Jahudo wrote:WeyounsLastClone wrote:Not to beat the 'no lynch' horse (or pony in this case) again, but I really don't get why you would vote No Lynch during random voting stage. If you're not trying to tie yourself to anyone, I think that's more beneficial as scum than town. It's a RVS for a reason.
Vote: TheLonging'
Need to read some other games of chesskid to see if this is how he plays. If so, it's a bit too 'flippant'. (not sure if that's the exact word I'm looking for, but hope you get what I mean).
So why did you vote for TheLonging? Was it a typo, random vote, or do you have a reason?
A miscollection on my part. When entering my post I somehow remembered The Longing as the one who voted 'no lynch', and chesskid as a player with a high-and-mighty attitude who just shoots one-shots. At that point I found the 'no lynch' random vote more suspicious, so voted The Longing, but in the end both behaviors I mentioned in my post were one and the same.
Jahudo wrote:
I don't understand how a random vote ties someone to another person, I never look at random votes later in the game when players have been flipped and its time to look for connections. It has always seemed like an arbitrary move, and the part of it that scum are actively thinking about is how they can blend in given the unique situation of the game whether its focus on an early wagon or mechanics being discussed.
I will admit it's a lot of WIFOM, but the only way I would see someone going for a 'no lynch' vote during RVS is because for some reason they want not to be tied to anyone. Which to me feels as scum, as town would have no reason to not random vote (in my opinion that is). If you don't like a random vote at all, then do not vote at all, but not start voting 'no lynch'.