except for my explanation here:Ztife wrote:DJ in a nutshell:
Defends RC.
Argues about why we should not lynchSK(SCUM > SK).
Hammers RC whom he thinks is SK.
Unless he's telling me he hammered someone he thinks is vig
Was going to give him a chance to explain.. but now im sure. Lynching RC is not the problem. The problem is changing your stance with no real explaination.
here:dj wrote:most likely scenario based on the evidence at hand(taking into account claims, nk's and gameplay):
ztife/SAS vs RCbpsk vs vanilla town.
and here:dj wrote:i also love how ztife keeps saying "we could have a doc" when its totally fucking obvious that noone here is a doctor. and yet, all of the scenarios that i have thrown out are "crazy". he is not acting like his own lynch would end in a town loss. he is just trying to argue to keep himself alive. my bet is he is SAS partner and is honestly unsure of whether or not we are in multi-ball which is why he is pushing the idea so forcefully.
its a pretty clear thought process. I wasn't getting what I considered the optimal lynch, so I compromised based on the evidence. I pitched RC a couple important questions which he skirted and then he self voted. I got tired of trying to convince everyone of the 3pscum team possibility. its not rocket science.dj wrote:ok. that selfie looks like a last ditch effort by a desperate sk. i'll bite on the 2p scum vs sk vs all vanilla town.
exactly what I have been saying. no one was listening to me. for some reason, people were scared of an sk/vig. bump made a couple of good points to which I simply disagreed. otherwise, I very consistently spoke against the RC lynch. I came around to it after much discussion. its not like I was just like "herp derp, hammer." your case is entirely inconsistent with what you were saying yesterday. my case on you is still the same. you pushed the lynch towards the sk/vig spouting contradictory statistics and claiming that it was somehow in towns best interest, when, in fact, there was only ONE SINGLE scenario where it was the optimal lynch(that being multi-ball). in the 3p/sk/town scenario it would be a death knell, and in the MOST LIKELY scenario 2p/sk/town it was a gamble. in no way a priority. best case is that it didn't matter which anti-town was lynched. so me hammering what we all seemed to agree was a guy who was flipping sk in a 2pscum set-up is not contradictory to anything I preached other than me wanting us to be cautious and lynch the scum first. the scum being the guy who was doing everything in his power to convince us the WE HAD TO LYNCH THE SK pushing his arguments based on the LEAST LIKELY SCENARIO.ztife wrote:I was at practically at L-1 too anyway, but he knew he couldn't push my lynch.In post 954, don_johnson wrote: i think 2p scum/sk/vanillatown is more likely than multi-ball.
i think 3pscum/townwithvig is more likely than multi-ball.
based on those two scenarios, there is no need to lynch RC today. he can be dealt with tomorrow. only player who really needs him lynched today would be a scum player. so whatevz.
this is exhausting.
p-edit:
or if you are scum. which makes more sense because it made much more sense yesterday for scum to be pushing his lynch. and that I only hammered after a full day of discussion in which I did everything in my power to convince everyone to lynch you. but let's not talk about that part...ztife wrote:Me pushing RC lynch is scummy, you hammering issin't. Hmm, not sure if I get the logic here unless you are scum.
or the part where I explained to bump why I disagreed with his theories. lets not talk about that either. lets cherry pick quotes and hang on to the only hope scumztife has of pinning the responsibility of the viglynch onto the one fucking guy who fought it all day long based on the evidence.
again, what I take away from post 986 is this:
bolded is the part that is complete bullshit and proof that you are scum. in the 2pscum/sk scenario it is irrelevant who is lynched. sk is NOT PRIORITY to winning. except of course, for you. the remaining scum. also, multi-ball is the least likely set-up of any we discussed based on the COMPLETE LACK OF TWO NIGHTKILLS ON 2/3 of the nights. now you are starting to annoy me.ztife wrote:Precisely, multi-ball with a doc(fire and ice setup) and sk + 2 scum + 10 VTs are more possible setups since they are balanced,and in these cases lynching RC is priority to winning.