Mini 422 - Paranoia Mafia - Game Over

Mojo · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:22 am

PWS, your answer does not compute.

Are you a mutant? If so, are you registered?
Are you a member of a secret society?
Do you wear fur hats during night cycles?
What is your clearance level?

Barrom├â┬ín · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:29 am

All those who vote PWS...

Have you reasons?

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:30 am

Yes, I have "reasons".

Sarcastro · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:50 am

My new reason is that despite having so many votes on him, PWS still can't manage to say anything more than "Die in fires".

Also,

FoS: Mojo

DiamondHawk · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:06 pm

Sarcastro wrote:My new reason is that despite having so many votes on him, PWS still can't manage to say anything more than "Die in fires".

Also,
FoS: Mojo

Well yeah, it's kinda hard to explain why you got random voted, and then random wagoned. (Courtesy me, though I don't really see a new target for my vote yet.)

Why the FoS?

DiamondHawk · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:07 pm

[[EBWOP]] I remembered. It's because he wasn't being happy enough at the time.

Sarcastro · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:07 pm

DiamondHawk wrote:Why the FoS?

Eh, not much of a reason. Just seemed a bit scummy in his last few posts. Nothing to write home about, more a note to myself than anything.

M4yhem · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:56 am

Mojo wrote: R&D research declares that voting for Mojo is the surest and fastest way to become unhappy.

Mojo wrote:Well, I am a happiness officer. So if it makes you happy...

Vote: Playswithsquirrels

I have recorded a strange inconsistancy in your thinking, Friend Mojo. Would you please explain? Speak up, I'll be recording this...

PlaysWithSquirrels wrote:Die in fires.

That doesn't sound very happy, Citizen.

Mojo · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:45 am

I don't see the inconsistencies, M4yhem. Could you please elaborate so I can respond?

StevieT92 · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:02 pm

PWS is looking very bad, but he's doesn't seem like a very good lynch right now.

Sarcastro · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 6:35 pm

StevieT92 wrote:PWS is looking very bad, but he's doesn't seem like a very good lynch right now.

Please explain why someone who looks very bad is not a good lynch.

FoS: StevieT92

PlaysWithSquirrels · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:03 pm

Sarcastro wrote:My new reason is that despite having so many votes on him, PWS still can't manage to say anything more than "Die in fires".

Also,
FoS: Mojo

Perhaps it's because all votes against me have no reasoning behind them and you're leading a lynch-hungry town against me for absolutely no reason at all.

Sarcastro · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:32 pm

PlaysWithSquirrels wrote:
Sarcastro wrote:My new reason is that despite having so many votes on him, PWS still can't manage to say anything more than "Die in fires".

Also,
FoS: Mojo
Perhaps it's because all votes against me have no reasoning behind them and you're leading a lynch-hungry town against me for absolutely no reason at all.

See, here's the thing: I don't expect townies to lurk in plain sight when they're getting bandwagoned; I expect them to do something useful, like convince me that Stevie is scum.

Mojo · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:17 pm

PWS, you chose to ignore all my questions (post 75). Those were serious questions (except maybe the third one) and I expect serious answers.

M4yhem · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:20 am

Forgive me, Mojo. I misread the bits I quoted. Probably because of mutants.

Plays sounds a little sulky. This does not bode well for his happiness levels. However, I've yet to see anything resembling a case against him, so I believe it's a little early to be talking about a lynch, Sarcastro.

Stark's a commie lurker, also.

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:09 am

PWS is mutant scum. Only mutants would play with squirrels.

PlaysWithSquirrels · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:53 am

Mojo wrote:PWS, you chose to ignore all my questions (post 75). Those were serious questions (except maybe the third one) and I expect serious answers.

You asked me to claim. I'm not claiming at this time.

Mojo · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:29 am

I didn't ask you to claim. I asked nothing about powers or night choices.
I asked you a series of questions that would help me determine if I can trust you.

PlaysWithSquirrels · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:04 am

Mojo wrote:I didn't ask you to claim. I asked nothing about powers or night choices.
I asked you a series of questions that would help me determine if I can trust you.

Yeah, you're asking me to claim. The answer is "no."

Sarcastro · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:17 am

M4yhem wrote:Plays sounds a little sulky. This does not bode well for his happiness levels. However, I've yet to see anything resembling a case against him, so I believe it's a little early to be talking about a lynch, Sarcastro.

When did I seriously say anything about lynching PWS (right away, that is)?

Mojo wrote:I didn't ask you to claim. I asked nothing about powers or night choices.
I asked you a series of questions that would help me determine if I can trust you.

You were fishing for role info that he's obviously not inclined to give you. What's he going to say? "Yeah, I'm a mutant Communist, you can go ahead and kill me now"?

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:PWS is mutant scum. Only mutants would play with squirrels.

What's a squirrel?

FoS: Cogito Ergo Sum

Thesp · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:44 am

Friend Computer is everywhere. You have nothing to fear.

Official Vote Count

PlaysWithSquirrels

- 5 (Sarcastro, DiamondHawk, Cogito Ergo Sum, Coron, Mojo)

Sarcastro

- 1 (PlaysWithSquirrels)

Mojo

- 1 (dahen)

Stark

- 3 (M4yhem, Maz Medias, StevieT92)

M4yhem

- 1 (stark)

Cogito Ergo Sum

- 1 (BarromÃ¡n)

With 12 surviving, it takes 7 to brainscrub and present for summary execution.

Mojo · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:57 am

Sarcastro wrote:You were fishing for role info that he's obviously not inclined to give you. What's he going to say? "Yeah, I'm a mutant Communist, you can go ahead and kill me now"?

First of all, I'm not fishing, I'm down right asking for info.
Second of all, my role suggests that not all mutants and secret societies are *immediate* threats to friend computer.

Currently, I'm willing to lynch members of very few secret societies. I am not willing to lynch mutants only on the basis of being mutants.
I'm asking these questions in order to get a better idea of what's going on in this game, as I have a pretty good guess of what is actually going on.

Right now, it seems that he isn't providing info because he needs time to come up with fake info, and I don't like it. If he was really pro-computer, he wouldn't need to hide anything.

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:33 am

Mojo, we all know they aren't all immediate threats. And you were *essentially* asking for a claim. Which he refused.

stark · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:48 am

M4yhem wrote: Stark's a commie lurker, also.

I have had no reason to contribute, friend Mojo, and refuse to involve myself in the PWS battle. What is happening to him is very similar to what is happening to me at the moment, with three meaningless votes to my name. The lack of solid reasoning from you and others does not help your image as a friendly pro-town member. Mindless votemongering cannot be reasoned with.

Mojo · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:57 am

Stark, it's funny how you quoted M4yhem and said 'Mojo'.

CES wrote:Mojo, we all know they aren't all immediate threats.

Who? You and your scum buddies?

Anyway, fine, I asked for some info and he refused, I'll drop it. Let's just play in the mud some more.