Meadow of Sorrow Mafia - Game Over! Town Wins

[Thestatusquo]

Well wuffles, after that first post, now there are two reasons. One, speculating on scum is scum, at least more often than not, and two, as a newish player on this site, I though you might think it cool to take out the mod of your last game. Seemed like a better hunch than a random vote.

vote: Wuffles.

[Wuffles_II]

Uh...I may be new to this site, TSQ, but the mindset you have on me is totally wrong. I may be new to 'scum, but this is my ninth game, mate.

I play over on WiFoM with all of the mafia league guys.

But, please, feel free to keep thinking I'm noob.

And you were in that game as well, TSQ.

[olio]

So it seems there is a normal mafiagroup and a satanic one. Former showing guilty to cops and latter guilty to church, however they get their information.

vote: EyeOfMordor

[Thestatusquo]

Wuffles, it was just a little bit better than a random vote. However, the second thing, and the fact that you ignored it, and focused on the other, obviously not strong thing in the post sort of makes me tick a little.

[Wuffles_II]

The fact that you posted such hypocritical logic, TSQ, makes me think you're being yourself :p.

You are in that game, too, lol.

Just because this is only my 3rd game on scum does NOT mean I'd do something stupid and noobish like get one up over the mod of my previous game, and I'd think you actually know that and are fishing for an overdefensive reaction.

Primate (Spoon on WiFoM, Pod on MTGS) is, in fact, one of my favourite mafia players, regardless of alignment. Games where he gets NK'd night 0 have lost a valuable source of mindless day 1 bandwagons...I mourn Primates loss. ^_^

[Thestatusquo]

YOU AGAIN IGNORE THE ACTUAL SUBSTANCE OF MY POST, and the real substantative reason I have for voting you. I already admitted what you're attacking was only slightly better than a random vote.

One, speculating on scum is scum,

This is my real reason for keeping my vote on you, which you have subsequently ignored in two posts.

[Save The Dragons]

Unvote, Vote: TSQ

I was under the impression that you :knewstuff: from before, but since you don't, and you're hosing/strawmanning, you're worthy of my vote.

[Thestatusquo]

STD. I hate to break to you, and I'm sorry it got lost, but I clearly said "Not a cop investigation." Right before I said "not so random vote" to avoid just that confusion.

[Save The Dragons]

Can someone else verify? I don't remember this, but I could have missed it.

[Thestatusquo]

If there were more people actually posting...It would have been up by now.

[Zindaras]

I remember it. If my memory serves me well (and it usually does), he said the evidence wasn't conclusive and he wouldn't reveal it.

[HurriKaty]

Alright, lets get started again.

Random Vote: Toaster Strudel

[Wuffles_II]

Well, I *don't* think that placing all of the possible theories for why our doc, vanilla and miller being NKed in one night is in any way a scum action - or are you saying there are possibilities I have yet to reveal?

[Save The Dragons]

Wait. Did you say this:

"Not a cop investigation."

which implies not a cop investigation, or this:

he said the evidence wasn't conclusive and he wouldn't reveal it.

which implies something else entirely, i.e. you have reason to believe Wuffles is suspicious, but you're not 100% sure?

[petroleumjelly]

The Official “We’ve Found a Witch: May we Burn Her?” Vote Count!

creampuffeater – 2 – Mert, Fritzler
TheEyeofMordor – 2 – TheEyeofMordor, Olio
TheStatusQuo – 2 – Wuffles_II, Save the Dragons
Wuffles_II – 2 – creampuffeater, Thestatusquo

Illumina – 1 – Toaster Strudel
Mert – 1 – Zindaras
Toaster Strudel – 1 – HurriKaty

With

17

alive, it takes

9

to test weigh somebody against a duck (aka kill them for an arbitrary reason).

Still think that churches float on water – 6 – Armlx, Bogre, Illumina, Marli, RangeroftheNorth, SpectrumVoid

[Thestatusquo]

I said this, and exactly this "Not so random vote: Wuffles(Not a cop investigation.)" I think Zinderas is confusing what I said and his interpretation of what I said.

[Save The Dragons]

Not so random = stuff from a past game?

[creampuffeater]

Ummm TSQ, I think that if you have a somewhat decent reason (other than scum in last game), I think you should probably share it. Since this is day 1, any reason usually will get looked at, even if bad.

[Thestatusquo]

Cream puff eater, read up. I did. But good guess.

[Thestatusquo]

STD: Partially, but I apparently also underestimated the ammount of experience he had on wifom. Check my other reason. It's the meat of my vote at the moment.

[olio]

STD, I remember TSQ saying "Not a cop investigation".

[Save The Dragons]

i'm wary of people who announce "oo! I like my random vote now!"

I think you had intent and created motive, not the other way around, which does not bode in your favor.

Wuffles, it was just a little bit better than a random vote. However, the second thing, and the fact that you ignored it, and focused on the other, obviously not strong thing in the post sort of makes me tick a little.

This post is suspect. You keep building these little points on Wuffles that don't look so good to me.

[Thestatusquo]

I'm not building anything. I'm putting a little day one pressure on the most scummy thing I see so far.

[spectrumvoid]

I went to the supermarket today and bought a Toaster Strudel. Then I realised I'd forgotten about this game.

vote: TSQ

Nope, not buying that. Voting for the same reason as STD's last post.

[Wuffles_II]

So...how many people yet to post now?