of you not scumhunting by saying "Lol. Wow. Enough said. I've caught scum. You."? Is that what you're saying?
No, I said prove to me where I only want to find one player that I want to lynch? I found you out as scum, so I want you lynched. But how does that imply you're the ONLY person I want lynched, and I don't want to hear from anyone else? You've failed at this example.
Neil_1113 wrote:What do you think about the fact that neil doesn't seem to have any desire to scumhunt?
Since when was I not scum hunting? I'm scum hunting, and I'm finding you scummy. Just because I'm scum hunting and my current focus is YOU doesn't mean I'm not scum hunting.
Empking wrote:Other than rhetoric and plays for sympathy what have you actually said about me?
I asked you to prove me wrong. Prove to me that I have done no scum hunting? Hint hint, you can't. You fail at your response here, as well.
Neil_1113 wrote:What do you think of neil's habit of writing statements where everything is implied rather than said and as such gives him plausible deniability?
"Statements." Key word. Give me two times in which I've implied something, and not said it straight up? Otherwise, you're leading.
Empking wrote:"Please tell me everyone else realizes that everyone who challenges Empking is called scum by him?" and your "Biggest wagon?"
Biggest Wagon, I had something implied yes. Your first example, I was honestly asking a question. Again, that's what you do when you ask a question. You include a question mark. You fail at THIS example as well.
Neil_1113 wrote:What do you think of neil's insistence that he challenged me before I voted him? Kind of makes it clear that he's scum, right?
I called you out on this earlier, and you gave me no response. Show me one example in which I've stated I challenged you before you voted me?
Empking wrote:That was your implied vs stating trick.
Or in other words, you took words that I did not say, and assumed them to be my opinion, while in reality you have no proof that this is indeed what I was implying? Scummy much? Town find scummy things about people, not twist things and make things up in order to FIT their idea of that person being scum. You fail at this example.
Neil_1113 wrote:What alignment is so afraid of 1 (one) vote that they wagon the largest wagon and try and discredit the person voting them? And then when called out for it just strawmnan the argument?
Where have I said that I was afraid of your vote? Where did I say I was trying to discredit you?
Empking wrote:This is ridiculous. You didn't say it therefore it can'ty be true. I vote you and in order to discredit me you call me a lousy player (And we know its an attempt to discredit me because you later tried to pretend it was just a coincidence.)
You stated it as a fact. You can't prove it. Simple enough. And what do you mean, we all know? You're the only one that has made such implications. And as the town's leading wagon, you have no position to be speaking for us. I told you I had no intention in discrediting you. You discredited yourself.
The fact is, you cannot prove any of your leading questions, and I gave you a chance. You had 5 chances, and you only even came CLOSE to giving an actual answer to one of them. The rest were "I thought" or "You implied" or "I assumed" yet you couldn't quote a single post of mine to back up your leading questions. What townie would do that? I'm struggling so hard to see the possibility of you being town, but with every post you convince me otherwise. You've stretched, you've lied, you've been deceitful, and you've implicated things about me that just simply are not true. Things that you can't prove one way or another, and things that you can only say "Well think about it, he COULD POSSIBLY mean..." You have a crap case on me. You had a crap case on him. You are not a town leader, and you are scum. If this doesn't prove it, I don't know what would. I asked you for proof, you came up with none. You were left wanting, and hanging onto nothing. You have no case. You have no position to argue. You have no vote that would actually intimidate me. Good day sir, and prepare to be lynched.