Mini Normal 1187: Game Over

[hiplop]

unvote

vote archaebob

for taking everything too seriously

[pappums rat]

Vote Count 1.1

nintendoaddict1 - 2 (archaebob, Heliman)
DemonHybrid - 2 (Scumhunter, ace5993)
archaebob- 2 (Giitah, hiplop)
Spadille - 1 (nintendoaddict1)
Heliman - 1 (Spadille)
hiplop - 1 (Barry Allen)
Barry Allen - 1 (jilynne1991)

Not voting - Pine, Deuxieme Octopus, DemonHybrid

With 13 alive it takes 7 votes to lynch.

The deadline for Day 1 is 12 A.M. on June 26, 2011.

[nintendoaddict1]

RVS: Spad

cause it sounds like spud.

Why are you labeling your vote as random? Nervous much?

vote: nintendoaddict1

Cause I used random.org and then typed up some lolwut reason.

Using a randomizer to pick your vote and then making sure everyone knows just how random it is defeats the purpose of a random vote, and makes you sound like nervous scum.

Wagon please.

No, I like to make it clear when I am using an RVS vote, because some people do not make it known, thus it makes it very confusing as to whether or not it is actually random, so unless I say RVS I am making a serious vote.

[archaebob]

@ nintendoaddict -

What do you think the purpose of RVS is?

[nintendoaddict1]

@ nintendoaddict -

What do you think the purpose of RVS is?

Reactions. And not voting at all makes one look scummy, so RVS.

[Heliman]

Reactions. And not voting at all makes one look scummy, so RVS.

BAAAANHH! Isnt it to generate disscusson?

Using a randomizer to pick your vote and then making sure everyone knows just how random it is defeats the purpose of a random vote, and makes you sound like nervous scum.

how does saying you're using a randomizer defeat the pourpos of a vote that's inherently random to begin with that makse no sense

[archaebob]

@ nintendoaddict -

What do you think the purpose of RVS is?

Reactions.

Exactly. Do you think you are likely to get a reaction from anyone if you tell the whole world that your vote is random?

The town starts off the game with

nothing

, and the rvs is designed to be a first step towards content generation. Believe it or not, even rvs votes contain tiny little pieces of alignment revealing content in them. It's not much, and it usually becomes unimportant later in the game, but it is

how the town starts figuring out who is who

.

By using a randomizer, you are preventing

any

content from seeping into your vote, and guaranteeing that your target will shrug you off without even one awkward incriminating sentence of defense.

Ok?

unvote vote Giitah

why the

FUCK

did you vote me!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!??!??!??!?!?!?

You obviously are buddies with nintendoaddict.

[Giitah]

Picking apart reactions, archaebob. You seem to have a lot to say, jumping around pointing your guns like that - are you sure you aren't just looking for someone to start wagoning on? You seem to want to jump the gun pretty fast, right?

[jilynne1991]

I don't see anything wrong with what archaebob is doing, but it might be a bit early to start nitpicking.

Most people start doing that, when everyone's commenting and we're *clearly* out of RVS.

[ace5993]

Picking apart reactions, archaebob. You seem to have a lot to say, jumping around pointing your guns like that - are you sure you aren't just looking for someone to start wagoning on? You seem to want to jump the gun pretty fast, right?

Why so defensive? Looks to me like he's just trying to get us out of RVS.

[nintendoaddict1]

Do you think you are likely to get a reaction from anyone if you tell the whole world that your vote is random?

Aren't all votes early in the game RVS anyway? Labeling a few of them does not make every other vote a serious one.

[Giitah]

@Ace Well, it was that or go for a really lame answer like 'it was a joke vote'.

[archaebob]

Picking apart reactions, archaebob. You seem to have a lot to say, jumping around pointing your guns like that - are you sure you aren't just looking for someone to start wagoning on? You seem to want to jump the gun pretty fast, right?

Why so defensive? Looks to me like he's just trying to get us out of RVS.

If you think he's defensive, why not vote him? It'd certainly be a more productive place for it then where it is right now.

[Giitah]

Okay, so you have my reasoning. Do you have any answer or are you planning on sitting on me?

[jilynne1991]

I wouldn't say what archebob is doing anything bad, since it will certainly be helpful later.

[nintendoaddict1]

I wouldn't say what archebob is doing anything bad, since it will certainly be helpful later.

Unless he is scum. Then it would have been all to throw us off.

[Pine]

VOTE: Giitah

Way overreacting to someone skimming RVS and misunderstanding.

Oh hey! I'm already out of RVS. Thank god.

[ace5993]

Picking apart reactions, archaebob. You seem to have a lot to say, jumping around pointing your guns like that - are you sure you aren't just looking for someone to start wagoning on? You seem to want to jump the gun pretty fast, right?

Why so defensive? Looks to me like he's just trying to get us out of RVS.

If you think he's defensive, why not vote him? It'd certainly be a more productive place for it then where it is right now.

I just wanted an answer to my question, I did not feel like voting him would have improved the situation. We don't need a wagon every single time someone does something even the slightest bit scummy.

[Giitah]

I wouldn't say what archebob is doing anything bad, since it will certainly be helpful later.

Unless he is scum. Then it would have been all to throw us off.

WIFOM; don't bother with that reasoning. All I really see worthy of deducing from this is association for later-game.

@Pine And you don't see what he's doing as an overreaction/off the top at all...?

[archaebob]

Picking apart reactions, archaebob. You seem to have a lot to say, jumping around pointing your guns like that - are you sure you aren't just looking for someone to start wagoning on? You seem to want to jump the gun pretty fast, right?

Why so defensive? Looks to me like he's just trying to get us out of RVS.

If you think he's defensive, why not vote him? It'd certainly be a more productive place for it then where it is right now.

I just wanted an answer to my question, I did not feel like voting him would have improved the situation. We don't need a wagon every single time someone does something even the slightest bit scummy.

Later in the game, no. Right now, that's

exactly

when we should have wagons, because nothing has happened yet.

It's not a question of whether or not Giitah "deserves" a wagon right now. It's a question of maximizing your vote at all time. Later in the game that means voting for who you think is scum. Right now it means voting for the scummiest thing that has happened so far.

You are currently choosing to keep your vote on your RVS choice when there

is

a more compelling place for it. Why?

[DemonHybrid]

Vote: DemonHybrid

for being the only person I know in this game.

Vote: Ace5993

for not updating me on how ScoreHero Mafia has been lately.

[jilynne1991]

Vote: DemonHybrid

for ditching games.

[DemonHybrid]

Vote: DemonHybrid

for ditching games.

=( It's hard to keep up when I replace in. Fresh starts are nice.

Also,

Unvote, Vote: hiplop

. archaebob is not new and he's certainly not taking anything TOO seriously. The point of RVS is to leave RVS, and so far, you have the sketchiest vote of everyone.

[Spadille]

Posting from a random guy's phone.

V/LA until Wednesday. Too busy to play regularly. If I fail to post after Wednesday, prod me. If I fail to pick it up, replace me.

~Noted

-pappums rat

[jilynne1991]

DemonHybrid, just saying, but I caught up just fine. (Oh wait, nevermind, I have pretty much all the time in the world.)

Ok, well then

Unvote: DemonHybrid, Vote: Heliman

since I hate helicopters.