Execution Mafia: Days of the Cold War GAMEOVER

[SleepyKrew]

1. Because you aren't open to discussion. Scummy.
2. You're a VI.

[vezokpiraka]

1. Because you aren't open to discussion. Scummy.
2. You're a VI.

Why am I not open to discussion? I will vote someone if I feel they are giving strong town tells or are merely good at finding scum.

[SleepyKrew]

vote Moi

I'm not going to support anyone else executioner unless it's me.

That's not what this says.

[Codfish]

SK, my straight out opinion of vezok was that he's a leaning VI townie until I read the MoI vote and adjoining text.
That's just a weird and obvious contradiction. FoS.

[SleepyKrew]

The MoI vote was his first post. What were you looking at before that?

[Codfish]

By adjoining text I mean post 27. While you've already said it in a roundabout way, post 27 is a straight out contradiction of the MoI vote which I don't like, so I'm getting stronger scummy vibes/VI vibes from vezok. As of which between scum/idiot, IMO it's too early to tell.

[Quilford]

You're kidding, right Quil?

1. He's completely unopen to discussion. Anti-town.

Exaggeration.

2. He's vezok. Do you want vezok to have the kill?

Prejudice.

And you're calling him anti-town. Nuh-uh.

[Quilford]

By adjoining text I mean post 27. While you've already said it in a roundabout way, post 27 is a straight out contradiction of the MoI vote which I don't like, so I'm getting stronger scummy vibes/VI vibes from vezok. As of which between scum/idiot, IMO it's too early to tell.

Kill this guy when we elect you, vezok.

[SleepyKrew]

vote Moi

I'm not going to support anyone else executioner unless it's me.

Why am I not open to discussion? I will vote someone if I feel they are giving strong town tells or are merely good at finding scum.

See it yet Quil?

[Quilford]

That's not scummy.

[Codfish]

@ Quil, I don't see vezok elected the way it's going.

And as for you,

1. You're against any discussion outside of "Go vezok Go!"
2. You're clearly defending a person with scum reads from SK and I.

Open your eyes.

[SleepyKrew]

Quil, it's a blatant contradiction.
Cod, don't throw me into the same boat as you. You were attacking me at the beginning, why the sudden flip?

[Codfish]

I didn't attack you, merely question you. I flipped since vezok contradicted which is a much clearer thing to be looking at.

[Quilford]

@ Quil, I don't see vezok elected the way it's going.

And as for you,

1. You're against any discussion outside of "Go vezok Go!"₁
2. You're clearly defending a person with scum reads from SK and I.²

Open your eyes.

¹ Where has there been any other discussion that doesn't regard vesok; how have I been against it?
² How have I been defending vezok? Why are you speaking for SK?

[Quilford]

Quil, it's a blatant contradiction.

Scumminess is not innate to contradictions.

[SleepyKrew]

Then what the hell

is

scummy Quil?

[Quilford]

Codfish's recent posts and the one of yours that I quoted a while back.

[SleepyKrew]

I'd actually rather kill Quil right now, on the chance that he's buddying to vezok because he's scum and knows vezok is town.

[Codfish]

@ Quil, I don't see vezok elected the way it's going.

And as for you,

1. You're against any discussion outside of "Go vezok Go!"₁
2. You're clearly defending a person with scum reads from SK and I.²

Open your eyes.

¹ Where has there been any other discussion that doesn't regard vesok; how have I been against it?
² How have I been defending vezok? Why are you speaking for SK?

Don't twist my words. I clearly stated that you're against non-pro-vezok discussion. Of course there hasn't been non-vezok discussion.
You've been being pro-vezok ie defending vezok. The facts are laid out for you and you're basically ignoring them.

I'm not speaking for SK, just along similar lines after the inconsistencies from vezok. His conclusion may be the same as mine; that doesn't necessarily mean I'm being his loyal dog or he mine.

My posts are in no way scummy, Quil; you merely seem to be reacting against my push against vezok with a push of your own. What I was going to say was you're trying to garner favour with vezok here, but SK got in while I was posting, so I'd be repeating him.

[Codfish]

I'd actually rather kill Quil right now, on the chance that he's buddying to vezok because he's scum and knows vezok is town.

Why would vezok act like that if he's town? I'm for vezok kill and Quil later.

[SleepyKrew]

Because vezok is an idiot.
Last sentence of post 44, you agree with what you just quoted. But now you disagree.

[Quilford]

I think those 3D glasses have done something to your brain, SK.

Codfish. Explain how I am being pro-vezok (outside of my vote for him).

[Quilford]

vote Moi

I'm not going to support anyone else executioner unless it's me.

1. Because you aren't open to discussion. Scummy.
2. You're a VI.

Why am I not open to discussion? I will vote someone if I feel they are giving strong town tells or are merely good at finding scum.

So the 'case' on vezok seems to be that these two posts are a contradiction. They are, sure, but I don't see how this contradiction makes him scummy. I regard the former post as a bit of hyperbole, in the way you would say 'Obama is the only suitable candidate for the Presidential Election', or something like that.

[Quilford]

EBWOP: And since the first post seems to me as hyperbole and therefore a statement not meant to be taken seriously, I don't see how it's a scummy contradiction.

[Codfish]

Last sentence of post 44, you agree with what you just quoted. But now you disagree.

Conceded. However, you yourself stated that it was "a chance" that Quil is garnering favour. A removal of incompetence is more secure.

@ Quil, This has been done to death. His posts get scratchier as they go along and you still buddy-buddy him.