Mafiascum.net

Anyone around these days? :\

the silent speaker wrote:If my

restriction

were triggered, it wouldn't be detectable in the posts I've already made, and as I said once before, a ruthless analysis could detect it. It's more likely to stand out in shorter posts, simply because it's less buried there. My

role

is another matter, of course.

If there's a reason for you to not share I won't ask why
However, if not, I'm very tempted to pry
Is there a reason some people don't tell restriction?
Can't be much of a secret if it shows in your diction.

One more vote and then I can drop a ruthless hammer blow.

There's no reason I shouldn't announce my restriction, but equally I don't see any moving reason why I . Does it make a difference one way or the other? If I needed to claim, then sure, but otherwise why bother?

Do you get an investigation or something if you Hammer?

It doesnt sound like a Scum power so I guess we dont really want to know

Stikey wrote:Anyone around these days? :\

EBWOP: Anyone around to smurf these days? It seems like the conversation is smurfing low. Hopefully, people will start smurfing more soon!

(It's not just the ducks who forget their restrictions once in a while, unfortunately )

the silent speaker wrote:There's no reason I shouldn't announce my restriction, but equally I don't see any moving reason why I

should

. Does it make a difference one way or the other? If I needed to claim, then sure, but otherwise why bother?

My rela erason forr whyy youu SHUOLD is htat it igves everoyne lese a better raed on yuo, in htat thye cann disassocaite anytihng youu imght ahve asid thruogh psot erstriction rfom waht youu mihgt ahve been intendnig to sayy in thee ifrst plac.e
I odnt seee anyawy it davantages csum, andd it mayy be helpufl to thee tonw, so I seee no resaon nott to..

For t-those p-players who d-don't want to l-lynch Twomz (the s-silent majority, it s-seems): who is a b-better choice and w-why? P-personally, I still think T-twomz should be lynched. There are n-nine p-people voting um...uh...Twomz, and TSS w-wants to v-vote him. What d-does everyone else th-think?

Twomz is dirty or annoying? No vote without reason.

He's quacking Dirty. FITLHY SCUM!


Quack, Quack!

It's a pure metagaming choice, based on his truth in claiming vanilla in another game.

But...oh shit, now the metagaming police might come after me. << >> OH FUCK!!!! PLEASE DONT KILL ME!!!!!!!!

If one of you sirs can point to a post where Twomz violated his supposed restriction, I'd be happy to vote for him, sir!

Until then, I don't see why we're bandwagoning him!

Sir!

Post 184 and Quack 242, as far as I can tell.


He's basically being really shady overall.

Harry_Potter is replacing Draygn effective as soon as he confirms. Thanks for replacing!

Glork wrote:Post 184 and Quack 242, as far as I can tell.

Im nott intneding to defedn ihm, butt thsoe aree obth ujst wrnog:

.,,184

Twomz wrote: Why haven't they shipped it out yet . My compy should have been sent out, but I don't think they've even started on it yet . Hopefully it will be in before I leave for my mission trip.

242.,.

Twomz wrote: Why doesn't Windows Media Center come w/ freaken Word and Powerpoint . Freaken pissed me off. Then I had to go and dig through a pile of CDs to find our XP install disks, and then It wouldn't let me not install Outlook (which sucks bigtime)... OMFG.

Btoh jsut sohved in thee middle as he wass talkign. If it wsant uqite so baltantly wrogn I'dd be htinking youu ewre rtying to laed us up thee gadren paht Glrok Thta siad, im still consideering towmz forr ylnch, cetrainly wtih hiss metaagming afux pa,s butt i ened to seee somehting a ilttle omre ocncrete ebfore my vtoe oges bcak on..

Oh, adn wlecome Hrary!

Um, oopies.


The interludes weren't nearly as blatant or profound, so I didn't really notice them. I was looking for the "OMG A STAPLER!!!" type posts.


Quack!

Greetings, and thank you for allowing me to take over for my brother in these auspicious proceedings. I will endeavor to help in any way I can.

24 hours and no posts. Looks like we need a deadline.



Standard deadline rules apply.

W-well, according to the um...uh...d-deadline rules, the p-player with the most v-votes will be l-lynched at d-deadline. If things st-stay the same way they are n-now, T-Twomz will be lynched. I'm p-personally in f-favor of this l-lynch, so I d-don't really m-mind it. Those of you against it, h-however, should t-try to form another c-case if you b-believe Twomz to be t-town.

Just checking in seeing as I haven't quacked for a bit. Still happy with a Twomz quack, especially with the deadline aquacking.

Thikn weer 2 aawy rfom a towmz lynhc noww - itll hpapen anyawy unlses somethnig maojr cocurs in thee enxt feww adys, hwich is nulikely, so Im happy to putt thee penultiamte onee on forr TSSS to rdop thee hammer - IF he is wliling to exlpain hiss pots restritcion.

DGb replaces Vaughn!

Holy hot dog!

I am relieved Vaughn finally checked into rehab, you will now have the pleasure to play with a clean and sober player.

I totally disown all of Vaughn's actions, especially the vote for the Mason, which MUST have been the result of a very convincing hallucination, involving anything from yodeling yogurt to gorillas in tutus.




As a replacement, I am not particularly comfortable hammering Twomz, however scummy he may look. He's hilarious. I would miss him.

I hope you don't mind allowing me to ease gently into this end of the day.

Uh. So Vaughn faked his post restriction?





I think we've found a scumbag.

Whoa, Glork! Not so fast with your vote! Where did I say he faked a post restriction?

the silent speaker (Post 212) wrote:Vaughn, correct me if my impression of your last post is wrong, but the restriction you claim is ten words per post, once per RL day, with votes not counting toward the ten?

Vaughn (Post 238) wrote:Maybe Twomz wants to be lynched. TSS: Yes, Yes, Kinda