ZeekLTK wrote:Off the Mark wrote:vote: ZeekLTK
It's WAAAAY too early to start acting like you've confidently figured out scumbuddies. That was a ridiculous statement.
FoS: Off the Mark
You are WAAAAY too defensive for such an early stage of the game.
I'm not being defensive, I'm objecting to your comment about "not voting one of your scumbuddies". That seems really scummy to me, regardless of who the target is.
Zeek wrote:It was just an offhanded comment lol.
Possible, I am watching you.
But it is odd that you:
a) Are constantly throwing your vote around to hope it sticks on a bandwagon (you've voted 4 times total so far)
That's the best way to scumhunt in the early game. That's how I play it, anyway. I see the slightest hint of scumminess, I call it out, place a vote, and then watch for reactions. Your reaction was scummy.
b) Have been a vote on every person so far that has had more than 1 (j-man, earwig, me)
Are you honestly accusing me of jumping on bandwagons? Because I thought all of my scumtell call-outs were completely original. Were there other votes on you when I voted for you? If so, I had no idea.
c) Your initial vote for earwig was a "random vote" but you tried to make a comment as if to put some reasoning behind it, which mafia tend to do
Um, no, that is not a mafia tell. My vote was not truly random in the sense that I didn't go to random.org or roll a die or anything. I glanced over the list of names and picked one out that caught my eye. So I felt it was random enough to still call it a random vote. You are really reaching here, which feels like overdefensiveness to me.
d) Are so defensive so early
As I explained, my accusation of you has nothing to do with defensiveness. I never even defended myself at all until this post. I simply accused you, and you are calling it defensiveness.
e) Are mafia but won't admit to it
Sorry, no.
