Street Racers: Las Vegas (Game over!)

Brian Skies · Post Post #4125 (ISO) » Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:32 pm

This game. Was it eaten by tigers?

StrangerCoug · Post Post #4126 (ISO) » Wed Feb 26, 2014 2:45 am

Yep. I'll give you some extra time, though.

jmo16mla · Post Post #4127 (ISO) » Wed Feb 26, 2014 5:56 am

No. It wasnt eaten. The posts will be back on sunday or sometime around then.

sthar8 · Post Post #4128 (ISO) » Wed Feb 26, 2014 7:54 am

We're missing Brian's discussion of my interactions with Nati and how he thinks they might make me scum. Anything else?

sthar8 · Post Post #4129 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:31 am

@mod- can you update us on the deadline? Also are you giving us extra time or pausing us until the tigers give our posts back?

StrangerCoug · Post Post #4130 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:36 pm

I will be nice and reset the deadline timer to 24 hours once I'm aware that the posts have come back, but there never were plans to pause the game.

sthar8 · Post Post #4131 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:44 pm

SC- Appreciate it. I just couldn't remember what you'd said, and all the posts with current deadlines were eaten.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #4132 (ISO) » Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:45 pm

I originally just added six hours from what it was before.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #4133 (ISO) » Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:50 am

Prodded everybody. I know I'm being super lax about this, but damn...

jmo16mla · Post Post #4134 (ISO) » Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:16 pm

displaced · Post Post #4135 (ISO) » Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:32 pm

sorry been v/la due tomy daughter's birthday. I shouldve mentioned it

StrangerCoug · Post Post #4136 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:25 pm

I'd like this game to move on. At midnight MST ending tomorrow, I'm ending the day. That'll be in (expired on 2014-03-06 00:00:00).

sthar8 · Post Post #4137 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:50 pm

Sooo... whats up guys?

I'm totally down to no lynch again and force the scum's hand, especially since I don't have anything compelling to go on.

jmo16mla · Post Post #4138 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:03 pm

im on vacation, meh. give me a second.

jmo16mla · Post Post #4139 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:30 pm

VOTE: displaced

displaced · Post Post #4140 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:34 pm

OK so i went back into Greygnarl (sthar8's predecessor) I thought he was p town but I also thought something sketch was coming from the GG/Mathias/Thez convo and the others are dead town so...

In post 123, greygnarl wrote:get an avatar or policy lynch yourself

This is kinda a dumb thing, I guess it's a null statement but it's 'negatively null' if there's such a thing

In post 211, greygnarl wrote:Crimson can we please not play he tunneling game, all it does is distract people and cause people to not trust you.

This really sticks out on reread, since GiF said something similar which made me think town, but they way this is phrased makes me think GG was speaking to G&C from an informed perspective. (That GG already 'trusts' G&C is implicit given the phrasing)

In post 243, greygnarl wrote:
In post 241, Wake1 wrote:
In post 238, greygnarl wrote:Wake your posts are so manufactured.
Then put your vote where your mouth is, and make your case.
VOTE: Wake

Holy fuck are you confrontational. Notice how I did not say you were scum, or scummy, I just said that your play was manufactured. That's not a scumtell for you from what I can tell, and I was just pointing out, hoping maybe you would change. Pretty sketchy that you assume I'm attacking you and go into hiding.

For manufacturedness, you seem to act like you're hot shit asking specific people for reads, I hate this, it's what town blockers do, and I don't know why you think you're part of a townblock here, are they your scumbuddies?

This just seems really scummy now looking back. "Im voting you although Im not saying you are scum and the points I have against you are playstyle related which I dont consider alignment indicative" The tacked on "are they your scumbuddies" just feels shoehorned in

In post 420, greygnarl wrote:ooh wagon

This is in response to the burgeoning Herself wagon. Now earlier GG had voted Herself (and that vote had for a long time formed the basis of my thinking GG was town)
but now faced with an actual wagon he gets cold feet with going beyond some mild cheerleading.

displaced · Post Post #4141 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:43 pm

I also think the kills point toward stahr, particularly EtL BRO and AP (specifically the timing). Im thinking at this point Majiffy was looking for distance when EtL pointed out the subversion of the "No one is listening to me" towntell.

displaced · Post Post #4142 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:03 pm

Not going to have time to look at sthar in depth before deadline due to needing sleep.

Brian Skies · Post Post #4143 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:53 pm

In post 4128, sthar8 wrote:
We're missing Brian's discussion of my interactions with Nati and how he thinks they might make me scum.
Anything else?

Yeah, how I didn't site-flake and the reasoning for why I let myself get force-replaced in the game Displaced replaced into.

Regarding the bold, I never had anything like that in thread. My issue is with the way you treated Nati's claim like it was something to be protected and it was best to keep him alive as long as possible so that the scum-team would have to deal with him before suddenly flipping a 180 and pushing him hard once he retracted his claim (after it was already made pretty obvious that he wasn't a gunsmith).

Anyhow, I don't have time to do any real reading of this game before deadline so the no lynch is still fine for me. And I still want to look at what Displaced has said regarding the night kills.

displaced · Post Post #4144 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:10 am

Well you did also say something that kinda ponged of buddying too, Brian. ("Your play there was astounding and you fully deserve credit etc")

Still since we have some time I'll add that I picked up that sthar also wanted you investigated as well as Majiffy, which piqued my interest a little.

Also all of sthar's original suspicion is directed at townies, apart from Hannibal, who he has suspicion of right out the gate. I think this is more indicative of distancing/bus because even if Hannibal had made it through day one and I had been lynched in her stead, Hannibal would still have been lynched at a later date. Seems to me this would be obvious groundwork to lay replacing into a scum slot.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #4145 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2014 2:48 am

That's time. We don't have enough for a lynch, and even though everyone except Brian Skies had posted before the deadline, nobody had asked me for an extension. Sorry.

Nobody has been lynched on Day 9.

Night 9 ends in (expired on 2014-03-08 09:48:51).

StrangerCoug · Post Post #4146 (ISO) » Sat Mar 08, 2014 5:12 am

All seems to have been quiet lately. Too quiet. The last MRC member is a freaking coward, you've been saying.

Apparently, the last MRC member takes offense to being called a coward, and the anger ended up being vented on poor Sebastian Arlington and his Daytona. Sebastian was deliberately hit by a car while taking a ride around town, and you find his remains near a busy shopping mall.

Tell this guy it's not enough to be worth it.

displaced, who was

Sebastian Arlington, the driver of a 2006 Triumph Daytona 675 and a vanilla townie

, has been run over on Night 9.

Day 10 ends in (expired on 2014-03-11 12:12:44).

jmo16mla · Post Post #4147 (ISO) » Sat Mar 08, 2014 3:12 pm

In post 4106, jmo16mla wrote:
In post 2581, StrangerCoug wrote: displaced (7):
The Goodfather
,
Majiffy
,
GuyInFreezer
,
Gooner
,
Hannibal
,
JacobSavage
,
PeregrineV

Hannibal
(11): displaced,
ika
,
alienBRO
,
EspeciallyTheLies
,
MastinSSK
,
Grey and Crimson
, sthar8,
AngryPidgeon
,
Natirasha
, Mac,
Yates

Not voting (2): Brian Skies,
thezmon221
This is telling.

I'm an idiot. This virus has really gotten to me. I felt displaced was town with this, then voted him yesterday. wow.

You guys can go ahead and cross vote and start throwing shit everywhere.

sthar8 · Post Post #4148 (ISO) » Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:17 am

In post 4143, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 4128, sthar8 wrote:
We're missing Brian's discussion of my interactions with Nati and how he thinks they might make me scum.
Anything else?
Yeah, how I didn't site-flake and the reasoning for why I let myself get force-replaced in the game Displaced replaced into.

Regarding the bold, I never had anything like that in thread. My issue is with the way you treated Nati's claim like it was something to be protected and it was best to keep him alive as long as possible so that the scum-team would have to deal with him before suddenly flipping a 180 and pushing him hard once he retracted his claim (after it was already made pretty obvious that he wasn't a gunsmith).

Anyhow, I don't have time to do any real reading of this game before deadline so the no lynch is still fine for me. And I still want to look at what Displaced has said regarding the night kills.

I had just skimmed the posts and assumed that was what the big push was about.

Like I said before, Nati's claim had to resolve itself one way or the other. If he had been town, scum would have been forced to deal with him. Him being scum would also have become obvious at some point. His unclaim was that point. Up until then, wasting energy on Nati was actually a waste when we could have spent that energy catching his partners.

In post 4147, jmo16mla wrote:
You guys can go ahead and cross vote and start throwing shit everywhere.

Fuck that. This is manipulative as all hell. Brian's been way townier than you or mac.

VOTE: Jmo

Brian, if you're scum then your play was amazing and you deserve the win.

jmo16mla · Post Post #4149 (ISO) » Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:36 am

Manipulative? I wouldn't say that.

I suggest you unvote me if you're town.

Kinda risky to just jump out of the day and just vote me you know?