Mini 1238 - One After the Other - Over!

[Friend]

Fuck I am falling down all of these stairs.

I missed RVS!

IT KEEPS.
HAPPENING!

No, you don't lynch trap setters, traps are inherently pro-town.
VOTE: Whispersilk.

I fucking hate vote tags, can I just use bold?
Goddamn ninjas.
UNVOTE: Whispersilk
VOTE: pseudonymous

I think you're missing the point, Whiskers. Monk's "trap" wasn't a trap at all. How the hell is what monk did a trap? It's not.

[Empking]

Ha, I was just about to post a with scare quotes in!

It was going to be like:

Maybe I should say Lynch All "Trap-Setters".

[monk]

Two objectives, find opportunistic scum, end rvs. Empking decided I was scum from the littlest thing lets go

[Empking]

Two objectives, find opportunistic scum, end rvs. Empking decided I was scum from the littlest thing lets go

See, I can understand the second motive though I disagree with it. Its a shame for you that you didn't just go with that from the beginning.
The first point is just bull though

[Hiraki]

Monk isn't scum due to join date.

[Whiskers]

Monk, Y U End RVS? We don't even have everypony checked in yet.

Furthermore, I brought y'all a little gift-- for Killjoy, or our mod M to use-- This character basically represents all the haters. You can imagine here, if you'd like, she's saying, "FUCK DEM PONIES!" but she wasn't, 'cause it's a kids' show.

[preedit]
Nope, it's pretty easy; You set up a thing and see who votes with you. Trap.
[Preedit2]
Also wrong. If he's new he should not be setting traps.
If his join date was in 2008, he'd be cleared by now.

[Empking]

Monk isn't scum due to join date.

I presume you're not claiming that a 2011 joindate doesn't make you immune from getting a scum PM so...

[monk]

Monk isn't scum due to join date.

wut

[whispersilk]

VOTE: Friend

Because he is opportunistic.

This vote is subject to change once I understand what just happened while I was trying to post.

Empking ninja'd me. I was literally typing the same thing he was saying but I decided to post it anyways because it makes sense.

Why do you consider wagoning opportunistic?

Because I don't understand yet what the trap was or how it proves anything. All I know is you jumped at the opportunity to vote empking too. Like I said, this might change once I understand what just happened.

[monk]

Monk, Y U End RVS? We don't even have everypony checked in yet.

I just don't like RVS it is largely distracting and I want to get out of it asap

[whispersilk]

Ok, monk changed his vote during RVS pretty quickly, and Empking jumped on it and called it scummy. monk claims to have set a trap to see who pointed it out, and it turned out to be Empking. Friend also then jumped on monk.

Personally, I don't think there is anything wrong with changing your vote during RVS, because it elicits reactions from people as it did in this case. monk has no reason to claim it was a trap, other than it really was a trap. Empking reacted and used it as a reason to vote for monk. I don't like that. Friend used it as a reason to vote for monk too. I don't like that either.

People usually end up calling me whisper, which I think is going to be a little confusing in this game.

[Friend]

Personally, I don't think there is anything wrong with changing your vote during RVS, because it elicits reactions from people as it did in this case. monk has no reason to claim it was a trap, other than it really was a trap. Empking reacted and used it as a reason to vote for monk. I don't like that. Friend used it as a reason to vote for monk too. I don't like that either.

I don't think there is either. You're misunderstanding my position. I think it's scummy that instead of saying "there's nothing wrong with changing your vote in RVS, it's not a big deal, calm down" he said "LOL it was a trap Empking I've caught you as scum." It makes no sense unless he's nervous about his play, which I find scummy. Town have no reason to be nervous.

[Killjoy]

Monk, Y U End RVS? We don't even have everypony checked in yet.

I just don't like RVS it is largely distracting and I want to get out of it asap

I feel the same way. I don't get how people analyze Day 1 RVS for hidden motivations when the only thing that matters is the intitial wagon to end RVS.

I'll post more later. In class at the moment. Thank you for the avatar, Whiskers. Now post something of worth.

[Friend]

Whiskers, why do you like RVS? What's wrong with wanting to scumhunt?

Killjoy, can you answer my questions in Post 16?

[Empking]

Personally, I don't think there is anything wrong with changing your vote during RVS, because it elicits reactions from people as it did in this case. monk has no reason to claim it was a trap, other than it really was a trap. Empking reacted and used it as a reason to vote for monk. I don't like that. Friend used it as a reason to vote for monk too. I don't like that either.

I don't think there is either. You're misunderstanding my position. I think it's scummy that instead of saying "there's nothing wrong with changing your vote in RVS, it's not a big deal, calm down" he said "LOL it was a trap Empking I've caught you as scum." It makes no sense unless he's nervous about his play, which I find scummy. Town have no reason to be nervous.

Quite well said.

Silk: If there's nothing wrong with having two random votes then how does it lead one out of RVS?

[whispersilk]

Personally, I don't think there is anything wrong with changing your vote during RVS, because it elicits reactions from people as it did in this case. monk has no reason to claim it was a trap, other than it really was a trap. Empking reacted and used it as a reason to vote for monk. I don't like that. Friend used it as a reason to vote for monk too. I don't like that either.

I don't think there is either. You're misunderstanding my position. I think it's scummy that instead of saying "there's nothing wrong with changing your vote in RVS, it's not a big deal, calm down" he said "LOL it was a trap Empking I've caught you as scum." It makes no sense unless he's nervous about his play, which I find scummy. Town have no reason to be nervous.

That's my entire point. I don't see monk changing his vote as scummy, but Empking jumped on it as an excuse to vote for monk. It was only

afterwards

that monk claimed it was a plan.

Seeing as we both agree that there is nothing wrong with changing your vote during RVS, who made the scummier action first? Empking for using monks vote change as a reason to vote him and call it scummy, or monk for claiming it was a plan?

[Friend]

Monk claiming it was a plan. I don't find changing your vote in RVS scummy, but that doesn't mean I find people who think it's scummy scummy.

[Empking's Alt]

Silk: If there's nothing wrong with having two random votes then how does it lead one out of RVS?

[whispersilk]

@ I find that strange considering your own stance on the matter.

[whispersilk]

^@Friend

[Friend]

@ I find that strange considering your own stance on the matter.

Why?

[monk]

Empking, are we still in RVS?

[Killjoy]

Killjoy, I assume this is your first game. What brought you to Mafiascum? Do you have other experience with mafia?

This is my first game on this site. I have played games on another site as well as EpicMafia.

EpicMafia... doesn't appeal to me at all. Mostly children with snivel seeping from all orifices.

For all intents and purposes, this is my first game.

[Empking's Alt]

Silk: If there's nothing wrong with having two random votes then how does it lead one out of RVS?

Monk: Thanks to me, we're not.

[Empking]

Silk: If there's nothing wrong with having two random votes then how does it lead one out of RVS?

Monk: Thanks to me, we're not.